“为什么一个‘外国人’就应该比我强呢?”:中国大陆大学在初级学术教师招聘方面的优先做法

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tertiary Education and Management Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s11233-021-09083-3
Ningyang Chen
{"title":"“为什么一个‘外国人’就应该比我强呢?”:中国大陆大学在初级学术教师招聘方面的优先做法","authors":"Ningyang Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11233-021-09083-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>China's phenomenal growth in higher education has received increasing scholarly attention, particularly its initiative to build world-class universities. Though a crucial contributor to its rapid development, the changing hiring practices of mainland Chinese university employers remain largely underexposed. This study presents qualitative evidence drawn from document analysis and in-depth interviews to show current trends, which reveal university employers' widespread preference for graduates with an overseas background, will tend to deprive domestically trained graduates of vital opportunities for career development, which may have detrimental consequences in the long run. The study found that a substantial number of Chinese university employers explicitly articulated their talent preferences, with a strong favour towards applicants with overseas credentials and/or experience. Further analysis of the textual data identified two nuanced trends: universities in a more economically developed region and at a higher level tended to have more rigid and exclusive recruitment preferences for candidates with an overseas background; competitive employers tended to be selective in applicants' overseas backgrounds by gauging their potential productivity measured in quantifiable research outputs. In response to the pressure brought by such preferential practices, domestic doctorates were found to be learning to accept and struggle to cope with the changes. These findings are discussed in the context of the internationalisation of higher education and the popularisation of overseas education with implications for and beyond the Chinese experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":51727,"journal":{"name":"Tertiary Education and Management","volume":"28 1","pages":"17-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Why should a 'foreigner' be better than me?\\\": preferential practices in junior academic faculty recruitment among mainland Chinese universities.\",\"authors\":\"Ningyang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11233-021-09083-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>China's phenomenal growth in higher education has received increasing scholarly attention, particularly its initiative to build world-class universities. Though a crucial contributor to its rapid development, the changing hiring practices of mainland Chinese university employers remain largely underexposed. This study presents qualitative evidence drawn from document analysis and in-depth interviews to show current trends, which reveal university employers' widespread preference for graduates with an overseas background, will tend to deprive domestically trained graduates of vital opportunities for career development, which may have detrimental consequences in the long run. The study found that a substantial number of Chinese university employers explicitly articulated their talent preferences, with a strong favour towards applicants with overseas credentials and/or experience. Further analysis of the textual data identified two nuanced trends: universities in a more economically developed region and at a higher level tended to have more rigid and exclusive recruitment preferences for candidates with an overseas background; competitive employers tended to be selective in applicants' overseas backgrounds by gauging their potential productivity measured in quantifiable research outputs. In response to the pressure brought by such preferential practices, domestic doctorates were found to be learning to accept and struggle to cope with the changes. These findings are discussed in the context of the internationalisation of higher education and the popularisation of overseas education with implications for and beyond the Chinese experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tertiary Education and Management\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"17-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8627381/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tertiary Education and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-021-09083-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tertiary Education and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-021-09083-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国高等教育的惊人发展引起了学术界越来越多的关注,尤其是中国建设世界一流大学的倡议。尽管中国大陆大学雇主不断变化的招聘方式是其快速发展的关键因素,但在很大程度上仍未得到充分曝光。本研究从文献分析和深度访谈中提取了定性证据,以显示当前的趋势。这些趋势表明,大学雇主普遍偏爱海外背景的毕业生,这往往会剥夺国内培养的毕业生职业发展的重要机会,从长远来看,这可能会产生有害的后果。研究发现,相当多的中国大学雇主明确表达了他们对人才的偏好,强烈倾向于拥有海外学历和/或经验的申请人。对文本数据的进一步分析发现了两个微妙的趋势:经济更发达地区和更高层次的大学倾向于对具有海外背景的候选人有更严格和排他性的招聘偏好;竞争激烈的雇主往往会对申请人的海外背景进行筛选,通过衡量他们的潜在生产力(以可量化的研究成果衡量)。为了应对这种优惠做法带来的压力,国内的博士们正在学习接受并努力应对这种变化。这些发现是在高等教育国际化和海外教育普及的背景下讨论的,对中国经验的启示和超越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Why should a 'foreigner' be better than me?": preferential practices in junior academic faculty recruitment among mainland Chinese universities.

China's phenomenal growth in higher education has received increasing scholarly attention, particularly its initiative to build world-class universities. Though a crucial contributor to its rapid development, the changing hiring practices of mainland Chinese university employers remain largely underexposed. This study presents qualitative evidence drawn from document analysis and in-depth interviews to show current trends, which reveal university employers' widespread preference for graduates with an overseas background, will tend to deprive domestically trained graduates of vital opportunities for career development, which may have detrimental consequences in the long run. The study found that a substantial number of Chinese university employers explicitly articulated their talent preferences, with a strong favour towards applicants with overseas credentials and/or experience. Further analysis of the textual data identified two nuanced trends: universities in a more economically developed region and at a higher level tended to have more rigid and exclusive recruitment preferences for candidates with an overseas background; competitive employers tended to be selective in applicants' overseas backgrounds by gauging their potential productivity measured in quantifiable research outputs. In response to the pressure brought by such preferential practices, domestic doctorates were found to be learning to accept and struggle to cope with the changes. These findings are discussed in the context of the internationalisation of higher education and the popularisation of overseas education with implications for and beyond the Chinese experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tertiary Education and Management
Tertiary Education and Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Tertiary Education and Management (TEAM) is an international, interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed journal that welcomes research contributions that reflect upon, study or question main developmental trends and practices, and address current and future challenges in higher education. The thematic focus of TEAM includes management, governance and organisation of higher education; teaching and learning in higher education; the academic profession and academic careers; higher education and the labour market; and institutional research in higher education.  TEAM is jointly published by Springer and EAIR – The European Higher Education Society, and is intended to contribute to EAIR’s mission of creating a better linkage of research, policy and practice in higher education.Articles submitted should as a consequence be written for, understood by, and be relevant for a multicultural, multifaceted and international audience, consisting of both the international academic community and the field of practice within higher education.  TEAM welcomes articles using a variety of approaches, methods and perspectives given that the article demonstrate the relevance of the research in a broader context whether this be in other higher education institutions, other national settings or in the international arena.  Occasionally, the journal also publishes articles where personal viewpoints/experiences or political arguments are made to stimulate discussion and reflection, or to challenge established thinking in the field of higher education. Such pieces are published in a dedicated ''Forum'' section of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信