努力实现包容和社会正义:多视角

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Terry Wrigley
{"title":"努力实现包容和社会正义:多视角","authors":"Terry Wrigley","doi":"10.1177/1365480220909631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue of Improving Schools brings together an interesting collection of papers which examine questions of inclusion and social justice, and particularly the possibilities for including pupils more successfully. First, Lea Lund (Odense, Denmark) looks at building professional learning communities which enable teachers to scrutinise their own practices. In particular, routine actions and thinking are questioned, and teachers are able to experiment systematically and collectively develop a shared language. This form of school-based staff development promotes collective responsibility, and is characterised by reflective dialogue, and an awareness of your own beliefs. Attitudes change towards ‘hard-to-reach’ students, so instead of writing off individuals as ‘unmotivated’ or ‘lazy’, teachers discover ways of talking with them more. A key element is peer observation and coaching to refine practice. Bernice Garnett and colleagues (Vermont, USA) examine the problem that exclusionary disciplinary procedures continue to damage educational outcomes for students from specific racial, income and ability categories. They look at the potential for restorative practices to mitigate these disparities and improve the school climate. Their research and development is built on a foundation of community-based participatory research supported by a partnership between a university and the school district. Oscar Espinoza and colleagues (Chile) report on an initiative to provide Second Opportunity Centres for young people who have not completed high school. The centres have some similarities to ‘alternative schools’ in parts of Europe and the United States. An emphasis is placed on high levels of student participation, rather than on teacher-dominated methods. This paper carefully examines the reasons why young people had dropped out of school, including defeatism and disengagement due to the traditional school’s misrecognition of their life circumstances or academic potential. Lorna Hepburn and Wendi Beamish (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia) write about the importance of proactive classroom management with the intentional use of strategies to avoid and preempt problem behaviour. Based on interviews with secondary school teachers, they relate these strategies to engagement and achievement. The interviews reveal the importance of authentic relationships and a recognition that some of the causes of poor behaviour lie in difficulties in understanding and carrying out the set tasks. Their conclusions point to a need for improved teacher education. Martin Brown and colleagues (Dublin City University, Ireland) are interested in the scope for greater parent and student voice in evaluation and planning in schools. This becomes particularly important given an international trend towards school self-evaluation and decision-making. The authors review the different conceptualisations of parent and student voice and the conflicts of perspective and power involved. Key issues include restrictions in what teachers feel students or 909631 IMP0010.1177/1365480220909631Improving SchoolsEditorial editorial2020","PeriodicalId":45995,"journal":{"name":"Improving Schools","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1365480220909631","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working towards inclusion and social justice: Multiple perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Terry Wrigley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1365480220909631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This issue of Improving Schools brings together an interesting collection of papers which examine questions of inclusion and social justice, and particularly the possibilities for including pupils more successfully. First, Lea Lund (Odense, Denmark) looks at building professional learning communities which enable teachers to scrutinise their own practices. In particular, routine actions and thinking are questioned, and teachers are able to experiment systematically and collectively develop a shared language. This form of school-based staff development promotes collective responsibility, and is characterised by reflective dialogue, and an awareness of your own beliefs. Attitudes change towards ‘hard-to-reach’ students, so instead of writing off individuals as ‘unmotivated’ or ‘lazy’, teachers discover ways of talking with them more. A key element is peer observation and coaching to refine practice. Bernice Garnett and colleagues (Vermont, USA) examine the problem that exclusionary disciplinary procedures continue to damage educational outcomes for students from specific racial, income and ability categories. They look at the potential for restorative practices to mitigate these disparities and improve the school climate. Their research and development is built on a foundation of community-based participatory research supported by a partnership between a university and the school district. Oscar Espinoza and colleagues (Chile) report on an initiative to provide Second Opportunity Centres for young people who have not completed high school. The centres have some similarities to ‘alternative schools’ in parts of Europe and the United States. An emphasis is placed on high levels of student participation, rather than on teacher-dominated methods. This paper carefully examines the reasons why young people had dropped out of school, including defeatism and disengagement due to the traditional school’s misrecognition of their life circumstances or academic potential. Lorna Hepburn and Wendi Beamish (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia) write about the importance of proactive classroom management with the intentional use of strategies to avoid and preempt problem behaviour. Based on interviews with secondary school teachers, they relate these strategies to engagement and achievement. The interviews reveal the importance of authentic relationships and a recognition that some of the causes of poor behaviour lie in difficulties in understanding and carrying out the set tasks. Their conclusions point to a need for improved teacher education. Martin Brown and colleagues (Dublin City University, Ireland) are interested in the scope for greater parent and student voice in evaluation and planning in schools. This becomes particularly important given an international trend towards school self-evaluation and decision-making. The authors review the different conceptualisations of parent and student voice and the conflicts of perspective and power involved. Key issues include restrictions in what teachers feel students or 909631 IMP0010.1177/1365480220909631Improving SchoolsEditorial editorial2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":45995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Improving Schools\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1365480220909631\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Improving Schools\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480220909631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving Schools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480220909631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期《改善学校》汇集了一系列有趣的论文,探讨了包容和社会正义问题,特别是更成功地包容学生的可能性。首先,Lea Lund(丹麦欧登塞)着眼于建立专业的学习社区,使教师能够仔细审查自己的实践。特别是,日常行为和思维受到质疑,教师能够系统地进行实验,集体开发一种共享的语言。这种以学校为基础的员工发展形式促进了集体责任,其特点是反思性对话和对自己信仰的认识。人们对“难以接触”的学生的态度发生了变化,因此,老师们没有将个人视为“没有动力”或“懒惰”,而是发现了更多与他们交谈的方式。一个关键因素是同行观察和指导,以完善实践。Bernice Garnett及其同事(美国佛蒙特州)研究了排斥性纪律程序继续损害特定种族、收入和能力类别学生的教育成果的问题。他们着眼于恢复性做法的潜力,以缓解这些差异并改善学校氛围。他们的研究和开发建立在以社区为基础的参与性研究的基础上,并得到大学和学区之间伙伴关系的支持。Oscar Espinoza及其同事(智利)报告了为未完成高中学业的年轻人提供第二机会中心的倡议。这些中心与欧洲和美国部分地区的“替代学校”有一些相似之处。重点是学生的高水平参与,而不是教师主导的方法。本文仔细研究了年轻人辍学的原因,包括失败主义和由于传统学校对他们的生活环境或学术潜力的错误认识而导致的脱离。Lorna Hepburn和Wendi Beamish(澳大利亚昆士兰格里菲斯大学)写了积极主动的课堂管理的重要性,他们有意使用策略来避免和先发制人的问题行为。根据对中学教师的访谈,他们将这些策略与参与度和成就联系起来。采访揭示了真实关系的重要性,并认识到不良行为的一些原因在于理解和执行既定任务的困难。他们的结论指出需要改进教师教育。Martin Brown及其同事(爱尔兰都柏林城市大学)对在学校评估和规划中提高家长和学生的发言权感兴趣。鉴于学校自我评价和决策的国际趋势,这一点变得尤为重要。作者回顾了家长和学生声音的不同概念,以及所涉及的视角和权力冲突。关键问题包括限制教师对学生的看法或909631 IMP0010.1177/13654802909631改善学校编辑编辑2020
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Working towards inclusion and social justice: Multiple perspectives
This issue of Improving Schools brings together an interesting collection of papers which examine questions of inclusion and social justice, and particularly the possibilities for including pupils more successfully. First, Lea Lund (Odense, Denmark) looks at building professional learning communities which enable teachers to scrutinise their own practices. In particular, routine actions and thinking are questioned, and teachers are able to experiment systematically and collectively develop a shared language. This form of school-based staff development promotes collective responsibility, and is characterised by reflective dialogue, and an awareness of your own beliefs. Attitudes change towards ‘hard-to-reach’ students, so instead of writing off individuals as ‘unmotivated’ or ‘lazy’, teachers discover ways of talking with them more. A key element is peer observation and coaching to refine practice. Bernice Garnett and colleagues (Vermont, USA) examine the problem that exclusionary disciplinary procedures continue to damage educational outcomes for students from specific racial, income and ability categories. They look at the potential for restorative practices to mitigate these disparities and improve the school climate. Their research and development is built on a foundation of community-based participatory research supported by a partnership between a university and the school district. Oscar Espinoza and colleagues (Chile) report on an initiative to provide Second Opportunity Centres for young people who have not completed high school. The centres have some similarities to ‘alternative schools’ in parts of Europe and the United States. An emphasis is placed on high levels of student participation, rather than on teacher-dominated methods. This paper carefully examines the reasons why young people had dropped out of school, including defeatism and disengagement due to the traditional school’s misrecognition of their life circumstances or academic potential. Lorna Hepburn and Wendi Beamish (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia) write about the importance of proactive classroom management with the intentional use of strategies to avoid and preempt problem behaviour. Based on interviews with secondary school teachers, they relate these strategies to engagement and achievement. The interviews reveal the importance of authentic relationships and a recognition that some of the causes of poor behaviour lie in difficulties in understanding and carrying out the set tasks. Their conclusions point to a need for improved teacher education. Martin Brown and colleagues (Dublin City University, Ireland) are interested in the scope for greater parent and student voice in evaluation and planning in schools. This becomes particularly important given an international trend towards school self-evaluation and decision-making. The authors review the different conceptualisations of parent and student voice and the conflicts of perspective and power involved. Key issues include restrictions in what teachers feel students or 909631 IMP0010.1177/1365480220909631Improving SchoolsEditorial editorial2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Improving Schools
Improving Schools EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Improving Schools is for all those engaged in school development, whether improving schools in difficulty or making successful schools even better. The journal includes contributions from across the world with an increasingly international readership including teachers, heads, academics, education authority staff, inspectors and consultants. Improving Schools has created a forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences. Major national policies and initiatives have been evaluated, to share good practice and to highlight problems. The journal also reports on visits to successful schools in diverse contexts, and includes book reviews on a wide range of developmental issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信