超越有效性焦点以适应选拔系统设计的大趋势

IF 11.5 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1017/iop.2023.28

John W. Jones, M. Cunningham

{"title":"超越有效性焦点以适应选拔系统设计的大趋势","authors":"John W. Jones, M. Cunningham","doi":"10.1017/iop.2023.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sackett, Zhang, Berry, and Lievens (2023) are to be commended for correcting the validity estimates of widely used predictors, many of which turned out to have less validity than prior studies led us to believe. Yet, we should recognize that psychologists and their clients were misled for many years about the utility of some mainstream assessments and selection system design surely suffered. Although Sackett et al. (2023) offered useful recommendations for researchers, they never really addressed selection system design from a practitioner perspective. This response aims to address that omission, emphasizing a multidimensional approach to design science (Casillas et al., 2019).","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"336 - 340"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Going beyond a validity focus to accommodate megatrends in selection system design\",\"authors\":\"John W. Jones, M. Cunningham\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/iop.2023.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sackett, Zhang, Berry, and Lievens (2023) are to be commended for correcting the validity estimates of widely used predictors, many of which turned out to have less validity than prior studies led us to believe. Yet, we should recognize that psychologists and their clients were misled for many years about the utility of some mainstream assessments and selection system design surely suffered. Although Sackett et al. (2023) offered useful recommendations for researchers, they never really addressed selection system design from a practitioner perspective. This response aims to address that omission, emphasizing a multidimensional approach to design science (Casillas et al., 2019).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"336 - 340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.28\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.28","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

Sackett、Zhang、Berry和Lievens（2023）因校正了广泛使用的预测因子的有效性估计而受到赞扬，其中许多预测因子的正确性低于我们之前的研究。然而，我们应该认识到，心理学家和他们的客户多年来一直被误导，认为一些主流评估和选拔系统设计的效用肯定会受到影响。尽管Sackett等人（2023）为研究人员提供了有用的建议，但他们从未真正从从业者的角度讨论过选择系统的设计。这一回应旨在解决这一遗漏，强调设计科学的多维方法（Casillas等人，2019）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Going beyond a validity focus to accommodate megatrends in selection system design

Sackett, Zhang, Berry, and Lievens (2023) are to be commended for correcting the validity estimates of widely used predictors, many of which turned out to have less validity than prior studies led us to believe. Yet, we should recognize that psychologists and their clients were misled for many years about the utility of some mainstream assessments and selection system design surely suffered. Although Sackett et al. (2023) offered useful recommendations for researchers, they never really addressed selection system design from a practitioner perspective. This response aims to address that omission, emphasizing a multidimensional approach to design science (Casillas et al., 2019).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

7.70

自引率

10.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice is a peer-reviewed academic journal published on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. The journal focuses on interactive exchanges on topics of importance to the science and practice of the field. It features articles that present new ideas or different takes on existing ideas, stimulating dialogue about important issues in the field. Additionally, the journal is indexed and abstracted in Clarivate Analytics SSCI, Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS), ProQuest, PsycINFO, and Scopus.