使用表现测量预测幼儿阅读结果:一项探索性的纵向分析

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
W. van Dijk, Danielle L. Pico, Rachel Kaplan, Valentina A. Contesse, Holly B. Lane
{"title":"使用表现测量预测幼儿阅读结果:一项探索性的纵向分析","authors":"W. van Dijk, Danielle L. Pico, Rachel Kaplan, Valentina A. Contesse, Holly B. Lane","doi":"10.1080/07380569.2022.2072108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The use of online literacy applications is proliferating in elementary classrooms. Using data generated by these applications is assumed to be helpful for teachers to identify struggling readers. Unfortunately, many teachers are unsure how to use and interpret the plethora of data from these apps. In this longitudinal study, we followed a cohort of students from kindergarten through first grade (n = 54). We then used quasi-simplex models to estimate the relation between five performance measures taken from an online literacy application and five reading related progress monitoring outcomes at four sequential time points controlling for previous achievement. Results suggest performance measures have more predictive power during kindergarten and the amount of time students were logged-in to the program was the most consistent predictor across outcomes and assessment periods. The number of interactions with the program was significantly related to students’ decoding skills. We discuss how these results might be used to increase teachers’ use of performance measures to adapt instruction.","PeriodicalId":45769,"journal":{"name":"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS","volume":"39 1","pages":"252 - 273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Performance Measures to Predict Early Childhood Reading Outcomes: An Exploratory Longitudinal Analysis\",\"authors\":\"W. van Dijk, Danielle L. Pico, Rachel Kaplan, Valentina A. Contesse, Holly B. Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07380569.2022.2072108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The use of online literacy applications is proliferating in elementary classrooms. Using data generated by these applications is assumed to be helpful for teachers to identify struggling readers. Unfortunately, many teachers are unsure how to use and interpret the plethora of data from these apps. In this longitudinal study, we followed a cohort of students from kindergarten through first grade (n = 54). We then used quasi-simplex models to estimate the relation between five performance measures taken from an online literacy application and five reading related progress monitoring outcomes at four sequential time points controlling for previous achievement. Results suggest performance measures have more predictive power during kindergarten and the amount of time students were logged-in to the program was the most consistent predictor across outcomes and assessment periods. The number of interactions with the program was significantly related to students’ decoding skills. We discuss how these results might be used to increase teachers’ use of performance measures to adapt instruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"252 - 273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2072108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2072108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在线读写应用程序在小学课堂上的使用正在激增。使用这些应用程序生成的数据被认为有助于教师识别困难的读者。不幸的是,许多教师不确定如何使用和解释来自这些应用程序的大量数据。在这项纵向研究中,我们跟踪了一组从幼儿园到一年级的学生(n = 54)。然后,我们使用准单纯形模型来估计从在线识字应用程序中获得的五个绩效指标与在四个连续时间点控制先前成就的五个阅读相关进展监测结果之间的关系。结果表明,表现指标在幼儿园期间具有更强的预测能力,学生登录该项目的时间是整个结果和评估期间最一致的预测指标。与程序互动的次数与学生的解码能力显著相关。我们将讨论如何使用这些结果来增加教师对绩效指标的使用,以适应教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Performance Measures to Predict Early Childhood Reading Outcomes: An Exploratory Longitudinal Analysis
Abstract The use of online literacy applications is proliferating in elementary classrooms. Using data generated by these applications is assumed to be helpful for teachers to identify struggling readers. Unfortunately, many teachers are unsure how to use and interpret the plethora of data from these apps. In this longitudinal study, we followed a cohort of students from kindergarten through first grade (n = 54). We then used quasi-simplex models to estimate the relation between five performance measures taken from an online literacy application and five reading related progress monitoring outcomes at four sequential time points controlling for previous achievement. Results suggest performance measures have more predictive power during kindergarten and the amount of time students were logged-in to the program was the most consistent predictor across outcomes and assessment periods. The number of interactions with the program was significantly related to students’ decoding skills. We discuss how these results might be used to increase teachers’ use of performance measures to adapt instruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS
COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Under the editorship of D. LaMont Johnson, PhD, a nationally recognized leader in the field of educational computing, Computers in the Schools is supported by an editorial review board of prominent specialists in the school and educational setting. Material presented in this highly acclaimed journal goes beyond the “how we did it” magazine article or handbook by offering a rich source of serious discussion for educators, administrators, computer center directors, and special service providers in the school setting. Articles emphasize the practical aspect of any application, but also tie theory to practice, relate present accomplishments to past efforts and future trends, identify conclusions and their implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信