语法教学:身体参与语法的学习和教学

IF 0.6 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
F. Suñer, Jörg Roche, Liesbeth Van Vossel
{"title":"语法教学:身体参与语法的学习和教学","authors":"F. Suñer, Jörg Roche, Liesbeth Van Vossel","doi":"10.1075/rcl.00126.sun","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cognitive Linguistics claims that language is not purely abstract and arbitrary, but meaningful and grounded in\n concepts arising from our embodied experiences (Oakley, 2007). The potential of using\n imagery and bodily representations to explain the conceptual motivation of grammar has been widely recognized in the context of\n language acquisition and teaching. This study investigates whether an increase of learners’ bodily engagement through the\n performance of bodily movements and locomotion produces even greater learning outcomes. To this end, we refer to Talmy’s (2000) Force Dynamic System to conduct a pretest-posttest interventional study\n with two groups of learners dealing with the German modal verb system. Whereas the first group watched multimedia animations (low\n bodily engagement), the second group was asked to perform bodily movements in line with the force-dynamic notions underlying the\n different modal verbs (high bodily engagement). The results show that both groups produced similar learning gains and that an\n increased bodily engagement could not be associated directly with a significantly better performance.","PeriodicalId":51932,"journal":{"name":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bodily engagement in the learning and teaching of grammar\",\"authors\":\"F. Suñer, Jörg Roche, Liesbeth Van Vossel\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/rcl.00126.sun\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Cognitive Linguistics claims that language is not purely abstract and arbitrary, but meaningful and grounded in\\n concepts arising from our embodied experiences (Oakley, 2007). The potential of using\\n imagery and bodily representations to explain the conceptual motivation of grammar has been widely recognized in the context of\\n language acquisition and teaching. This study investigates whether an increase of learners’ bodily engagement through the\\n performance of bodily movements and locomotion produces even greater learning outcomes. To this end, we refer to Talmy’s (2000) Force Dynamic System to conduct a pretest-posttest interventional study\\n with two groups of learners dealing with the German modal verb system. Whereas the first group watched multimedia animations (low\\n bodily engagement), the second group was asked to perform bodily movements in line with the force-dynamic notions underlying the\\n different modal verbs (high bodily engagement). The results show that both groups produced similar learning gains and that an\\n increased bodily engagement could not be associated directly with a significantly better performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00126.sun\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00126.sun","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知语言学认为,语言不是纯粹抽象和武断的,而是有意义的,建立在我们具体化经验产生的概念基础上的(Oakley, 2007)。在语言习得和教学中,使用意象和身体表征来解释语法概念动机的潜力已得到广泛认可。本研究探讨了通过身体动作和运动的表现来增加学习者的身体投入是否会产生更大的学习效果。为此,我们参考Talmy(2000)的《力动态系统》对两组学习德语情态动词系统的学习者进行了前测后测干预研究。第一组观看多媒体动画(低身体投入),第二组被要求根据不同情态动词背后的力量动态概念进行身体动作(高身体投入)。结果显示,两组学生都取得了相似的学习成绩,而且身体投入的增加并不会直接导致成绩的显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bodily engagement in the learning and teaching of grammar
Cognitive Linguistics claims that language is not purely abstract and arbitrary, but meaningful and grounded in concepts arising from our embodied experiences (Oakley, 2007). The potential of using imagery and bodily representations to explain the conceptual motivation of grammar has been widely recognized in the context of language acquisition and teaching. This study investigates whether an increase of learners’ bodily engagement through the performance of bodily movements and locomotion produces even greater learning outcomes. To this end, we refer to Talmy’s (2000) Force Dynamic System to conduct a pretest-posttest interventional study with two groups of learners dealing with the German modal verb system. Whereas the first group watched multimedia animations (low bodily engagement), the second group was asked to perform bodily movements in line with the force-dynamic notions underlying the different modal verbs (high bodily engagement). The results show that both groups produced similar learning gains and that an increased bodily engagement could not be associated directly with a significantly better performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信