儿童患者镇静下的磁共振成像:单一机构的经验

IF 0.3 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Ilker Onguc Aycan, Y. Taseli, H. Temel, B. Dinç, N. Coskunfirat, S. Sanli
{"title":"儿童患者镇静下的磁共振成像:单一机构的经验","authors":"Ilker Onguc Aycan, Y. Taseli, H. Temel, B. Dinç, N. Coskunfirat, S. Sanli","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for children are a challenge for anesthesiologists since the child must be sedated enough to stand still. But anesthetic drugs used for sedation might have serious side effects and monitorization resources and accessibility to the patient during MRI scan is limited. We retrospectively examined 977 pediatric patients' files who had MRI scans in our hospital. We observed that children received one of the four combinations of anesthetic drugs: group 1 received midazolam, propofol, and ketamine; group 2 received midazolam and ketamine; group 3 received midazolam and thiopental; and group 4 received midazolam and propofol combination for sedation. The patients in group 1 had significantly higher vomiting rates than the patients in group 4 (p = 0.005). We observed bronchospasm in patients in group 1 (p = 0.006) and group 3 (p = 0.001), more than in patients in group 4. Nausea and vomiting ratios were lower in group 4. In patients with nausea and vomiting within a week after the procedure, statistically significant lower neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio values (p = 0.012) were observed. All four anesthetic combinations used in the trial provided safe anesthesia for the children, during the MRI scan. The anesthetic choice must be made according to the procedure time and patient's comorbidities. In this trial, we observed minimum side effects with midazolam and propofol combination.","PeriodicalId":41283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Science","volume":"11 1","pages":"e185 - e192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1731335","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic Resonance Imaging under Sedation in Pediatric Patients: A Single-Institution Experience\",\"authors\":\"Ilker Onguc Aycan, Y. Taseli, H. Temel, B. Dinç, N. Coskunfirat, S. Sanli\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1731335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for children are a challenge for anesthesiologists since the child must be sedated enough to stand still. But anesthetic drugs used for sedation might have serious side effects and monitorization resources and accessibility to the patient during MRI scan is limited. We retrospectively examined 977 pediatric patients' files who had MRI scans in our hospital. We observed that children received one of the four combinations of anesthetic drugs: group 1 received midazolam, propofol, and ketamine; group 2 received midazolam and ketamine; group 3 received midazolam and thiopental; and group 4 received midazolam and propofol combination for sedation. The patients in group 1 had significantly higher vomiting rates than the patients in group 4 (p = 0.005). We observed bronchospasm in patients in group 1 (p = 0.006) and group 3 (p = 0.001), more than in patients in group 4. Nausea and vomiting ratios were lower in group 4. In patients with nausea and vomiting within a week after the procedure, statistically significant lower neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio values (p = 0.012) were observed. All four anesthetic combinations used in the trial provided safe anesthesia for the children, during the MRI scan. The anesthetic choice must be made according to the procedure time and patient's comorbidities. In this trial, we observed minimum side effects with midazolam and propofol combination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child Science\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"e185 - e192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1731335\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要儿童核磁共振成像(MRI)扫描对麻醉师来说是一个挑战,因为儿童必须服用足够的镇静剂才能站立不动。但用于镇静的麻醉药物可能会有严重的副作用,MRI扫描期间患者的监测资源和可及性有限。我们回顾性地检查了977名在我们医院进行MRI扫描的儿科患者的档案。我们观察到,儿童接受了四种麻醉药物组合中的一种:第一组接受咪唑安定、丙泊酚和氯胺酮;第2组给予咪唑安定和氯胺酮;第3组给予咪唑安定和硫喷妥钠;第4组给予咪唑安定和丙泊酚联合镇静。第1组患者的呕吐率明显高于第4组患者(p = 0.005)。我们观察到第1组患者的支气管痉挛(p = 0.006)和第3组(p = 0.001),高于第4组患者。第4组恶心呕吐率较低。在术后一周内出现恶心和呕吐的患者中,中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值降低具有统计学意义(p = 0.012)。试验中使用的所有四种麻醉剂组合在MRI扫描期间为儿童提供了安全的麻醉。必须根据手术时间和患者的合并症来选择麻醉剂。在本试验中,我们观察到咪唑安定和丙泊酚联合用药的副作用最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Magnetic Resonance Imaging under Sedation in Pediatric Patients: A Single-Institution Experience
Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for children are a challenge for anesthesiologists since the child must be sedated enough to stand still. But anesthetic drugs used for sedation might have serious side effects and monitorization resources and accessibility to the patient during MRI scan is limited. We retrospectively examined 977 pediatric patients' files who had MRI scans in our hospital. We observed that children received one of the four combinations of anesthetic drugs: group 1 received midazolam, propofol, and ketamine; group 2 received midazolam and ketamine; group 3 received midazolam and thiopental; and group 4 received midazolam and propofol combination for sedation. The patients in group 1 had significantly higher vomiting rates than the patients in group 4 (p = 0.005). We observed bronchospasm in patients in group 1 (p = 0.006) and group 3 (p = 0.001), more than in patients in group 4. Nausea and vomiting ratios were lower in group 4. In patients with nausea and vomiting within a week after the procedure, statistically significant lower neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio values (p = 0.012) were observed. All four anesthetic combinations used in the trial provided safe anesthesia for the children, during the MRI scan. The anesthetic choice must be made according to the procedure time and patient's comorbidities. In this trial, we observed minimum side effects with midazolam and propofol combination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信