作为一种解释方法的法律多元主义:国际法下土著人民土地权非殖民化的方法论途径

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jonas Perrin
{"title":"作为一种解释方法的法律多元主义:国际法下土著人民土地权非殖民化的方法论途径","authors":"Jonas Perrin","doi":"10.17163/uni.n26.2017.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever since the arrival of the European colonisers, theories of international law have been used to justify the process of dispossession of indigenous lands. Even though the adoption of human rights have led to some amelioration, the author claims that this has proved unsatisfactory to address indigenous concerns for one reason: international law remains deeply rooted in colonial concepts, such as the concepts of ‘sovereignty’ and ‘property’. Given that these concepts clearly contradict indigenous cosmovisions, the author proposes a pluralist interpretation of indigenous land rights under international law. Understood as a method of interpretation, it is able to take into account not only ‘state law’ but also indigenous conceptions of the relationship between human beings and the land. It is thus proposed that such a methodological approach may decolonise colonial concepts of international law.","PeriodicalId":42999,"journal":{"name":"Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas","volume":"1 1","pages":"23-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Pluralism as a Method of Interpretation: A Methodological Approach to Decolonising Indigenous Peoples’ Land Rights under International Law\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Perrin\",\"doi\":\"10.17163/uni.n26.2017.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ever since the arrival of the European colonisers, theories of international law have been used to justify the process of dispossession of indigenous lands. Even though the adoption of human rights have led to some amelioration, the author claims that this has proved unsatisfactory to address indigenous concerns for one reason: international law remains deeply rooted in colonial concepts, such as the concepts of ‘sovereignty’ and ‘property’. Given that these concepts clearly contradict indigenous cosmovisions, the author proposes a pluralist interpretation of indigenous land rights under international law. Understood as a method of interpretation, it is able to take into account not only ‘state law’ but also indigenous conceptions of the relationship between human beings and the land. It is thus proposed that such a methodological approach may decolonise colonial concepts of international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"23-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n26.2017.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n26.2017.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自从欧洲殖民者到来以来,国际法理论就被用来为剥夺土著土地的过程辩护。虽然人权的采用使情况有所改善,但发件人声称,事实证明这不能解决土著人民的关切,原因之一是:国际法仍然深深植根于殖民概念,例如“主权”和“财产”的概念。鉴于这些概念明显与土著的世界观相矛盾,作者建议在国际法下对土著土地权进行多元解释。作为一种解释方法,它不仅能够考虑到“国家法律”,还能够考虑到人与土地之间关系的土著观念。因此,有人建议,这种方法可以使国际法的殖民概念非殖民化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Pluralism as a Method of Interpretation: A Methodological Approach to Decolonising Indigenous Peoples’ Land Rights under International Law
Ever since the arrival of the European colonisers, theories of international law have been used to justify the process of dispossession of indigenous lands. Even though the adoption of human rights have led to some amelioration, the author claims that this has proved unsatisfactory to address indigenous concerns for one reason: international law remains deeply rooted in colonial concepts, such as the concepts of ‘sovereignty’ and ‘property’. Given that these concepts clearly contradict indigenous cosmovisions, the author proposes a pluralist interpretation of indigenous land rights under international law. Understood as a method of interpretation, it is able to take into account not only ‘state law’ but also indigenous conceptions of the relationship between human beings and the land. It is thus proposed that such a methodological approach may decolonise colonial concepts of international law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas
Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信