2000-2004年体育师范生伤害风险的回顾性分析

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
M. Barendrecht, C. Barten, B. Smits-Engelsman, W. Mechelen, E. Verhagen
{"title":"2000-2004年体育师范生伤害风险的回顾性分析","authors":"M. Barendrecht, C. Barten, B. Smits-Engelsman, W. Mechelen, E. Verhagen","doi":"10.1002/tsm2.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To identify primary target groups for injury prevention in physical education teacher education (PETE) students, risk differences between subgroups by sex and curriculum years were compared in a retrospective cohort study (2000‐2014). Injuries recorded by healthcare professionals at the medical facility of a Dutch PETE college were used to calculate overall, intra‐ and extracurricular injury prevalence per sex, curriculum years, and semesters and to compare these by logistic regression analyses. Of 1083 PETE students, 599 (55.3%) reported at least one injury during their curriculum (60.0% intracurricular). Female students had a higher risk for overall (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.77‐2.96) and for intracurricular injuries (OR 3.12, 95%CI 2.41‐4.03), but not for extracurricular injuries. Compared to the freshman year, injury risk dropped during the consecutive years (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.46‐0.67; OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.27‐0.41; OR 0.04, 95%CI 0.03‐0.07, respectively). The first semesters of the freshman and second year showed higher injury prevalence compared to two out of three consecutive semesters (P < .006). Primary target groups for injury preventive measures are freshman and female PETE students. Factors contributing to the predominantly higher intracurricular injury risks, most notably in female students, need to be investigated in prospective cohort studies, regardless of sex.","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tsm2.256","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective analysis of injury risk in physical education teacher education students between 2000‐2014\",\"authors\":\"M. Barendrecht, C. Barten, B. Smits-Engelsman, W. Mechelen, E. Verhagen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tsm2.256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To identify primary target groups for injury prevention in physical education teacher education (PETE) students, risk differences between subgroups by sex and curriculum years were compared in a retrospective cohort study (2000‐2014). Injuries recorded by healthcare professionals at the medical facility of a Dutch PETE college were used to calculate overall, intra‐ and extracurricular injury prevalence per sex, curriculum years, and semesters and to compare these by logistic regression analyses. Of 1083 PETE students, 599 (55.3%) reported at least one injury during their curriculum (60.0% intracurricular). Female students had a higher risk for overall (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.77‐2.96) and for intracurricular injuries (OR 3.12, 95%CI 2.41‐4.03), but not for extracurricular injuries. Compared to the freshman year, injury risk dropped during the consecutive years (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.46‐0.67; OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.27‐0.41; OR 0.04, 95%CI 0.03‐0.07, respectively). The first semesters of the freshman and second year showed higher injury prevalence compared to two out of three consecutive semesters (P < .006). Primary target groups for injury preventive measures are freshman and female PETE students. Factors contributing to the predominantly higher intracurricular injury risks, most notably in female students, need to be investigated in prospective cohort studies, regardless of sex.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational sports medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tsm2.256\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational sports medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了确定体育教师教育(PETE)学生伤害预防的主要目标群体,在一项回顾性队列研究(2000-2014)中比较了按性别和课程年限划分的亚组之间的风险差异。荷兰皮特学院医疗机构的医疗专业人员记录的伤害被用于计算每个性别、课程年限和学期的总体、校内和课外伤害发生率,并通过逻辑回归分析进行比较。在1083名PETE学生中,599名(55.3%)报告在课程中至少有一次受伤(60.0%为校内受伤)。女生的总体风险(OR 2.29,95%CI 1.77‐2.96)和心内损伤风险(OR 3.12,95%CI 2.41‐4.03)较高,但课外损伤风险不高。与大一相比,受伤风险在连续几年下降(OR分别为0.56,95%CI 0.46‐0.67;OR分别为0.33,95%CI 0.27‐0.41;OR分别是0.04,95%CI 0.03‐0.07)。与连续三个学期中的两个相比,大一和大二的第一个学期显示出更高的伤害发生率(P<.006)。伤害预防措施的主要目标群体是大一和女性PETE学生。无论性别如何,都需要在前瞻性队列研究中调查导致主要较高的囊内损伤风险的因素,尤其是在女学生中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A retrospective analysis of injury risk in physical education teacher education students between 2000‐2014
To identify primary target groups for injury prevention in physical education teacher education (PETE) students, risk differences between subgroups by sex and curriculum years were compared in a retrospective cohort study (2000‐2014). Injuries recorded by healthcare professionals at the medical facility of a Dutch PETE college were used to calculate overall, intra‐ and extracurricular injury prevalence per sex, curriculum years, and semesters and to compare these by logistic regression analyses. Of 1083 PETE students, 599 (55.3%) reported at least one injury during their curriculum (60.0% intracurricular). Female students had a higher risk for overall (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.77‐2.96) and for intracurricular injuries (OR 3.12, 95%CI 2.41‐4.03), but not for extracurricular injuries. Compared to the freshman year, injury risk dropped during the consecutive years (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.46‐0.67; OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.27‐0.41; OR 0.04, 95%CI 0.03‐0.07, respectively). The first semesters of the freshman and second year showed higher injury prevalence compared to two out of three consecutive semesters (P < .006). Primary target groups for injury preventive measures are freshman and female PETE students. Factors contributing to the predominantly higher intracurricular injury risks, most notably in female students, need to be investigated in prospective cohort studies, regardless of sex.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信