存在同伴效应的座位优化分配：来自就业培训计划的证据

IF 3.9 1区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Journal of Labor Economics Pub Date : 2022-03-22 DOI:10.1086/719968

M. Baird, J. Engberg, Isaac M Opper

{"title":"存在同伴效应的座位优化分配：来自就业培训计划的证据","authors":"M. Baird, J. Engberg, Isaac M Opper","doi":"10.1086/719968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We model optimal treatment assignment in programs with a limited number of seats and study how the presence of peer effects impacts the optimal allocation rule. We then use data from a randomized control trial to show evidence that there are large peer effects in the context of job training for disadvantaged adults in the United States. Finally, we combine the model and the empirics to show that the program would have had a much greater impact if the assignment choices had accounted for the peer effects.","PeriodicalId":48308,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Labor Economics","volume":"41 1","pages":"479 - 509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Allocation of Seats in the Presence of Peer Effects: Evidence from a Job Training Program\",\"authors\":\"M. Baird, J. Engberg, Isaac M Opper\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/719968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We model optimal treatment assignment in programs with a limited number of seats and study how the presence of peer effects impacts the optimal allocation rule. We then use data from a randomized control trial to show evidence that there are large peer effects in the context of job training for disadvantaged adults in the United States. Finally, we combine the model and the empirics to show that the program would have had a much greater impact if the assignment choices had accounted for the peer effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Labor Economics\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"479 - 509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Labor Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/719968\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Labor Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719968","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

我们对座位数量有限的项目中的最优治疗分配进行了建模，并研究了同伴效应的存在如何影响最优分配规则。然后，我们使用一项随机对照试验的数据来证明，在美国弱势成年人的职业培训中存在巨大的同伴效应。最后，我们将模型和经验相结合，表明如果任务选择考虑了同伴效应，该计划将产生更大的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Optimal Allocation of Seats in the Presence of Peer Effects: Evidence from a Job Training Program

We model optimal treatment assignment in programs with a limited number of seats and study how the presence of peer effects impacts the optimal allocation rule. We then use data from a randomized control trial to show evidence that there are large peer effects in the context of job training for disadvantaged adults in the United States. Finally, we combine the model and the empirics to show that the program would have had a much greater impact if the assignment choices had accounted for the peer effects.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Labor Economics Multiple-

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

2.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since 1983, the Journal of Labor Economics has presented international research that examines issues affecting the economy as well as social and private behavior. The Journal publishes both theoretical and applied research results relating to the U.S. and international data. And its contributors investigate various aspects of labor economics, including supply and demand of labor services, personnel economics, distribution of income, unions and collective bargaining, applied and policy issues in labor economics, and labor markets and demographics.