{"title":"规定的燃烧后加入吲唑火焰可加强对绒毛溴的控制","authors":"Rachel H. Seedorf, Shannon L. Clark, S. Nissen","doi":"10.1017/inp.2022.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) is a highly invasive winter annual grass that can fill open niches in native plant communities. Prescribed burning is often used to control B. tectorum and can be combined with herbicide treatments to extend the duration of control and promote the native plant community. Several herbicides have been evaluated in conjunction with burning for B. tectorum control, although the herbicide indaziflam has not. In September 2017, two B. tectorum–infested sites were burned in Colorado foothill shrublands. In March 2018, indaziflam was applied alone or in combination with glyphosate, rimsulfuron, or imazapic. These treatments were compared with imazapic plus glyphosate as a standard. All treatments were made within burned and non-burned areas in a crossed-nested design. Bromus tectorum cover and the desirable plant community responses were evaluated 1 and 2 yr after treatment (YAT). In non-burned areas, all indaziflam treatments reduced B. tectorum cover compared with the control. In contrast, reductions from the imazapic treatments did not persist after the first year. Most post-burn treatments further decreased B. tectorum cover compared with the non-burned treatments. The most effective treatments (indaziflam 44 and 73 g ai ha–1 + imazapic 123 g ae ha–1) provided similar levels of control (<1% B. tectorum cover at 2 YAT), with or without burning. Desirable plant cover, richness, and diversity were not negatively impacted by burning or herbicide treatments. Plant diversity and species richness increased at Site 2 when burning was followed by indaziflam treatments. This study indicates that B. tectorum control using indaziflam can be enhanced when applied after burning, and the combinations with imazapic or rimsulfuron provide a wider application window compared with the combination with glyphosate.","PeriodicalId":14470,"journal":{"name":"Invasive Plant Science and Management","volume":"15 1","pages":"72 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribed burning followed by indaziflam enhances downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control\",\"authors\":\"Rachel H. Seedorf, Shannon L. Clark, S. Nissen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/inp.2022.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) is a highly invasive winter annual grass that can fill open niches in native plant communities. Prescribed burning is often used to control B. tectorum and can be combined with herbicide treatments to extend the duration of control and promote the native plant community. Several herbicides have been evaluated in conjunction with burning for B. tectorum control, although the herbicide indaziflam has not. In September 2017, two B. tectorum–infested sites were burned in Colorado foothill shrublands. In March 2018, indaziflam was applied alone or in combination with glyphosate, rimsulfuron, or imazapic. These treatments were compared with imazapic plus glyphosate as a standard. All treatments were made within burned and non-burned areas in a crossed-nested design. Bromus tectorum cover and the desirable plant community responses were evaluated 1 and 2 yr after treatment (YAT). In non-burned areas, all indaziflam treatments reduced B. tectorum cover compared with the control. In contrast, reductions from the imazapic treatments did not persist after the first year. Most post-burn treatments further decreased B. tectorum cover compared with the non-burned treatments. The most effective treatments (indaziflam 44 and 73 g ai ha–1 + imazapic 123 g ae ha–1) provided similar levels of control (<1% B. tectorum cover at 2 YAT), with or without burning. Desirable plant cover, richness, and diversity were not negatively impacted by burning or herbicide treatments. Plant diversity and species richness increased at Site 2 when burning was followed by indaziflam treatments. This study indicates that B. tectorum control using indaziflam can be enhanced when applied after burning, and the combinations with imazapic or rimsulfuron provide a wider application window compared with the combination with glyphosate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Invasive Plant Science and Management\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Invasive Plant Science and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2022.11\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Invasive Plant Science and Management","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2022.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
Downy brome(Bromus tectorum L.)是一种高度入侵的冬季一年生草本植物,可以填补当地植物群落的开放生态位。规定的焚烧通常用于控制B.tectorum,并可与除草剂处理相结合,以延长控制时间并促进本地植物群落。一些除草剂已经与燃烧一起进行了评估,以控制B.tectorum,尽管除草剂吲唑火焰没有。2017年9月,科罗拉多山麓灌木丛中的两处广受B.tectorum侵扰的地点被烧毁。2018年3月,吲唑福明单独使用或与草甘膦、林磺隆或伊玛扎匹克联合使用。将这些处理与伊玛扎平加草甘膦作为标准进行比较。所有处理均在烧伤和非烧伤区域内进行,采用交叉嵌套设计。在处理(YAT)后1年和2年,对遮羞草覆盖和理想的植物群落反应进行了评估。在非烧伤区,与对照组相比,所有吲唑福明处理都减少了覆盖率。相比之下,第一年后,伊玛扎治疗的减少并没有持续。与未烧伤处理相比,大多数烧伤后处理进一步降低了覆盖层。最有效的治疗方法(吲唑福明44和73 g ai ha–1+伊玛扎匹克123 g ae ha–1)提供了相似水平的控制(2 YAT时<1%的B.tectorum覆盖率),无论是否燃烧。理想的植物覆盖率、丰富度和多样性没有受到焚烧或除草剂处理的负面影响。当焚烧后进行吲唑火焰处理时,地点2的植物多样性和物种丰富度增加。这项研究表明,燃烧后使用吲唑福明可以加强对B.tectorum的控制,与草甘膦组合相比,与伊玛扎匹克或金磺隆组合提供了更宽的应用窗口。
Prescribed burning followed by indaziflam enhances downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control
Abstract Downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) is a highly invasive winter annual grass that can fill open niches in native plant communities. Prescribed burning is often used to control B. tectorum and can be combined with herbicide treatments to extend the duration of control and promote the native plant community. Several herbicides have been evaluated in conjunction with burning for B. tectorum control, although the herbicide indaziflam has not. In September 2017, two B. tectorum–infested sites were burned in Colorado foothill shrublands. In March 2018, indaziflam was applied alone or in combination with glyphosate, rimsulfuron, or imazapic. These treatments were compared with imazapic plus glyphosate as a standard. All treatments were made within burned and non-burned areas in a crossed-nested design. Bromus tectorum cover and the desirable plant community responses were evaluated 1 and 2 yr after treatment (YAT). In non-burned areas, all indaziflam treatments reduced B. tectorum cover compared with the control. In contrast, reductions from the imazapic treatments did not persist after the first year. Most post-burn treatments further decreased B. tectorum cover compared with the non-burned treatments. The most effective treatments (indaziflam 44 and 73 g ai ha–1 + imazapic 123 g ae ha–1) provided similar levels of control (<1% B. tectorum cover at 2 YAT), with or without burning. Desirable plant cover, richness, and diversity were not negatively impacted by burning or herbicide treatments. Plant diversity and species richness increased at Site 2 when burning was followed by indaziflam treatments. This study indicates that B. tectorum control using indaziflam can be enhanced when applied after burning, and the combinations with imazapic or rimsulfuron provide a wider application window compared with the combination with glyphosate.
期刊介绍:
Invasive Plant Science and Management (IPSM) is an online peer-reviewed journal focusing on fundamental and applied research on invasive plant biology, ecology, management, and restoration of invaded non-crop areas, and on other aspects relevant to invasive species, including educational activities and policy issues. Topics include the biology and ecology of invasive plants in rangeland, prairie, pasture, wildland, forestry, riparian, wetland, aquatic, recreational, rights-of-ways, and other non-crop (parks, preserves, natural areas) settings; genetics of invasive plants; social, ecological, and economic impacts of invasive plants and their management; design, efficacy, and integration of control tools; land restoration and rehabilitation; effects of management on soil, air, water, and wildlife; education, extension, and outreach methods and resources; technology and product reports; mapping and remote sensing, inventory and monitoring; technology transfer tools; case study reports; and regulatory issues.