咖啡树下的土壤螨及其对豆科不同种类有机质进入土壤的响应

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Thialgo A.F. Carvalho, P. R. Reis, L. Bernardi, P. Marafeli, P. Martínez
{"title":"咖啡树下的土壤螨及其对豆科不同种类有机质进入土壤的响应","authors":"Thialgo A.F. Carvalho, P. R. Reis, L. Bernardi, P. Marafeli, P. Martínez","doi":"10.21684/0132-8077-2018-26-2-183-195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence and abundance of mites in the soil beneath cultivated coffee trees (Coffea arabica L.). In particular, we compared mite communities in three different soil environments: 1) native forest; 2) soils from underneath the coffee trees “under full sun” (i.e. areas that received no additional shade or organic treatment); 3) soils that incorporated organic matter from four leguminous windbreak plant species — acacia, Acacia mangium Wild.; pigeon pea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.; gliricidia, Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp.; and leucaena, Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. Sampling was conducted at the ends of the dry and rainy seasons, in São Sebastião do Paraíso, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Undisturbed soil samples were acquired using a cylinder and a Berlese-Tullgren funnel was used to extract the mites in the laboratory. A total of 1,014 mite specimens, assigned into 143 different species, were collected. The forest soil had the greatest richness and total abundance of edaphic mites, while the coffee plantation soils, enriched with acacia, had the lowest richness and abundance. The mite communities of treated soils were less than 18% similar to that of the forest soil. These results suggest that the substitution of native forests with cultivated systems can cause significant changes in the abundance, richness and structuring of edaphic mite communities, particularly of oribatid mites. Maintenance of mite communities should be one of the goals of agricultural practices, since these organisms are important for maintenance of biological cycles, especially for the decomposition of organic matter.","PeriodicalId":39162,"journal":{"name":"Acarina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EDAPHIC MITES AND THEIR RESPONSE TO THE INCORPORATION OF ORGANIC MATTER FROM VARIOUS SPECIES OF FABACEAE INTO THE SOIL BENEATH COFFEE TREES\",\"authors\":\"Thialgo A.F. Carvalho, P. R. Reis, L. Bernardi, P. Marafeli, P. Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.21684/0132-8077-2018-26-2-183-195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence and abundance of mites in the soil beneath cultivated coffee trees (Coffea arabica L.). In particular, we compared mite communities in three different soil environments: 1) native forest; 2) soils from underneath the coffee trees “under full sun” (i.e. areas that received no additional shade or organic treatment); 3) soils that incorporated organic matter from four leguminous windbreak plant species — acacia, Acacia mangium Wild.; pigeon pea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.; gliricidia, Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp.; and leucaena, Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. Sampling was conducted at the ends of the dry and rainy seasons, in São Sebastião do Paraíso, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Undisturbed soil samples were acquired using a cylinder and a Berlese-Tullgren funnel was used to extract the mites in the laboratory. A total of 1,014 mite specimens, assigned into 143 different species, were collected. The forest soil had the greatest richness and total abundance of edaphic mites, while the coffee plantation soils, enriched with acacia, had the lowest richness and abundance. The mite communities of treated soils were less than 18% similar to that of the forest soil. These results suggest that the substitution of native forests with cultivated systems can cause significant changes in the abundance, richness and structuring of edaphic mite communities, particularly of oribatid mites. Maintenance of mite communities should be one of the goals of agricultural practices, since these organisms are important for maintenance of biological cycles, especially for the decomposition of organic matter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acarina\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acarina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21684/0132-8077-2018-26-2-183-195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acarina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21684/0132-8077-2018-26-2-183-195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估栽培咖啡树(Coffea arabica L.)下土壤中螨的存在和丰度。特别是,我们比较了三种不同土壤环境中的螨群落:1)原生森林;2) 咖啡树下“阳光充足”的土壤(即没有额外遮荫或有机处理的区域);3) 含有四种豆科防风植物的有机物的土壤——金合欢、芒果金合欢。;鸽子豌豆。;gliricidia,gliricidia sepium(Jacq.)沃尔普。;和银合欢,银合欢(Lam.)de Wit。采样是在旱季和雨季结束时在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州的São Sebastião do Paraíso进行的。使用圆柱体采集未扰动土壤样本,并在实验室中使用Berlese-Tullgren漏斗提取螨虫。共收集了1014个螨类标本,分为143个不同的物种。森林土壤的土壤中土壤螨的丰富度和总丰度最高,而富含阿拉伯胶的咖啡种植园土壤的丰富度和丰度最低。处理土壤的螨类群落与森林土壤的相似性不到18%。这些结果表明,用栽培系统取代原生森林会导致土壤螨群落,特别是甲螨群落的丰度、丰富度和结构发生重大变化。维护螨群落应该是农业实践的目标之一,因为这些生物对维持生物循环,特别是对有机物的分解很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EDAPHIC MITES AND THEIR RESPONSE TO THE INCORPORATION OF ORGANIC MATTER FROM VARIOUS SPECIES OF FABACEAE INTO THE SOIL BENEATH COFFEE TREES
The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence and abundance of mites in the soil beneath cultivated coffee trees (Coffea arabica L.). In particular, we compared mite communities in three different soil environments: 1) native forest; 2) soils from underneath the coffee trees “under full sun” (i.e. areas that received no additional shade or organic treatment); 3) soils that incorporated organic matter from four leguminous windbreak plant species — acacia, Acacia mangium Wild.; pigeon pea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.; gliricidia, Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp.; and leucaena, Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. Sampling was conducted at the ends of the dry and rainy seasons, in São Sebastião do Paraíso, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Undisturbed soil samples were acquired using a cylinder and a Berlese-Tullgren funnel was used to extract the mites in the laboratory. A total of 1,014 mite specimens, assigned into 143 different species, were collected. The forest soil had the greatest richness and total abundance of edaphic mites, while the coffee plantation soils, enriched with acacia, had the lowest richness and abundance. The mite communities of treated soils were less than 18% similar to that of the forest soil. These results suggest that the substitution of native forests with cultivated systems can cause significant changes in the abundance, richness and structuring of edaphic mite communities, particularly of oribatid mites. Maintenance of mite communities should be one of the goals of agricultural practices, since these organisms are important for maintenance of biological cycles, especially for the decomposition of organic matter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acarina
Acarina Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信