否认疫情有帮助还是有伤害?对新冠肺炎的信仰和经历是影响使用神经防御机制的心理后果的因素

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
I. Kaźmierczak, Irena Jelonkiewicz-Sterianos, Iwona Nowakowska, Joanna Rajchert, A. Zajenkowska, Adrianna Jakubowska, Marta Bodecka-Zych
{"title":"否认疫情有帮助还是有伤害?对新冠肺炎的信仰和经历是影响使用神经防御机制的心理后果的因素","authors":"I. Kaźmierczak, Irena Jelonkiewicz-Sterianos, Iwona Nowakowska, Joanna Rajchert, A. Zajenkowska, Adrianna Jakubowska, Marta Bodecka-Zych","doi":"10.15557/pipk.2022.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic may activate thoughts of death, leading to aversive psychological states. In such situations, defence mechanisms emerge; however, their adaptability depends on many factors. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between neurotic defence style and depressive symptoms. We assumed that the sense of coherence underlies this correlation and investigated how both believing (or not) in COVID-19 and having (or not) experience of this disease differentiate this mechanism. Methods: This cross-sectional study (N = 720) was conducted through an online panel. Results: For COVID-19 believers who had no experience of the disease, the higher their neurotic defence style, the lower their sense of coherence, which was negatively correlated with depressive symptoms. The same pattern was found for non-believers who have experienced COVID-19. In the group of individuals who believed and experienced COVID-19, the relationship between neurotic defence style and sense of coherence was non-significant. In turn, respondents who neither believed in nor have experienced COVID-19 displayed a positive relationship between neurotic defence style and sense of coherence. Discussion: Although self-deception strategies might be adaptive, they contribute to increased distress, if continued to be used once an individual confronts reality.","PeriodicalId":42849,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does pandemic denial help or harm? Belief in and experience of COVID-19 as factors affecting psychological consequences of using neurotic defence mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"I. Kaźmierczak, Irena Jelonkiewicz-Sterianos, Iwona Nowakowska, Joanna Rajchert, A. Zajenkowska, Adrianna Jakubowska, Marta Bodecka-Zych\",\"doi\":\"10.15557/pipk.2022.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic may activate thoughts of death, leading to aversive psychological states. In such situations, defence mechanisms emerge; however, their adaptability depends on many factors. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between neurotic defence style and depressive symptoms. We assumed that the sense of coherence underlies this correlation and investigated how both believing (or not) in COVID-19 and having (or not) experience of this disease differentiate this mechanism. Methods: This cross-sectional study (N = 720) was conducted through an online panel. Results: For COVID-19 believers who had no experience of the disease, the higher their neurotic defence style, the lower their sense of coherence, which was negatively correlated with depressive symptoms. The same pattern was found for non-believers who have experienced COVID-19. In the group of individuals who believed and experienced COVID-19, the relationship between neurotic defence style and sense of coherence was non-significant. In turn, respondents who neither believed in nor have experienced COVID-19 displayed a positive relationship between neurotic defence style and sense of coherence. Discussion: Although self-deception strategies might be adaptive, they contribute to increased distress, if continued to be used once an individual confronts reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15557/pipk.2022.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15557/pipk.2022.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新冠肺炎大流行可能激活死亡思想,导致厌恶的心理状态。在这种情况下,出现了防御机制;然而,它们的适应性取决于许多因素。本研究旨在探讨神经防御方式与抑郁症状之间的关系。我们假设连贯感是这种相关性的基础,并研究了相信(或不相信)新冠肺炎和有(或不)这种疾病的经历如何区分这种机制。方法:这项横断面研究(N=720)通过在线小组进行。结果:对于没有疾病经历的新冠肺炎信徒,他们的神经质防御风格越高,他们的连贯感就越低,这与抑郁症状呈负相关。经历过新冠肺炎的非信徒也发现了同样的模式。在相信并经历过新冠肺炎的个体组中,神经质的防御风格与连贯感之间的关系不显著。反过来,既不相信也没有经历过新冠肺炎的受访者表现出神经质的防御风格与连贯感之间的积极关系。讨论:尽管自我欺骗策略可能是自适应的,但如果在个人面对现实时继续使用,它们会增加痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does pandemic denial help or harm? Belief in and experience of COVID-19 as factors affecting psychological consequences of using neurotic defence mechanisms
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic may activate thoughts of death, leading to aversive psychological states. In such situations, defence mechanisms emerge; however, their adaptability depends on many factors. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between neurotic defence style and depressive symptoms. We assumed that the sense of coherence underlies this correlation and investigated how both believing (or not) in COVID-19 and having (or not) experience of this disease differentiate this mechanism. Methods: This cross-sectional study (N = 720) was conducted through an online panel. Results: For COVID-19 believers who had no experience of the disease, the higher their neurotic defence style, the lower their sense of coherence, which was negatively correlated with depressive symptoms. The same pattern was found for non-believers who have experienced COVID-19. In the group of individuals who believed and experienced COVID-19, the relationship between neurotic defence style and sense of coherence was non-significant. In turn, respondents who neither believed in nor have experienced COVID-19 displayed a positive relationship between neurotic defence style and sense of coherence. Discussion: Although self-deception strategies might be adaptive, they contribute to increased distress, if continued to be used once an individual confronts reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: PSYCHIATRIA I PSYCHOLOGIA KLINICZNA is an international peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing original articles that constitute significant contributions to the advancements of psychiatry and psychology. In addition, PSYCHIATRIA I PSYCHOLOGIA KLINICZNA publishes information from the medical associations, reports and materials from international congresses, letters to the Editor, information on new medical products as well as abstracts and discussions on papers published in other scientific journals, reviews of books and other publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信