为什么要把老死人留在身边?

Q1 Arts and Humanities
A. Ion
{"title":"为什么要把老死人留在身边?","authors":"A. Ion","doi":"10.4312/dp.47.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to focus on the ways in which communities imagined their relationship with the dead throughout the Balkan area during the Neolithic and Eneolithic (6200–3800 cal BC). My claim is that we should go beyond seeing the human remains discovered in settlements as unusual/atypical/non-funerary discoveries. Instead, they can be read as traces of complex funerary practices, which contributed to the creation and manipulation of collective identities. The dead became part of a place-making strategy, they fixed time and become central to certain kinds of assemblages, which in turn were meant to create more powerful ancestors who could intervene in the present.","PeriodicalId":38599,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Praehistorica","volume":"47 1","pages":"348-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Keep the Old Dead Around?\",\"authors\":\"A. Ion\",\"doi\":\"10.4312/dp.47.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this article is to focus on the ways in which communities imagined their relationship with the dead throughout the Balkan area during the Neolithic and Eneolithic (6200–3800 cal BC). My claim is that we should go beyond seeing the human remains discovered in settlements as unusual/atypical/non-funerary discoveries. Instead, they can be read as traces of complex funerary practices, which contributed to the creation and manipulation of collective identities. The dead became part of a place-making strategy, they fixed time and become central to certain kinds of assemblages, which in turn were meant to create more powerful ancestors who could intervene in the present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Documenta Praehistorica\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"348-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Documenta Praehistorica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.47.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documenta Praehistorica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.47.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章的目的是关注在新石器时代和新石器时代(公元前6200-3800 cal),整个巴尔干地区的社区如何想象他们与死者的关系。我的观点是,我们应该超越把在定居点发现的人类遗骸视为不寻常的/非典型的/非葬礼的发现。相反,它们可以被解读为复杂的丧葬习俗的痕迹,这有助于创造和操纵集体身份。死者成为了一种定位策略的一部分,他们固定了时间,成为某些集合的中心,这反过来又意味着创造出更强大的祖先,可以干预现在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Keep the Old Dead Around?
The aim of this article is to focus on the ways in which communities imagined their relationship with the dead throughout the Balkan area during the Neolithic and Eneolithic (6200–3800 cal BC). My claim is that we should go beyond seeing the human remains discovered in settlements as unusual/atypical/non-funerary discoveries. Instead, they can be read as traces of complex funerary practices, which contributed to the creation and manipulation of collective identities. The dead became part of a place-making strategy, they fixed time and become central to certain kinds of assemblages, which in turn were meant to create more powerful ancestors who could intervene in the present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Documenta Praehistorica
Documenta Praehistorica Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信