Q3 Social Sciences
Decyzje Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.139
Agata Sobków, Jakub Figol, Jakub Traczyk
{"title":"Zdolności numeryczne jako kluczowe zdolności poznawcze w procesie podejmowania decyzji","authors":"Agata Sobków, Jakub Figol, Jakub Traczyk","doi":"10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the present paper is to review recent theoretical models and empirical studies on the role of numeracy (i.e., cognitive ability in processing numerical information) in decision making under risk and uncertainty. The research conducted in the last decade points that numeracy is the most robust predictor of making good decisions, which predictions are independent of other psychological constructs or cognitive abilities (such as fluid intelligence or cognitive reflection). The pivotal role of numeracy has been described in at least three theoretical models: Fuzzy-Trace Theory, Skilled Decision Theory, and Multiple Numeric Competencies model. Furthermore, the results of numerous research indicate that better decisions made by people with high numeracy are underpinned by various psychological mechanisms of the cognitive, motivational, and affective nature. Findings related to the performance of people with high and low numeracy served to develop both immediate (e.g., visual aids or an experience-based format of risk communication) and long-term (e.g., cognitive training) methods of improving the decision-making process. Based on these decision aids, we can effectively support people with low numeracy in an accurate risk assessment, risk comprehension, and making better decisions","PeriodicalId":37255,"journal":{"name":"Decyzje","volume":"1 1","pages":"25-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decyzje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是回顾最近关于计算能力(即处理数字信息的认知能力)在风险和不确定性下决策中的作用的理论模型和实证研究。过去十年进行的研究指出,计算能力是做出正确决策最可靠的预测因素,这种预测与其他心理结构或认知能力(如流体智力或认知反射)无关。至少有三个理论模型描述了计算能力的关键作用:模糊追踪理论、熟练决策理论和多重数字能力模型。此外,许多研究结果表明,高计算能力的人做出更好的决策是由认知、动机和情感性质的各种心理机制支撑的。与计算能力高和低的人的表现有关的研究结果有助于开发改善决策过程的即时(例如,视觉辅助或基于经验的风险沟通格式)和长期(例如,认知训练)方法。基于这些决策辅助工具,我们可以有效地支持计算能力差的人进行准确的风险评估、风险理解和做出更好的决策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Zdolności numeryczne jako kluczowe zdolności poznawcze w procesie podejmowania decyzji
The goal of the present paper is to review recent theoretical models and empirical studies on the role of numeracy (i.e., cognitive ability in processing numerical information) in decision making under risk and uncertainty. The research conducted in the last decade points that numeracy is the most robust predictor of making good decisions, which predictions are independent of other psychological constructs or cognitive abilities (such as fluid intelligence or cognitive reflection). The pivotal role of numeracy has been described in at least three theoretical models: Fuzzy-Trace Theory, Skilled Decision Theory, and Multiple Numeric Competencies model. Furthermore, the results of numerous research indicate that better decisions made by people with high numeracy are underpinned by various psychological mechanisms of the cognitive, motivational, and affective nature. Findings related to the performance of people with high and low numeracy served to develop both immediate (e.g., visual aids or an experience-based format of risk communication) and long-term (e.g., cognitive training) methods of improving the decision-making process. Based on these decision aids, we can effectively support people with low numeracy in an accurate risk assessment, risk comprehension, and making better decisions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decyzje
Decyzje Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信