阈下冲击学习:反向映射练习

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Sudheer Sudhakaran, Anjali A.
{"title":"阈下冲击学习:反向映射练习","authors":"Sudheer Sudhakaran, Anjali A.","doi":"10.1177/22779779211006802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study looks at the phenomenon of avoidance as a behaviour and as a strategy applied in an academic context in the case of final year management students sitting for their end-term exam where multiple questions are offered and the students are allowed to choose and attempt answers for selected questions. Why did they not answer it is for teachers to chew the cud. The case looks at how educators need to realign their perspectives and improve subsequent class delivery in terms of realigned content emphasis and pedagogical initiatives after papers have been evaluated and marked. The article suggests that accreditation processes should take note of the impact on overall academic measurement of program performance. Research question Research question for which perspectives have been opened up for curated answers are: How to discover topics requiring teachers to introspect and reimagine their classroom delivery and their engagement strategies? The principle of inversion brings into relief these discoveries. Theory: The study draws on psychological and physical sciences wherein multiple theories explain why a particular path has been eschewed. Type of the case: The case study strategy draws on the experiences of both the researchers and the participants and therefore the orientation of this case is primarily heuristic. Purposive data samples were used accessing data in the academic databases related to 198 students for the core compulsory course related to Sales and Distribution Management. Basis of the case: Actual score sheets for all 198 students for their final exam mapped for each question. Therefore, concepts for each question have been assessed. Using the principle of inversion/reversal the complementary gaps have been discovered, quantified, and interpreted. Findings: From the complementary data, it becomes self-explanatory for an educator that the blind spots—gaps in understanding—have been identified for future course corrections in delivery and engagement. Discussions: The avenues to be taken is food for thought for each educator and the audience to be addressed. Meaningful eye-opening gaps have been identified for future courses of action depending on concept to be redelivered. These findings have implications for all accreditation processes.","PeriodicalId":37487,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/22779779211006802","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subliminal Shock Learning: An Inverted Remapping Exercise\",\"authors\":\"Sudheer Sudhakaran, Anjali A.\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22779779211006802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study looks at the phenomenon of avoidance as a behaviour and as a strategy applied in an academic context in the case of final year management students sitting for their end-term exam where multiple questions are offered and the students are allowed to choose and attempt answers for selected questions. Why did they not answer it is for teachers to chew the cud. The case looks at how educators need to realign their perspectives and improve subsequent class delivery in terms of realigned content emphasis and pedagogical initiatives after papers have been evaluated and marked. The article suggests that accreditation processes should take note of the impact on overall academic measurement of program performance. Research question Research question for which perspectives have been opened up for curated answers are: How to discover topics requiring teachers to introspect and reimagine their classroom delivery and their engagement strategies? The principle of inversion brings into relief these discoveries. Theory: The study draws on psychological and physical sciences wherein multiple theories explain why a particular path has been eschewed. Type of the case: The case study strategy draws on the experiences of both the researchers and the participants and therefore the orientation of this case is primarily heuristic. Purposive data samples were used accessing data in the academic databases related to 198 students for the core compulsory course related to Sales and Distribution Management. Basis of the case: Actual score sheets for all 198 students for their final exam mapped for each question. Therefore, concepts for each question have been assessed. Using the principle of inversion/reversal the complementary gaps have been discovered, quantified, and interpreted. Findings: From the complementary data, it becomes self-explanatory for an educator that the blind spots—gaps in understanding—have been identified for future course corrections in delivery and engagement. Discussions: The avenues to be taken is food for thought for each educator and the audience to be addressed. Meaningful eye-opening gaps have been identified for future courses of action depending on concept to be redelivered. These findings have implications for all accreditation processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/22779779211006802\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779211006802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779211006802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究将回避现象视为一种行为和一种策略,应用于期末管理系学生参加期末考试的情况,期末考试提供了多个问题,学生可以选择并尝试所选问题的答案。他们为什么不回答,这是老师们的苦思冥想。该案例着眼于在论文经过评估和评分后,教育工作者需要如何重新调整他们的观点,并在重新调整内容重点和教学举措方面改进后续课堂教学。文章建议,认证过程应注意对项目绩效的整体学术衡量的影响。研究问题为策划答案开辟了视角的研究问题是:如何发现需要教师反思和重新构想课堂教学和参与策略的主题?反演原理使这些发现变得令人宽慰。理论:这项研究借鉴了心理和物理科学,其中多种理论解释了为什么要避开某条特定的道路。案例类型:案例研究策略借鉴了研究人员和参与者的经验,因此本案例的方向主要是启发式的。使用目的性数据样本访问学术数据库中与198名销售和分销管理核心必修课学生相关的数据。案例依据:198名学生期末考试的实际成绩表,为每道题绘制。因此,对每个问题的概念进行了评估。利用反演/反演原理,发现、量化和解释了互补间隙。研究结果:从补充数据中,教育工作者可以不言自明地发现,在未来的课程教学和参与中,盲点——理解上的差距——已经被确定。讨论:要采取的途径是每个教育工作者和听众思考的食物。根据要重新交付的概念,已经为未来的行动方案确定了有意义的令人大开眼界的差距。这些发现对所有认证过程都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subliminal Shock Learning: An Inverted Remapping Exercise
This study looks at the phenomenon of avoidance as a behaviour and as a strategy applied in an academic context in the case of final year management students sitting for their end-term exam where multiple questions are offered and the students are allowed to choose and attempt answers for selected questions. Why did they not answer it is for teachers to chew the cud. The case looks at how educators need to realign their perspectives and improve subsequent class delivery in terms of realigned content emphasis and pedagogical initiatives after papers have been evaluated and marked. The article suggests that accreditation processes should take note of the impact on overall academic measurement of program performance. Research question Research question for which perspectives have been opened up for curated answers are: How to discover topics requiring teachers to introspect and reimagine their classroom delivery and their engagement strategies? The principle of inversion brings into relief these discoveries. Theory: The study draws on psychological and physical sciences wherein multiple theories explain why a particular path has been eschewed. Type of the case: The case study strategy draws on the experiences of both the researchers and the participants and therefore the orientation of this case is primarily heuristic. Purposive data samples were used accessing data in the academic databases related to 198 students for the core compulsory course related to Sales and Distribution Management. Basis of the case: Actual score sheets for all 198 students for their final exam mapped for each question. Therefore, concepts for each question have been assessed. Using the principle of inversion/reversal the complementary gaps have been discovered, quantified, and interpreted. Findings: From the complementary data, it becomes self-explanatory for an educator that the blind spots—gaps in understanding—have been identified for future course corrections in delivery and engagement. Discussions: The avenues to be taken is food for thought for each educator and the audience to be addressed. Meaningful eye-opening gaps have been identified for future courses of action depending on concept to be redelivered. These findings have implications for all accreditation processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases
South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases (SAJBMC) is a peer-reviewed, tri-annual journal of Birla Institute of Management Technology, Greater Noida (India). The journal aims to provide a space for high-quality original research or analytical cases, evidence-based case studies, comparative studies on industry sectors, products, and practical applications of management concepts. The journal likes to publish problem-solving, decisional and applied types of cases. Such cases must have linkage with theory, at least one dilemma (also known as case issue) and a protagonist around whom the case issue will revolve. Publication of pure research, applied research and field studies with empirical data do not fall under the domain of SAJBMC. Fictitious cases are not welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信