预先模型测定含枸杞皮地方母羊日粮消化蛋白和总可消化养分的准确性

I. Hernaman, Furi Siti Fauziyah Hasanah, Rida Septiana, Rendhy Ardiansyah, R. B. A. Eryanto, T. Dhalika, R. Hidayat, Ana Rochana Tarmidi
{"title":"预先模型测定含枸杞皮地方母羊日粮消化蛋白和总可消化养分的准确性","authors":"I. Hernaman, Furi Siti Fauziyah Hasanah, Rida Septiana, Rendhy Ardiansyah, R. B. A. Eryanto, T. Dhalika, R. Hidayat, Ana Rochana Tarmidi","doi":"10.23960/JIPT.V9I2.P129-138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of digested protein and total digestible nutrient  in rations containing melinjo peels could be done using several prediction models, but testing was needed to determine the level of accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction formula for protein digestibility and total digestible nutrient from rations containing melinjo peels of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. Sixteen local ewes aged 11-12 monts with an initial body weight of 22.56 ± 1.46 kg were used to evaluate the value of digested protein and total digestible nutrient. The observational data were used to calculate the ratio of prediction to deviation value in assessing the accuracy of various prediction models for digested protein, namely Wardeh (1981) and Knight's and Harris (1966) models, while total digestible nutrient, namely Sutardi (2001), Wardeh (1981), and Harris et al. (1972) models. Wardeh (1981) and Knight and Harris’s (1966) digestible protein model, yielded ratio of prediction to deviation values of 3.28 and 3.37, respectively. Meanwhile, the ratio of prediction to deviation value on total digestible nutrient respectively from the highest value was Sutardi (2001), Wardeh (1981), and Harris et al. (1972) of 4.57, 3.68 and 1.91. In conclusion, Knight and Harris's (1966) digestible protein and Sutardi's (2001) total digestible nutrient model were the most accurate.","PeriodicalId":17809,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL ILMIAH PETERNAKAN TERPADU","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Predection Models in Determining Digested Protein and Total Digestible Nutrient on Local Ewes Ration containing Melinjo Peel\",\"authors\":\"I. Hernaman, Furi Siti Fauziyah Hasanah, Rida Septiana, Rendhy Ardiansyah, R. B. A. Eryanto, T. Dhalika, R. Hidayat, Ana Rochana Tarmidi\",\"doi\":\"10.23960/JIPT.V9I2.P129-138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evaluation of digested protein and total digestible nutrient  in rations containing melinjo peels could be done using several prediction models, but testing was needed to determine the level of accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction formula for protein digestibility and total digestible nutrient from rations containing melinjo peels of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. Sixteen local ewes aged 11-12 monts with an initial body weight of 22.56 ± 1.46 kg were used to evaluate the value of digested protein and total digestible nutrient. The observational data were used to calculate the ratio of prediction to deviation value in assessing the accuracy of various prediction models for digested protein, namely Wardeh (1981) and Knight's and Harris (1966) models, while total digestible nutrient, namely Sutardi (2001), Wardeh (1981), and Harris et al. (1972) models. Wardeh (1981) and Knight and Harris’s (1966) digestible protein model, yielded ratio of prediction to deviation values of 3.28 and 3.37, respectively. Meanwhile, the ratio of prediction to deviation value on total digestible nutrient respectively from the highest value was Sutardi (2001), Wardeh (1981), and Harris et al. (1972) of 4.57, 3.68 and 1.91. In conclusion, Knight and Harris's (1966) digestible protein and Sutardi's (2001) total digestible nutrient model were the most accurate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL ILMIAH PETERNAKAN TERPADU\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL ILMIAH PETERNAKAN TERPADU\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23960/JIPT.V9I2.P129-138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL ILMIAH PETERNAKAN TERPADU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23960/JIPT.V9I2.P129-138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可以使用几种预测模型来评估含有梅林焦皮的口粮中的消化蛋白质和总可消化营养素,但需要进行测试以确定准确性。本研究旨在评估含有5%、10%、15%和20%梅林焦皮的日粮中蛋白质消化率和总可消化营养素预测公式的准确性。16只11-12个月龄的本地母羊,初始体重为22.56±1.46kg,用于评估消化蛋白质和总可消化营养素的价值。观测数据用于计算预测值与偏差值的比率,以评估消化蛋白质的各种预测模型的准确性,即Wardeh(1981)和Knight’s and Harris(1966)模型,以及总可消化营养素,即Sutardi(2001)、Wardeh和Harris等人(1972)模型。Wardeh(1981)和Knight和Harris(1966)的可消化蛋白质模型得出的预测与偏差值之比分别为3.28和3.37。同时,总可消化营养素的预测值与最高值的偏差值之比分别为Sutardi(2001)、Wardeh(1981)和Harris等人(1972),分别为4.57、3.68和1.91。总之,Knight和Harris(1966)的可消化蛋白质和Sutardi(2001)的总可消化营养素模型是最准确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of Predection Models in Determining Digested Protein and Total Digestible Nutrient on Local Ewes Ration containing Melinjo Peel
The evaluation of digested protein and total digestible nutrient  in rations containing melinjo peels could be done using several prediction models, but testing was needed to determine the level of accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction formula for protein digestibility and total digestible nutrient from rations containing melinjo peels of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%. Sixteen local ewes aged 11-12 monts with an initial body weight of 22.56 ± 1.46 kg were used to evaluate the value of digested protein and total digestible nutrient. The observational data were used to calculate the ratio of prediction to deviation value in assessing the accuracy of various prediction models for digested protein, namely Wardeh (1981) and Knight's and Harris (1966) models, while total digestible nutrient, namely Sutardi (2001), Wardeh (1981), and Harris et al. (1972) models. Wardeh (1981) and Knight and Harris’s (1966) digestible protein model, yielded ratio of prediction to deviation values of 3.28 and 3.37, respectively. Meanwhile, the ratio of prediction to deviation value on total digestible nutrient respectively from the highest value was Sutardi (2001), Wardeh (1981), and Harris et al. (1972) of 4.57, 3.68 and 1.91. In conclusion, Knight and Harris's (1966) digestible protein and Sutardi's (2001) total digestible nutrient model were the most accurate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信