2014年至2017年间疗养院回收的细菌分离株的耐药性

S. Yun, Bareum Gwon, H. L. Hong, Hwan Seop Lim, K. Lee, I. Jang, Eun-Jeong Yoon, S. Jeong
{"title":"2014年至2017年间疗养院回收的细菌分离株的耐药性","authors":"S. Yun, Bareum Gwon, H. L. Hong, Hwan Seop Lim, K. Lee, I. Jang, Eun-Jeong Yoon, S. Jeong","doi":"10.5145/acm.2019.22.4.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an issue not only with regard to public health, but also in terms of economic impact. AMR surveillance has mainly been carried out in general hospitals, and not in nursing hospitals. This study was conducted to investigate the AMR rate for bacterial strains isolated from nursing hospital samples. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results from a total of 23,518 bacterial isolates recovered from clinical specimens taken in 61 nursing hosals were analyzed. AST was conducted using Vitek 2 with AST cards specific for the bacterial strains. Results: A total of 19,357 Gram-negative and 4,161 Gram-positive bacterial strains were isolated. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=6,384) and Escherichia coli (n= 5,468) were the most prevalent bacterial species and, among Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus (n=1,565) was common. The AMR rate was high for the following strains: cefotaxime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, 77.4%; cefotaxime-resistant E. coli, 70.6%; imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, 90.3%; imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 49.3%; oxacillin-resistant S. aureus, 81.1%, penicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, 44.8%, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, 53.5%. AMR rate change varied by bacterial species and antimicrobial drug. Conclusion: AMR rates of major pathogens from nursing hospitals were higher than those from general hospitals with the exception of imipenem-resistant A. baumannii. Continuous monitoring and infection control strategies are needed. (Ann Clin Microbiol 2019;22:96-104)","PeriodicalId":34065,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Isolates Recovered from Nursing Hospitals between 2014 and 2017\",\"authors\":\"S. Yun, Bareum Gwon, H. L. Hong, Hwan Seop Lim, K. Lee, I. Jang, Eun-Jeong Yoon, S. Jeong\",\"doi\":\"10.5145/acm.2019.22.4.96\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an issue not only with regard to public health, but also in terms of economic impact. AMR surveillance has mainly been carried out in general hospitals, and not in nursing hospitals. This study was conducted to investigate the AMR rate for bacterial strains isolated from nursing hospital samples. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results from a total of 23,518 bacterial isolates recovered from clinical specimens taken in 61 nursing hosals were analyzed. AST was conducted using Vitek 2 with AST cards specific for the bacterial strains. Results: A total of 19,357 Gram-negative and 4,161 Gram-positive bacterial strains were isolated. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=6,384) and Escherichia coli (n= 5,468) were the most prevalent bacterial species and, among Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus (n=1,565) was common. The AMR rate was high for the following strains: cefotaxime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, 77.4%; cefotaxime-resistant E. coli, 70.6%; imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, 90.3%; imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 49.3%; oxacillin-resistant S. aureus, 81.1%, penicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, 44.8%, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, 53.5%. AMR rate change varied by bacterial species and antimicrobial drug. Conclusion: AMR rates of major pathogens from nursing hospitals were higher than those from general hospitals with the exception of imipenem-resistant A. baumannii. Continuous monitoring and infection control strategies are needed. (Ann Clin Microbiol 2019;22:96-104)\",\"PeriodicalId\":34065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5145/acm.2019.22.4.96\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5145/acm.2019.22.4.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)不仅是一个公共卫生问题,而且在经济影响方面也是一个问题。抗菌素耐药性监测主要在综合医院开展,而在护理医院开展较少。本研究旨在调查从护理医院样本中分离的菌株的AMR率。方法:对61所护理医院临床标本中分离的23518株细菌进行药敏试验(AST)分析。采用Vitek 2进行AST检测,并附有菌株特异性AST卡。结果:共分离到革兰氏阴性菌19357株,革兰氏阳性菌4161株。铜绿假单胞菌(6384株)和大肠杆菌(5468株)是最常见的菌种,革兰氏阳性菌中以金黄色葡萄球菌(1565株)最为常见。耐头孢噻肟肺炎克雷伯菌的AMR率较高,为77.4%;耐头孢噻肟大肠杆菌占70.6%;耐亚胺培南鲍曼不动杆菌,90.3%;耐亚胺培南铜绿假单胞菌,49.3%;耐氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌占81.1%,耐青霉素粪肠球菌占44.8%,耐万古霉素粪肠球菌占53.5%。抗菌素耐药性随细菌种类和抗菌药物的不同而变化。结论:除耐亚胺培南鲍曼不动杆菌外,护理医院主要病原菌AMR率均高于综合医院。需要持续监测和感染控制战略。(安克林微生物杂志2019;22:96-104)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Isolates Recovered from Nursing Hospitals between 2014 and 2017
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an issue not only with regard to public health, but also in terms of economic impact. AMR surveillance has mainly been carried out in general hospitals, and not in nursing hospitals. This study was conducted to investigate the AMR rate for bacterial strains isolated from nursing hospital samples. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results from a total of 23,518 bacterial isolates recovered from clinical specimens taken in 61 nursing hosals were analyzed. AST was conducted using Vitek 2 with AST cards specific for the bacterial strains. Results: A total of 19,357 Gram-negative and 4,161 Gram-positive bacterial strains were isolated. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=6,384) and Escherichia coli (n= 5,468) were the most prevalent bacterial species and, among Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus (n=1,565) was common. The AMR rate was high for the following strains: cefotaxime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, 77.4%; cefotaxime-resistant E. coli, 70.6%; imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, 90.3%; imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, 49.3%; oxacillin-resistant S. aureus, 81.1%, penicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, 44.8%, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, 53.5%. AMR rate change varied by bacterial species and antimicrobial drug. Conclusion: AMR rates of major pathogens from nursing hospitals were higher than those from general hospitals with the exception of imipenem-resistant A. baumannii. Continuous monitoring and infection control strategies are needed. (Ann Clin Microbiol 2019;22:96-104)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信