几何和环境对聚氨酯泡沫板防火性能的影响

IF 2 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Konrad Wilkens Flecknoe-Brown, Patrick van Hees
{"title":"几何和环境对聚氨酯泡沫板防火性能的影响","authors":"Konrad Wilkens Flecknoe-Brown,&nbsp;Patrick van Hees","doi":"10.1002/fam.3133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents the results of a set of large-scale fire tests performed on horizontal polyurethane foam slabs. Slab thickness, ignition location, and environment (free burn or corner wall) were varied over 23 individual tests. In a continuation of a previous study by the authors, four different slab thicknesses, five different ignition locations, and three environmental modification combinations were tested to examine the potential effects these parameters may have on the test outcomes. Wall configurations were composed of either gypsum plaster board or particle board wall linings and enclosed two sides of the foam slabs. The results obtained were heat release rate, peak HRR, total heat release, and effective heat of combustion, smoke production rate, total smoke production, specific extinction area and soot yield along with flame spread rate calculations obtained using a specifically designed sample tray. These were then analysed to quantify the effects of the test input parameter changes. Results highlight the influence of test input parameter changes on almost all the chosen fire metrics analysed. Slab thickness showed relatively straight forward linear changes to global metrics such as total heat release and total smoke production, while effective heat of combustion showed no change. The smoke production parameters of specific extinction area and soot yield showed minor trends towards higher values with increased slab thickness. Flame spread rates also showed an increased velocity with thicker slabs. Changes to the environment surrounding the foam slabs, from a free-burning scenario to a corner wall configuration that obstructed two sides of the foam slab generally resulted in faster growth of HRR and higher peak values when compared to the free-burn tests. This outcome was most obvious for the wall tests using combustible materials, where growth rates were comparative to an ultra-fast t^2 fire, and peak HRR value rose to over triple that of the free-burn test results. Flame spread rates were highly impacted by the addition of a corner wall, spread rates increased, and the overall pattern of spread rates across the face of the slabs changed entirely. The influence on smoke production values was minor, and for other smoke metrics, the scenario changes showed little influence. However, the values obtained for soot yields were approximately an order of magnitude lower than those given in standard reference books, such as the SFPE handbook for flexible polyurethane foam. This was an interesting additional finding as soot yield values are often directly used in CFD models to simulate smoke spread and determine life safety criteria in fire safety engineering (FSE).</p>","PeriodicalId":12186,"journal":{"name":"Fire and Materials","volume":"47 7","pages":"892-909"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fam.3133","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometrical and environmental effect on fire behaviour of polyurethane foam slabs\",\"authors\":\"Konrad Wilkens Flecknoe-Brown,&nbsp;Patrick van Hees\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fam.3133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study presents the results of a set of large-scale fire tests performed on horizontal polyurethane foam slabs. Slab thickness, ignition location, and environment (free burn or corner wall) were varied over 23 individual tests. In a continuation of a previous study by the authors, four different slab thicknesses, five different ignition locations, and three environmental modification combinations were tested to examine the potential effects these parameters may have on the test outcomes. Wall configurations were composed of either gypsum plaster board or particle board wall linings and enclosed two sides of the foam slabs. The results obtained were heat release rate, peak HRR, total heat release, and effective heat of combustion, smoke production rate, total smoke production, specific extinction area and soot yield along with flame spread rate calculations obtained using a specifically designed sample tray. These were then analysed to quantify the effects of the test input parameter changes. Results highlight the influence of test input parameter changes on almost all the chosen fire metrics analysed. Slab thickness showed relatively straight forward linear changes to global metrics such as total heat release and total smoke production, while effective heat of combustion showed no change. The smoke production parameters of specific extinction area and soot yield showed minor trends towards higher values with increased slab thickness. Flame spread rates also showed an increased velocity with thicker slabs. Changes to the environment surrounding the foam slabs, from a free-burning scenario to a corner wall configuration that obstructed two sides of the foam slab generally resulted in faster growth of HRR and higher peak values when compared to the free-burn tests. This outcome was most obvious for the wall tests using combustible materials, where growth rates were comparative to an ultra-fast t^2 fire, and peak HRR value rose to over triple that of the free-burn test results. Flame spread rates were highly impacted by the addition of a corner wall, spread rates increased, and the overall pattern of spread rates across the face of the slabs changed entirely. The influence on smoke production values was minor, and for other smoke metrics, the scenario changes showed little influence. However, the values obtained for soot yields were approximately an order of magnitude lower than those given in standard reference books, such as the SFPE handbook for flexible polyurethane foam. This was an interesting additional finding as soot yield values are often directly used in CFD models to simulate smoke spread and determine life safety criteria in fire safety engineering (FSE).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire and Materials\",\"volume\":\"47 7\",\"pages\":\"892-909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fam.3133\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire and Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fam.3133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fam.3133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究介绍了一组在水平聚氨酯泡沫板上进行的大规模火灾试验的结果。在23个单独的试验中,板坯厚度、点火位置和环境(自由燃烧或角壁)各不相同。在作者先前研究的延续中,测试了四种不同的板厚度、五种不同的点火位置和三种环境改性组合,以检查这些参数可能对测试结果的潜在影响。墙体结构由石膏板或刨花板墙衬组成,并将泡沫板的两侧围起来。得到热释放率、峰值HRR、总热释放量、有效燃烧热、产烟率、总产烟量、比消光面积、产烟量以及火焰蔓延率的计算结果。然后对这些进行分析,以量化测试输入参数变化的影响。结果突出了测试输入参数变化对所分析的几乎所有选定的火灾指标的影响。板坯厚度对总放热量和总产烟量等整体指标呈现相对直接的线性变化,而有效燃烧热没有变化。随着板坯厚度的增加,比消光面积和产烟量的产烟参数有小幅升高的趋势。随着楼板厚度的增加,火焰的传播速度也有所增加。与自由燃烧测试相比,泡沫板周围环境的变化,从自由燃烧场景到阻挡泡沫板两侧的角墙配置,通常会导致HRR的更快增长和更高的峰值。这一结果在使用可燃材料的墙体试验中最为明显,其增长率与超高速t^2火灾相比,峰值HRR值上升到自由燃烧试验结果的三倍以上。角墙的增加对火焰的传播速度产生了很大的影响,传播速度增加了,整个平板表面的传播速度格局完全改变了。对烟雾产生值的影响较小,对其他烟雾指标,情景变化的影响不大。然而,获得的烟尘产量值大约比标准参考书中给出的值低一个数量级,例如柔性聚氨酯泡沫的SFPE手册。这是一个有趣的附加发现,因为烟尘屈服值通常直接用于CFD模型来模拟烟雾扩散,并确定消防安全工程(FSE)中的生命安全标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Geometrical and environmental effect on fire behaviour of polyurethane foam slabs

Geometrical and environmental effect on fire behaviour of polyurethane foam slabs

This study presents the results of a set of large-scale fire tests performed on horizontal polyurethane foam slabs. Slab thickness, ignition location, and environment (free burn or corner wall) were varied over 23 individual tests. In a continuation of a previous study by the authors, four different slab thicknesses, five different ignition locations, and three environmental modification combinations were tested to examine the potential effects these parameters may have on the test outcomes. Wall configurations were composed of either gypsum plaster board or particle board wall linings and enclosed two sides of the foam slabs. The results obtained were heat release rate, peak HRR, total heat release, and effective heat of combustion, smoke production rate, total smoke production, specific extinction area and soot yield along with flame spread rate calculations obtained using a specifically designed sample tray. These were then analysed to quantify the effects of the test input parameter changes. Results highlight the influence of test input parameter changes on almost all the chosen fire metrics analysed. Slab thickness showed relatively straight forward linear changes to global metrics such as total heat release and total smoke production, while effective heat of combustion showed no change. The smoke production parameters of specific extinction area and soot yield showed minor trends towards higher values with increased slab thickness. Flame spread rates also showed an increased velocity with thicker slabs. Changes to the environment surrounding the foam slabs, from a free-burning scenario to a corner wall configuration that obstructed two sides of the foam slab generally resulted in faster growth of HRR and higher peak values when compared to the free-burn tests. This outcome was most obvious for the wall tests using combustible materials, where growth rates were comparative to an ultra-fast t^2 fire, and peak HRR value rose to over triple that of the free-burn test results. Flame spread rates were highly impacted by the addition of a corner wall, spread rates increased, and the overall pattern of spread rates across the face of the slabs changed entirely. The influence on smoke production values was minor, and for other smoke metrics, the scenario changes showed little influence. However, the values obtained for soot yields were approximately an order of magnitude lower than those given in standard reference books, such as the SFPE handbook for flexible polyurethane foam. This was an interesting additional finding as soot yield values are often directly used in CFD models to simulate smoke spread and determine life safety criteria in fire safety engineering (FSE).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire and Materials
Fire and Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Fire and Materials is an international journal for scientific and technological communications directed at the fire properties of materials and the products into which they are made. This covers all aspects of the polymer field and the end uses where polymers find application; the important developments in the fields of natural products - wood and cellulosics; non-polymeric materials - metals and ceramics; as well as the chemistry and industrial applications of fire retardant chemicals. Contributions will be particularly welcomed on heat release; properties of combustion products - smoke opacity, toxicity and corrosivity; modelling and testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信