{"title":"炔诺孕酮和左炔诺孕酮释放宫内系统治疗乙型脑出血的临床疗效","authors":"Yang Xu, Li Li, Guixia Yang","doi":"10.26689/jcnr.v6i5.4213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis. Methods: A total of 60 cases of adenomyosis admitted to Dezhou Women and Children’s Hospital from January 2020 to October 2021 were selected and randomly divided into two groups (Group A and Group B), which were initiated on dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, respectively. The therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were analyzed. Results: After 6 months of treatment, the uterine volume in the LNG-IUS group reduced slightly compared with that before treatment, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05), while that in the DNG group increased slightly compared with that before treatment, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the hemoglobin of patients in both groups increased compared with that before treatment; there was no significant difference in the DNG group (p > 0.05), but there was significant difference in the LNG-IUS group (p < 0.01). After 6 months of treatment, the VAS scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (p < 0.01); the serum CA125 level in both groups decreased significantly compared with that before treatment (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) has better therapeutic effect on adenomyosis and fewer adverse reactions than deinogest.","PeriodicalId":64151,"journal":{"name":"临床护理研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy of Dienogest and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in the Treatment of Adenomyosis\",\"authors\":\"Yang Xu, Li Li, Guixia Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.26689/jcnr.v6i5.4213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis. Methods: A total of 60 cases of adenomyosis admitted to Dezhou Women and Children’s Hospital from January 2020 to October 2021 were selected and randomly divided into two groups (Group A and Group B), which were initiated on dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, respectively. The therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were analyzed. Results: After 6 months of treatment, the uterine volume in the LNG-IUS group reduced slightly compared with that before treatment, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05), while that in the DNG group increased slightly compared with that before treatment, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the hemoglobin of patients in both groups increased compared with that before treatment; there was no significant difference in the DNG group (p > 0.05), but there was significant difference in the LNG-IUS group (p < 0.01). After 6 months of treatment, the VAS scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (p < 0.01); the serum CA125 level in both groups decreased significantly compared with that before treatment (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) has better therapeutic effect on adenomyosis and fewer adverse reactions than deinogest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":64151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"临床护理研究\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"临床护理研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26689/jcnr.v6i5.4213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床护理研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/jcnr.v6i5.4213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Efficacy of Dienogest and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in the Treatment of Adenomyosis
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis. Methods: A total of 60 cases of adenomyosis admitted to Dezhou Women and Children’s Hospital from January 2020 to October 2021 were selected and randomly divided into two groups (Group A and Group B), which were initiated on dienogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, respectively. The therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were analyzed. Results: After 6 months of treatment, the uterine volume in the LNG-IUS group reduced slightly compared with that before treatment, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05), while that in the DNG group increased slightly compared with that before treatment, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the hemoglobin of patients in both groups increased compared with that before treatment; there was no significant difference in the DNG group (p > 0.05), but there was significant difference in the LNG-IUS group (p < 0.01). After 6 months of treatment, the VAS scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (p < 0.01); the serum CA125 level in both groups decreased significantly compared with that before treatment (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) has better therapeutic effect on adenomyosis and fewer adverse reactions than deinogest.