与EGFR/BRAF/KRAS野生型癌症细胞系相比,KRAS突变型肺癌癌症细胞系中的核结合蛋白-2mRNA水平下调

S. Noriaki, Imai Hisao, Okada Junichi, Yamada Eijiro, Okada Shuichi, Yamada Masanobu
{"title":"与EGFR/BRAF/KRAS野生型癌症细胞系相比,KRAS突变型肺癌癌症细胞系中的核结合蛋白-2mRNA水平下调","authors":"S. Noriaki, Imai Hisao, Okada Junichi, Yamada Eijiro, Okada Shuichi, Yamada Masanobu","doi":"10.36959/571/722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ten of lung cancer cell lines with EGFR/BRAF/KRAS wildtype (H1299, H1819, HCC95, H838, H1437, H661, HCC15, HCC78, H1648, HCC193) and eleven of lung cancer cell lines with KRAS-mutation [KRAS-G12C (H2122, HCC44, H1792, HCC4017, H358), KRAS-G12V (H441), KRAS-G12D (HCC515), KRAS-G12R (H1264, H157), KRAS-G12A (H2009), KRAS-Q61H (H460)] were used [3]. Nucleobindin-2 mRNA level was analyzed by RT-qPCR as previously rescribed [3]. Primers and probes for Nucleobindin-2 and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were obtained from Ori Gene Technologies (MK203097; Rockville, MD, USA;) and Applied Biosystems (Assay ID: Hs99999905_m1; Tokyo, Japan;), respectively. To normalize the amount of input cDNA, quantitative analysis was performed using the GAPDH as an internal reference. Relative expression values were computed using the comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method. All data in the figure are presented as mean ± standard deviation and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA to compare the means of all the groups. Turkey-Kramer multiple comparisons method was used to determine statistical differences between the means, with p < 0.05 deemed statistically significant using the InStat 2.00 program.","PeriodicalId":92751,"journal":{"name":"Annals of lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nucleobindin-2 mRNA level is down regulated in KRAS-mutation lung cancer cell lines compared with EGFR/BRAF/KRAS wild-type lung cancer cell lines\",\"authors\":\"S. Noriaki, Imai Hisao, Okada Junichi, Yamada Eijiro, Okada Shuichi, Yamada Masanobu\",\"doi\":\"10.36959/571/722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ten of lung cancer cell lines with EGFR/BRAF/KRAS wildtype (H1299, H1819, HCC95, H838, H1437, H661, HCC15, HCC78, H1648, HCC193) and eleven of lung cancer cell lines with KRAS-mutation [KRAS-G12C (H2122, HCC44, H1792, HCC4017, H358), KRAS-G12V (H441), KRAS-G12D (HCC515), KRAS-G12R (H1264, H157), KRAS-G12A (H2009), KRAS-Q61H (H460)] were used [3]. Nucleobindin-2 mRNA level was analyzed by RT-qPCR as previously rescribed [3]. Primers and probes for Nucleobindin-2 and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were obtained from Ori Gene Technologies (MK203097; Rockville, MD, USA;) and Applied Biosystems (Assay ID: Hs99999905_m1; Tokyo, Japan;), respectively. To normalize the amount of input cDNA, quantitative analysis was performed using the GAPDH as an internal reference. Relative expression values were computed using the comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method. All data in the figure are presented as mean ± standard deviation and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA to compare the means of all the groups. Turkey-Kramer multiple comparisons method was used to determine statistical differences between the means, with p < 0.05 deemed statistically significant using the InStat 2.00 program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of lung cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of lung cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36959/571/722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/571/722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选取10株EGFR/BRAF/KRAS野生型肺癌细胞株(H1299、H1819、HCC95、H838、H1437、H661、HCC15、HCC78、H1648、HCC193)和11株KRAS- g12c (H2122、HCC44、H1792、HCC4017、H358)、KRAS- g12v (H441)、KRAS- g12d (HCC515)、KRAS- g12r (H1264、H157)、KRAS- g12a (H2009)、KRAS- q61h (H460))。RT-qPCR分析核结合蛋白-2 mRNA水平,如前所述[3]。核酸结合蛋白-2和甘油醛3-磷酸脱氢酶(GAPDH)的引物和探针来自Ori Gene Technologies (MK203097;Rockville, MD, USA;)和Applied Biosystems(测定号:Hs99999905_m1;东京,日本;)。为了使输入cDNA的数量归一化,以GAPDH作为内参进行定量分析。采用比较周期阈值(Ct)法计算相对表达值。图中所有数据均以均数±标准差表示,采用单因素方差分析比较各组的均数。采用Turkey-Kramer多重比较法确定均数间的统计学差异,以p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义,采用InStat 2.00程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nucleobindin-2 mRNA level is down regulated in KRAS-mutation lung cancer cell lines compared with EGFR/BRAF/KRAS wild-type lung cancer cell lines
Ten of lung cancer cell lines with EGFR/BRAF/KRAS wildtype (H1299, H1819, HCC95, H838, H1437, H661, HCC15, HCC78, H1648, HCC193) and eleven of lung cancer cell lines with KRAS-mutation [KRAS-G12C (H2122, HCC44, H1792, HCC4017, H358), KRAS-G12V (H441), KRAS-G12D (HCC515), KRAS-G12R (H1264, H157), KRAS-G12A (H2009), KRAS-Q61H (H460)] were used [3]. Nucleobindin-2 mRNA level was analyzed by RT-qPCR as previously rescribed [3]. Primers and probes for Nucleobindin-2 and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were obtained from Ori Gene Technologies (MK203097; Rockville, MD, USA;) and Applied Biosystems (Assay ID: Hs99999905_m1; Tokyo, Japan;), respectively. To normalize the amount of input cDNA, quantitative analysis was performed using the GAPDH as an internal reference. Relative expression values were computed using the comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method. All data in the figure are presented as mean ± standard deviation and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA to compare the means of all the groups. Turkey-Kramer multiple comparisons method was used to determine statistical differences between the means, with p < 0.05 deemed statistically significant using the InStat 2.00 program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信