以群体为基础的策略能提高社区恢复力吗?持续参与Covid - 19互助和社区支持小组的纵向预测因素

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Rotem Perach, Maria Fernandes‐Jesus, Daniel Miranda, Guanlan Mao, Evangelos Ntontis, C. Cocking, Michael McTague, J. Semlyen, J. Drury
{"title":"以群体为基础的策略能提高社区恢复力吗?持续参与Covid - 19互助和社区支持小组的纵向预测因素","authors":"Rotem Perach, Maria Fernandes‐Jesus, Daniel Miranda, Guanlan Mao, Evangelos Ntontis, C. Cocking, Michael McTague, J. Semlyen, J. Drury","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/m4wpu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mutual aid groups have been a critical part of the Covid-19 response and continue to address the needs of people in their communities. To understand how mutual aid and similar community support groups can be sustained over time, we test the idea that using group-based strategies, such as interacting with other organizations, initiates psychological trajectories that shape future participation. We conducted a pre-registered longitudinal survey among Covid-19 mutual aid and community support volunteers in the UK (nWave 1 = 600, May 2021;nWave2 = 299, July-August, 2021). Assessments included measures of group-based strategies, collective participation predictors (e.g., sense of community responsibility), participation experience (e.g., positive affect), and sustained participation. Volunteers engaged in a wide range of support activities including shopping, emotional support provision, and deliveries. Two group-based strategies – group alliances and group horizontality – longitudinally predicted sustained participation. In addition, sense of community responsibility and burnout were longitudinal predictors of sustained participation. Importantly, predictors of sustained participation diverged for volunteers with different levels of volunteering experience. Our findings highlight group-based strategies as a potential resource for organizers. Use can be tailored depending on the profiles of individual Covid-19 mutual aid volunteers. These findings have significance beyond Covid-19 as they are relevant to sustaining community resilience more generally.","PeriodicalId":48404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can group‐based strategies increase community resilience? Longitudinal predictors of sustained participation in Covid‐19 mutual aid and community support groups\",\"authors\":\"Rotem Perach, Maria Fernandes‐Jesus, Daniel Miranda, Guanlan Mao, Evangelos Ntontis, C. Cocking, Michael McTague, J. Semlyen, J. Drury\",\"doi\":\"10.31234/osf.io/m4wpu\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mutual aid groups have been a critical part of the Covid-19 response and continue to address the needs of people in their communities. To understand how mutual aid and similar community support groups can be sustained over time, we test the idea that using group-based strategies, such as interacting with other organizations, initiates psychological trajectories that shape future participation. We conducted a pre-registered longitudinal survey among Covid-19 mutual aid and community support volunteers in the UK (nWave 1 = 600, May 2021;nWave2 = 299, July-August, 2021). Assessments included measures of group-based strategies, collective participation predictors (e.g., sense of community responsibility), participation experience (e.g., positive affect), and sustained participation. Volunteers engaged in a wide range of support activities including shopping, emotional support provision, and deliveries. Two group-based strategies – group alliances and group horizontality – longitudinally predicted sustained participation. In addition, sense of community responsibility and burnout were longitudinal predictors of sustained participation. Importantly, predictors of sustained participation diverged for volunteers with different levels of volunteering experience. Our findings highlight group-based strategies as a potential resource for organizers. Use can be tailored depending on the profiles of individual Covid-19 mutual aid volunteers. These findings have significance beyond Covid-19 as they are relevant to sustaining community resilience more generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Social Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m4wpu\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m4wpu","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

互助组织一直是应对Covid-19的关键组成部分,并继续解决社区中人们的需求。为了理解互助和类似的社区支持团体是如何随着时间的推移而持续下去的,我们测试了这样一种观点,即使用基于群体的策略,例如与其他组织互动,可以启动塑造未来参与的心理轨迹。我们在英国的Covid-19互助和社区支持志愿者中进行了一项预先注册的纵向调查(nwave1 = 600, 2021年5月;nWave2 = 299, 2021年7月至8月)。评估包括基于群体的策略、集体参与预测因素(例如,社区责任感)、参与经验(例如,积极影响)和持续参与的措施。志愿者参与了广泛的支持活动,包括购物、情感支持和送货。两种基于群体的策略——群体联盟和群体水平——在纵向上预测了持续的参与。此外,社区责任感和倦怠感是持续参与的纵向预测因子。重要的是,不同志愿服务经验水平的志愿者持续参与的预测因素存在差异。我们的研究结果强调了以群体为基础的策略是组织者的潜在资源。可以根据Covid-19互助志愿者的个人情况量身定制使用。这些发现的意义超出了Covid-19,因为它们与更普遍地维持社区抵御力有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can group‐based strategies increase community resilience? Longitudinal predictors of sustained participation in Covid‐19 mutual aid and community support groups
Mutual aid groups have been a critical part of the Covid-19 response and continue to address the needs of people in their communities. To understand how mutual aid and similar community support groups can be sustained over time, we test the idea that using group-based strategies, such as interacting with other organizations, initiates psychological trajectories that shape future participation. We conducted a pre-registered longitudinal survey among Covid-19 mutual aid and community support volunteers in the UK (nWave 1 = 600, May 2021;nWave2 = 299, July-August, 2021). Assessments included measures of group-based strategies, collective participation predictors (e.g., sense of community responsibility), participation experience (e.g., positive affect), and sustained participation. Volunteers engaged in a wide range of support activities including shopping, emotional support provision, and deliveries. Two group-based strategies – group alliances and group horizontality – longitudinally predicted sustained participation. In addition, sense of community responsibility and burnout were longitudinal predictors of sustained participation. Importantly, predictors of sustained participation diverged for volunteers with different levels of volunteering experience. Our findings highlight group-based strategies as a potential resource for organizers. Use can be tailored depending on the profiles of individual Covid-19 mutual aid volunteers. These findings have significance beyond Covid-19 as they are relevant to sustaining community resilience more generally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, Journal of Applied Social Psychology is a monthly publication devoted to applications of experimental behavioral science research to problems of society (e.g., organizational and leadership psychology, safety, health, and gender issues; perceptions of war and natural hazards; jury deliberation; performance, AIDS, cancer, heart disease, exercise, and sports).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信