强制性企业社会责任披露如何及何时影响企业社会责任披露策略?

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Zhe Zhang, J. Chen, Ming Jia
{"title":"强制性企业社会责任披露如何及何时影响企业社会责任披露策略?","authors":"Zhe Zhang, J. Chen, Ming Jia","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure recognizes the importance of the government and examines how firms respond to government CSR regulations. However, little attention is given to how government regulations affect firms’ disclosure strategy in multiple fields of CSR. Based on institutional theory, this study proposes that mandatory CSR disclosure increases the legitimacy management cost for firms, and thus firms disclose more CSR scope to gain legitimacy and less CSR emphasis to reduce costs. Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms in 2008–2018, this study finds that mandatory CSR disclosure is positively related to CSR scope but negatively related to CSR emphasis. In addition, firm visibility strengthens the aforementioned positive and negative relations, whereas market competition weakens the relation between mandatory CSR disclosure and CSR emphasis. This study contributes to the literature on CSR disclosure and studies on organizational responses to the government mandate. 虽然关于企业社会责任信息披露的研究认识到政府的重要性,并考察了企业如何响应政府的社会责任规定,但是,鲜有研究考察政府的规定如何影响企业在多个社会责任领域的披露策略。本文作者基于制度理论,提出强制性企业社会责任披露增加了企业的合法性管理成本,因而企业会披露较多的社会责任范围来获得合法性,而披露较少的企业社会责任的着重点以降低成本。本研究利用2008-2018年中国A股上市公司的数据进行分析,发现强制性企业社会责任披露确实与企业社会责任披露的范围呈正相关,而与企业社会责任披露的着重点呈负相关。此外,企业知名度加强了上述的正、负关系;而市场竞争削弱了强制性企业社会责任披露与企业社会责任披露着重点之间的负关系。本研究对企业社会责任披露文献和组织响应政府规定的文献做出了贡献。","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How and When Does Mandatory CSR Disclosure Affects Firms’ CSR Disclosure Strategy?\",\"authors\":\"Zhe Zhang, J. Chen, Ming Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/mor.2022.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure recognizes the importance of the government and examines how firms respond to government CSR regulations. However, little attention is given to how government regulations affect firms’ disclosure strategy in multiple fields of CSR. Based on institutional theory, this study proposes that mandatory CSR disclosure increases the legitimacy management cost for firms, and thus firms disclose more CSR scope to gain legitimacy and less CSR emphasis to reduce costs. Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms in 2008–2018, this study finds that mandatory CSR disclosure is positively related to CSR scope but negatively related to CSR emphasis. In addition, firm visibility strengthens the aforementioned positive and negative relations, whereas market competition weakens the relation between mandatory CSR disclosure and CSR emphasis. This study contributes to the literature on CSR disclosure and studies on organizational responses to the government mandate. 虽然关于企业社会责任信息披露的研究认识到政府的重要性,并考察了企业如何响应政府的社会责任规定,但是,鲜有研究考察政府的规定如何影响企业在多个社会责任领域的披露策略。本文作者基于制度理论,提出强制性企业社会责任披露增加了企业的合法性管理成本,因而企业会披露较多的社会责任范围来获得合法性,而披露较少的企业社会责任的着重点以降低成本。本研究利用2008-2018年中国A股上市公司的数据进行分析,发现强制性企业社会责任披露确实与企业社会责任披露的范围呈正相关,而与企业社会责任披露的着重点呈负相关。此外,企业知名度加强了上述的正、负关系;而市场竞争削弱了强制性企业社会责任披露与企业社会责任披露着重点之间的负关系。本研究对企业社会责任披露文献和组织响应政府规定的文献做出了贡献。\",\"PeriodicalId\":47798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management and Organization Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management and Organization Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.43\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.43","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

ABSTRACT Research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure recognizes the importance of the government and examples how firm responses to government CSR regulations How, little attention is given to how government regulations affect firm 'disclosure strategy in multiple fields of CSR Based on institutional theory, this study proposes that mandatory CSR disclosure increases the legal management cost for firms, and that firms disclosure more CSR scope to gain legal and less CSR emphasis to reduce costs Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms in 2008-2018, this study finds that mandatory CSR disclosure is positively related to CSR scope but negatively related to CSR emphasis In addition, firm visibility strengths the anticipated positive and negative relationships, where as market competition weakens the relationship between mandatory CSR disclosure and CSR emphasis This study contributes to the quality on CSR disclosure and studies on organizational responses to the government mandate Although research on corporate social responsibility information disclosure recognizes the importance of government and examines how companies respond to government social responsibility regulations, there is little research examining how government regulations affect companies' disclosure strategies in multiple areas of social responsibility. Based on institutional theory, the author of this article proposes that mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure increases the cost of legitimacy management for enterprises. Therefore, enterprises will disclose more scope of social responsibility to obtain legitimacy, while those with less disclosure focus on reducing costs. This study analyzed data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2018 and found that mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure is indeed positively correlated with the scope of corporate social responsibility disclosure, but negatively correlated with the focus of corporate social responsibility disclosure. In addition, the company's visibility has strengthened the positive and negative relationships mentioned above; And market competition weakens the negative relationship between mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure and the focus of corporate social responsibility disclosure. This study has contributed to the literature on corporate social responsibility disclosure and organizational response to government regulations.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How and When Does Mandatory CSR Disclosure Affects Firms’ CSR Disclosure Strategy?
ABSTRACT Research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure recognizes the importance of the government and examines how firms respond to government CSR regulations. However, little attention is given to how government regulations affect firms’ disclosure strategy in multiple fields of CSR. Based on institutional theory, this study proposes that mandatory CSR disclosure increases the legitimacy management cost for firms, and thus firms disclose more CSR scope to gain legitimacy and less CSR emphasis to reduce costs. Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms in 2008–2018, this study finds that mandatory CSR disclosure is positively related to CSR scope but negatively related to CSR emphasis. In addition, firm visibility strengthens the aforementioned positive and negative relations, whereas market competition weakens the relation between mandatory CSR disclosure and CSR emphasis. This study contributes to the literature on CSR disclosure and studies on organizational responses to the government mandate. 虽然关于企业社会责任信息披露的研究认识到政府的重要性,并考察了企业如何响应政府的社会责任规定,但是,鲜有研究考察政府的规定如何影响企业在多个社会责任领域的披露策略。本文作者基于制度理论,提出强制性企业社会责任披露增加了企业的合法性管理成本,因而企业会披露较多的社会责任范围来获得合法性,而披露较少的企业社会责任的着重点以降低成本。本研究利用2008-2018年中国A股上市公司的数据进行分析,发现强制性企业社会责任披露确实与企业社会责任披露的范围呈正相关,而与企业社会责任披露的着重点呈负相关。此外,企业知名度加强了上述的正、负关系;而市场竞争削弱了强制性企业社会责任披露与企业社会责任披露着重点之间的负关系。本研究对企业社会责任披露文献和组织响应政府规定的文献做出了贡献。
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信