{"title":"需要改进的地方和内容?基于有效教学实践的MOOC评价框架设计与应用","authors":"Yang Wang","doi":"10.1080/01587919.2023.2226601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Given the varied quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs), it is necessary to construct a MOOC evaluation framework to guide teachers’ online teaching practices. Based on the Quality Matters online course evaluation framework and studies on effective online teaching practices, a MOOC evaluation framework was constructed through literature analysis and expert interviews. Finally, an evaluation framework with eight dimensions and 42 secondary indicators was constructed. To examine its validity, five MOOCs were evaluated with this framework. Results show that the evaluation framework is helpful for evaluating MOOCs and providing implications for online instructors. They revealed the common limitations of MOOCs: single method for knowledge introduction, traditional evaluation methods, insufficient attention to student initiative, and inadequate copyright concerns. Corresponding suggestions are provided to improve the quality of MOOCs. Theoretical and practical implications for the improvement of MOOCs are discussed along with avenues for further research.","PeriodicalId":51514,"journal":{"name":"Distance Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"458 - 475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where and what to improve? Design and application of a MOOC evaluation framework based on effective teaching practices\",\"authors\":\"Yang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01587919.2023.2226601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Given the varied quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs), it is necessary to construct a MOOC evaluation framework to guide teachers’ online teaching practices. Based on the Quality Matters online course evaluation framework and studies on effective online teaching practices, a MOOC evaluation framework was constructed through literature analysis and expert interviews. Finally, an evaluation framework with eight dimensions and 42 secondary indicators was constructed. To examine its validity, five MOOCs were evaluated with this framework. Results show that the evaluation framework is helpful for evaluating MOOCs and providing implications for online instructors. They revealed the common limitations of MOOCs: single method for knowledge introduction, traditional evaluation methods, insufficient attention to student initiative, and inadequate copyright concerns. Corresponding suggestions are provided to improve the quality of MOOCs. Theoretical and practical implications for the improvement of MOOCs are discussed along with avenues for further research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Distance Education\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"458 - 475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Distance Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2226601\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distance Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2226601","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Where and what to improve? Design and application of a MOOC evaluation framework based on effective teaching practices
Abstract Given the varied quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs), it is necessary to construct a MOOC evaluation framework to guide teachers’ online teaching practices. Based on the Quality Matters online course evaluation framework and studies on effective online teaching practices, a MOOC evaluation framework was constructed through literature analysis and expert interviews. Finally, an evaluation framework with eight dimensions and 42 secondary indicators was constructed. To examine its validity, five MOOCs were evaluated with this framework. Results show that the evaluation framework is helpful for evaluating MOOCs and providing implications for online instructors. They revealed the common limitations of MOOCs: single method for knowledge introduction, traditional evaluation methods, insufficient attention to student initiative, and inadequate copyright concerns. Corresponding suggestions are provided to improve the quality of MOOCs. Theoretical and practical implications for the improvement of MOOCs are discussed along with avenues for further research.
期刊介绍:
Distance Education, a peer-reviewed journal affiliated with the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia, Inc., is dedicated to publishing research and scholarly content in the realm of open, distance, and flexible education. Focusing on the freedom of learners from constraints in time, pace, and place of study, the journal has been a pioneering source in these educational domains. It continues to contribute original and scholarly work, playing a crucial role in advancing knowledge and practice in open and distance learning.