不同灌洗液对旋转系统不同锥度粪肠球菌计数的体外比较研究

Q3 Dentistry
Rahimath Shariq, Harish Shetty, P. Nair, V. D’Costa
{"title":"不同灌洗液对旋转系统不同锥度粪肠球菌计数的体外比较研究","authors":"Rahimath Shariq, Harish Shetty, P. Nair, V. D’Costa","doi":"10.4103/jofs.jofs_32_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The conservation of tooth structure and prevention of extrusion of obturating materials have been cited as primary advantages of minimal apical enlargements. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of different rotary file tapers and two irrigating solutions and a combination of two irrigating solutions on E. faecalis counts. In this study, 84 freshly extracted single rooted single canal human premolars were selected and enlarged to ISO #20 K-file. Materials and Methods: The samples were sterilized and inoculated with E. faecalis for 72 hours, divided into six experimental groups, and prepared with #30 nickel-titanium rotary files with 0.04 and 0.06 tapers. Group I was irrigated with 2 mL of 3% sodium hypochlorite, Group 2 was irrigated with 2 mL of 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), and Group 3 was irrigated with 2 mL of a combination of 3% sodium hypochlorite, saline, and 2% CHX irrigation after each file. Cleaning efficacy was evaluated in terms of the reduction of colony forming units. Comparison of the E. faecalis among the groups at 0.04 taper was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test after establishing normality of variance using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A comparison of the E. faecalis between 0.04 and 0.06 taper within the group was performed using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: Group 1 (3% sodium hypochlorite) and Group 3 (3% sodium hypochlorite + saline + 2% chlorhexidine gluconate) showed no statistically significant difference between the subgroups (0.04 and 0.06 taper), whereas statistically significant difference with E. faecalis was seen with respect to Group 2 between 0.04 and 0.06 taper (2% chlorhexidine gluconate). Conclusion: The study proved the use of sodium hypochlorite, saline, and CHX in combination at both 0.04 taper and 0.06 taper gave better results with no significant change.","PeriodicalId":16651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Enterococcus faecalis Counts on Different Tapers of Rotary System with Different Irrigating Solutions: An In Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Rahimath Shariq, Harish Shetty, P. Nair, V. D’Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jofs.jofs_32_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The conservation of tooth structure and prevention of extrusion of obturating materials have been cited as primary advantages of minimal apical enlargements. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of different rotary file tapers and two irrigating solutions and a combination of two irrigating solutions on E. faecalis counts. In this study, 84 freshly extracted single rooted single canal human premolars were selected and enlarged to ISO #20 K-file. Materials and Methods: The samples were sterilized and inoculated with E. faecalis for 72 hours, divided into six experimental groups, and prepared with #30 nickel-titanium rotary files with 0.04 and 0.06 tapers. Group I was irrigated with 2 mL of 3% sodium hypochlorite, Group 2 was irrigated with 2 mL of 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), and Group 3 was irrigated with 2 mL of a combination of 3% sodium hypochlorite, saline, and 2% CHX irrigation after each file. Cleaning efficacy was evaluated in terms of the reduction of colony forming units. Comparison of the E. faecalis among the groups at 0.04 taper was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test after establishing normality of variance using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A comparison of the E. faecalis between 0.04 and 0.06 taper within the group was performed using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: Group 1 (3% sodium hypochlorite) and Group 3 (3% sodium hypochlorite + saline + 2% chlorhexidine gluconate) showed no statistically significant difference between the subgroups (0.04 and 0.06 taper), whereas statistically significant difference with E. faecalis was seen with respect to Group 2 between 0.04 and 0.06 taper (2% chlorhexidine gluconate). Conclusion: The study proved the use of sodium hypochlorite, saline, and CHX in combination at both 0.04 taper and 0.06 taper gave better results with no significant change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orofacial Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orofacial Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_32_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_32_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:保护牙齿结构和防止堵塞材料挤出被认为是最小根尖扩大的主要优点。本研究的目的是比较不同旋转锉锥度和两种灌溉溶液以及两种灌溉液的组合对粪便大肠杆菌计数的影响。在本研究中,选择了84颗新鲜提取的单根单管人类前磨牙,并将其放大至ISO#20 K-file。材料和方法:将样品消毒并接种粪肠球菌72小时,分为6个实验组,用30号0.04和0.06锥度的镍钛旋转锉制备。第一组用2mL 3%次氯酸钠冲洗,第二组用2ml 2%氯己定(CHX)冲洗,第三组在每次锉刀后用2ml 3%次氯酸钠、盐水和2%CHX的组合冲洗。根据菌落形成单位的减少来评估清洁效果。在使用Shapiro-Wilk检验建立方差正态性后,使用Kruskal-Wallis检验对0.04锥度组之间的粪便大肠杆菌进行比较。使用Mann-Whitney检验对该组内0.04和0.06锥度之间的粪便大肠杆菌进行比较。结果:第1组(3%次氯酸钠)和第3组(3%次氯酸盐+生理盐水+2%葡萄糖酸氯己定)在亚组之间(0.04和0.06锥度)没有显示出统计学上的显著差异,而第2组与粪便大肠杆菌的统计学上的显着差异在0.04到0.06锥度之间(2%葡萄糖酸氯苯己定)。结论:研究证明,次氯酸钠、生理盐水和CHX在0.04锥度和0.06锥度下联合使用效果较好,没有显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of Enterococcus faecalis Counts on Different Tapers of Rotary System with Different Irrigating Solutions: An In Vitro Study
Introduction: The conservation of tooth structure and prevention of extrusion of obturating materials have been cited as primary advantages of minimal apical enlargements. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of different rotary file tapers and two irrigating solutions and a combination of two irrigating solutions on E. faecalis counts. In this study, 84 freshly extracted single rooted single canal human premolars were selected and enlarged to ISO #20 K-file. Materials and Methods: The samples were sterilized and inoculated with E. faecalis for 72 hours, divided into six experimental groups, and prepared with #30 nickel-titanium rotary files with 0.04 and 0.06 tapers. Group I was irrigated with 2 mL of 3% sodium hypochlorite, Group 2 was irrigated with 2 mL of 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), and Group 3 was irrigated with 2 mL of a combination of 3% sodium hypochlorite, saline, and 2% CHX irrigation after each file. Cleaning efficacy was evaluated in terms of the reduction of colony forming units. Comparison of the E. faecalis among the groups at 0.04 taper was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test after establishing normality of variance using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A comparison of the E. faecalis between 0.04 and 0.06 taper within the group was performed using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: Group 1 (3% sodium hypochlorite) and Group 3 (3% sodium hypochlorite + saline + 2% chlorhexidine gluconate) showed no statistically significant difference between the subgroups (0.04 and 0.06 taper), whereas statistically significant difference with E. faecalis was seen with respect to Group 2 between 0.04 and 0.06 taper (2% chlorhexidine gluconate). Conclusion: The study proved the use of sodium hypochlorite, saline, and CHX in combination at both 0.04 taper and 0.06 taper gave better results with no significant change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orofacial Sciences
Journal of Orofacial Sciences Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orofacial Sciences is dedicated to noblest profession of Dentistry, and to the young & blossoming intellects of dentistry, with whom the future of dentistry will be cherished better. The prime aim of this journal is to advance the science and art of dentistry. This journal is an educational tool to encourage and share the acquired knowledge with our peers. It also to improves the standards and quality of therauptic methods. This journal assures you to gain knowledge in recent advances and research activities. The journal publishes original scientific papers with special emphasis on research, unusual case reports, editorial, review articles, book reviews & other relevant information in context of high professional standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信