奥古斯都诗歌中对奥洛斯的拒绝的回响

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Kamila Wysłucha
{"title":"奥古斯都诗歌中对奥洛斯的拒绝的回响","authors":"Kamila Wysłucha","doi":"10.1163/22129758-12341336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAthenian elites of the late fifth century BC rebelled against aulos-playing as part of the school curriculum and launched a socio-cultural campaign against the instrument. Echoes of this ‘anti-aulos’ crusade reverberated in literature in the centuries to follow as motifs of hostility towards aulos music. Ovid (Fasti 6.657-710) and Propertius (2.30b) engage in this discourse, largely disregarding the motives of the Athenians for spurning the instrument; instead they embed the rejection myths in their poetical programmes in the context of their precarious relationship with Augustan authority. This paper argues that while both poets oppose the rejection of the doublepipes, they do so for entirely different reasons. Although the negative image of the aulos is present in Latin literary sources, it is largely disconnected from the substantial role of the instrument in Roman musical culture.","PeriodicalId":36585,"journal":{"name":"Greek and Roman Musical Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22129758-12341336","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Echoes of the Rejection of the Aulos in Augustan Poetry\",\"authors\":\"Kamila Wysłucha\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22129758-12341336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nAthenian elites of the late fifth century BC rebelled against aulos-playing as part of the school curriculum and launched a socio-cultural campaign against the instrument. Echoes of this ‘anti-aulos’ crusade reverberated in literature in the centuries to follow as motifs of hostility towards aulos music. Ovid (Fasti 6.657-710) and Propertius (2.30b) engage in this discourse, largely disregarding the motives of the Athenians for spurning the instrument; instead they embed the rejection myths in their poetical programmes in the context of their precarious relationship with Augustan authority. This paper argues that while both poets oppose the rejection of the doublepipes, they do so for entirely different reasons. Although the negative image of the aulos is present in Latin literary sources, it is largely disconnected from the substantial role of the instrument in Roman musical culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Greek and Roman Musical Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22129758-12341336\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Greek and Roman Musical Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22129758-12341336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greek and Roman Musical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22129758-12341336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

公元前5世纪晚期的雅典精英们反对将奥罗斯演奏作为学校课程的一部分,并发起了一场反对这种乐器的社会文化运动。这种“反奥洛斯”运动的回声在接下来的几个世纪里作为对奥洛斯音乐的敌意主题回荡在文学中。奥维德(法斯蒂书6.657-710)和普罗提乌斯(2.30b)参与了这一论述,在很大程度上无视雅典人抛弃乐器的动机;相反,他们在与奥古斯都权威的不稳定关系的背景下,将拒绝神话嵌入到他们的诗歌计划中。本文认为,虽然两位诗人都反对拒绝双管,但他们这样做的原因完全不同。虽然奥洛斯的负面形象出现在拉丁文学资料中,但它在很大程度上与罗马音乐文化中乐器的实质性作用脱节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Echoes of the Rejection of the Aulos in Augustan Poetry
Athenian elites of the late fifth century BC rebelled against aulos-playing as part of the school curriculum and launched a socio-cultural campaign against the instrument. Echoes of this ‘anti-aulos’ crusade reverberated in literature in the centuries to follow as motifs of hostility towards aulos music. Ovid (Fasti 6.657-710) and Propertius (2.30b) engage in this discourse, largely disregarding the motives of the Athenians for spurning the instrument; instead they embed the rejection myths in their poetical programmes in the context of their precarious relationship with Augustan authority. This paper argues that while both poets oppose the rejection of the doublepipes, they do so for entirely different reasons. Although the negative image of the aulos is present in Latin literary sources, it is largely disconnected from the substantial role of the instrument in Roman musical culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Greek and Roman Musical Studies
Greek and Roman Musical Studies Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信