基于细胞头阵列的BALB/c小鼠t细胞依赖性抗体应答(TDAR)方法

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Wenhua Zhong, Penghuan Chang, Lianfang Gan, Lifan Zhong, Zhaoxin Yang
{"title":"基于细胞头阵列的BALB/c小鼠t细胞依赖性抗体应答(TDAR)方法","authors":"Wenhua Zhong, Penghuan Chang, Lianfang Gan, Lifan Zhong, Zhaoxin Yang","doi":"10.1080/1547691X.2022.2067273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Most current methods to assess T-cell-dependent antibody responses (TDAR) are semi-quantitative and based on measures of antibody titer generated against a standard antigen like keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The precision, sensitivity, and convenience of TDAR assays might be improved by applying rapid, sensitive, specific cytometric bead assays (CBA). In the study here, KLH antigen was covalently coupled onto the surface of cytometric beads using immune microsphere technology, and IgM antibody capture spheres were prepared for use in pretreatment processing of samples. The working parameters associated with this novel TDAR-CBA system were optimized in orthogonal experiments. The optimal concentration of the KLH coating solution in this system was 160 μg/ml, that of the anti-KLH IgG capture spheres 6.0 × 105/ml, and the optimal dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Affini-Pure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) was 60 μg/ml. Repeated tests indicated that this approach yielded good linearity (r 2 = 0.9937) method, with a within-run precision of 3.1–4.9%, and a between-run precision of 4.4–4.9%. This new approach had a limit of detection of 113.43 ng/ml (linear range = 390.63–50 000), and an interference rate of just 0.04–3.51%. Based on these findings, it seems that a new mouse TDAR assay based on CBA can be developed that would appear to be more sensitive, accurate, and precise than the current TDAR assay approaches based on traditional ELISA.","PeriodicalId":16073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotoxicology","volume":"19 1","pages":"34 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) method in BALB/c mice based on a cytometric bead array\",\"authors\":\"Wenhua Zhong, Penghuan Chang, Lianfang Gan, Lifan Zhong, Zhaoxin Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1547691X.2022.2067273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Most current methods to assess T-cell-dependent antibody responses (TDAR) are semi-quantitative and based on measures of antibody titer generated against a standard antigen like keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The precision, sensitivity, and convenience of TDAR assays might be improved by applying rapid, sensitive, specific cytometric bead assays (CBA). In the study here, KLH antigen was covalently coupled onto the surface of cytometric beads using immune microsphere technology, and IgM antibody capture spheres were prepared for use in pretreatment processing of samples. The working parameters associated with this novel TDAR-CBA system were optimized in orthogonal experiments. The optimal concentration of the KLH coating solution in this system was 160 μg/ml, that of the anti-KLH IgG capture spheres 6.0 × 105/ml, and the optimal dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Affini-Pure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) was 60 μg/ml. Repeated tests indicated that this approach yielded good linearity (r 2 = 0.9937) method, with a within-run precision of 3.1–4.9%, and a between-run precision of 4.4–4.9%. This new approach had a limit of detection of 113.43 ng/ml (linear range = 390.63–50 000), and an interference rate of just 0.04–3.51%. Based on these findings, it seems that a new mouse TDAR assay based on CBA can be developed that would appear to be more sensitive, accurate, and precise than the current TDAR assay approaches based on traditional ELISA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immunotoxicology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"34 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immunotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2022.2067273\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2022.2067273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前大多数评估t细胞依赖性抗体反应(TDAR)的方法是半定量的,并且基于针对标准抗原(如锁孔帽贝血青素(KLH))产生的抗体滴度的测量。采用快速、灵敏、特异的细胞头测定法(CBA)可提高TDAR测定的精确性、灵敏度和便捷性。本研究采用免疫微球技术将KLH抗原共价偶联到细胞计数珠表面,制备IgM抗体捕获球用于样品的预处理处理。通过正交试验对该新型TDAR-CBA系统的工作参数进行了优化。该体系中KLH包被液的最佳浓度为160 μg/ml,抗KLH IgG捕获球的最佳浓度为6.0 × 105/ml,异硫氰酸荧光素(FITC)偶联亲和蛋白-纯山羊抗小鼠IgG (H + L)的最佳稀释度为60 μg/ml。反复试验表明,该方法线性良好(r 2 = 0.9937),运行内精密度为3.1-4.9%,运行间精密度为4.4-4.9%。该方法的检出限为113.43 ng/ml(线性范围为390.63 ~ 50 000),干扰率仅为0.04 ~ 3.51%。基于这些发现,似乎可以开发一种新的基于CBA的小鼠TDAR检测方法,该方法似乎比目前基于传统ELISA的TDAR检测方法更敏感、更准确、更精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) method in BALB/c mice based on a cytometric bead array
Abstract Most current methods to assess T-cell-dependent antibody responses (TDAR) are semi-quantitative and based on measures of antibody titer generated against a standard antigen like keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The precision, sensitivity, and convenience of TDAR assays might be improved by applying rapid, sensitive, specific cytometric bead assays (CBA). In the study here, KLH antigen was covalently coupled onto the surface of cytometric beads using immune microsphere technology, and IgM antibody capture spheres were prepared for use in pretreatment processing of samples. The working parameters associated with this novel TDAR-CBA system were optimized in orthogonal experiments. The optimal concentration of the KLH coating solution in this system was 160 μg/ml, that of the anti-KLH IgG capture spheres 6.0 × 105/ml, and the optimal dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Affini-Pure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) was 60 μg/ml. Repeated tests indicated that this approach yielded good linearity (r 2 = 0.9937) method, with a within-run precision of 3.1–4.9%, and a between-run precision of 4.4–4.9%. This new approach had a limit of detection of 113.43 ng/ml (linear range = 390.63–50 000), and an interference rate of just 0.04–3.51%. Based on these findings, it seems that a new mouse TDAR assay based on CBA can be developed that would appear to be more sensitive, accurate, and precise than the current TDAR assay approaches based on traditional ELISA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Immunotoxicology
Journal of Immunotoxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Immunotoxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides a needed singular forum for the international community of immunotoxicologists, immunologists, and toxicologists working in academia, government, consulting, and industry to both publish their original research and be made aware of the research findings of their colleagues in a timely manner. Research from many subdisciplines are presented in the journal, including the areas of molecular, developmental, pulmonary, regulatory, nutritional, mechanistic, wildlife, and environmental immunotoxicology, immunology, and toxicology. Original research articles as well as timely comprehensive reviews are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信