管理研究方法论学者的全球和国家知名度——波兰案例

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
O. Kosch, M. Szarucki, Ilona Skačkauskienė
{"title":"管理研究方法论学者的全球和国家知名度——波兰案例","authors":"O. Kosch, M. Szarucki, Ilona Skačkauskienė","doi":"10.3846/btp.2023.18655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing research methodology contributes to better management research outputs, links better management theory to business practice, as well as enriches the academic training received by the students at universities. Researchers might be tempted to provide generalizations on management research methodology based on global bibliographic databases, such as Scopus and Web of Science, and draw conclusions on the possible educational outline. However, since students are educated mainly in national languages, the literature in these languages might gain priority over more internationally recognized publications available only in English. Then, the question arises if scholars who might be recognized globally due to their presence in large, international bibliographic databases retain their visibility and influence at the national level. We conduct a comparative bibliometric study using Scopus, Web of Science, and BazEkon to answer this question. Our research reveals that for the case of Poland, information and social networks of management methodology scholars do not support the assumption of direct visibility of such global scholars at the national level, thus putting into question the reliability of global bibliographic databases to study management at the national level.","PeriodicalId":40066,"journal":{"name":"Business: Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GLOBAL AND NATIONAL VISIBILITY OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH METHODOLOGY SCHOLARS – THE CASE OF POLAND\",\"authors\":\"O. Kosch, M. Szarucki, Ilona Skačkauskienė\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/btp.2023.18655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Developing research methodology contributes to better management research outputs, links better management theory to business practice, as well as enriches the academic training received by the students at universities. Researchers might be tempted to provide generalizations on management research methodology based on global bibliographic databases, such as Scopus and Web of Science, and draw conclusions on the possible educational outline. However, since students are educated mainly in national languages, the literature in these languages might gain priority over more internationally recognized publications available only in English. Then, the question arises if scholars who might be recognized globally due to their presence in large, international bibliographic databases retain their visibility and influence at the national level. We conduct a comparative bibliometric study using Scopus, Web of Science, and BazEkon to answer this question. Our research reveals that for the case of Poland, information and social networks of management methodology scholars do not support the assumption of direct visibility of such global scholars at the national level, thus putting into question the reliability of global bibliographic databases to study management at the national level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business: Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business: Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2023.18655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2023.18655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发展研究方法有助于更好的管理研究成果,将更好的管理理论与商业实践联系起来,并丰富大学学生接受的学术培训。研究人员可能会试图根据Scopus和Web of Science等全球书目数据库对管理研究方法进行概括,并就可能的教育大纲得出结论。然而,由于学生主要以民族语言接受教育,这些语言的文学作品可能会优先于仅以英语出版的国际公认出版物。然后,问题来了,那些由于在大型国际书目数据库中的存在而可能在全球范围内获得认可的学者是否能在国家层面保持其知名度和影响力。我们使用Scopus、Web of Science和BazEkon进行了一项比较文献计量学研究来回答这个问题。我们的研究表明,就波兰而言,管理方法论学者的信息和社会网络不支持这种全球学者在国家层面直接可见性的假设,从而使全球书目数据库在国家层面研究管理的可靠性受到质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GLOBAL AND NATIONAL VISIBILITY OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH METHODOLOGY SCHOLARS – THE CASE OF POLAND
Developing research methodology contributes to better management research outputs, links better management theory to business practice, as well as enriches the academic training received by the students at universities. Researchers might be tempted to provide generalizations on management research methodology based on global bibliographic databases, such as Scopus and Web of Science, and draw conclusions on the possible educational outline. However, since students are educated mainly in national languages, the literature in these languages might gain priority over more internationally recognized publications available only in English. Then, the question arises if scholars who might be recognized globally due to their presence in large, international bibliographic databases retain their visibility and influence at the national level. We conduct a comparative bibliometric study using Scopus, Web of Science, and BazEkon to answer this question. Our research reveals that for the case of Poland, information and social networks of management methodology scholars do not support the assumption of direct visibility of such global scholars at the national level, thus putting into question the reliability of global bibliographic databases to study management at the national level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Business: Theory and Practice
Business: Theory and Practice Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Business: Theory and Practice" is published from 2000. 1 vol (4 issues) per year are published. Articles in Lithuanian, English, German, Russian. The Journal has been included into database "ICONDA" and "Business Source Complete".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信