大坝能改善印度的水安全吗?对事后评估的审查

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Amruta Pradhan , Veena Srinivasan
{"title":"大坝能改善印度的水安全吗?对事后评估的审查","authors":"Amruta Pradhan ,&nbsp;Veena Srinivasan","doi":"10.1016/j.wasec.2022.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Today India is the third largest dam building country in the world with over five thousand large dams. However, despite the significantly large expenditure, the actual area irrigated by canal has shown an overall decline since 1991. Today, more than 60% of India’s irrigation happens through groundwater. Evaluation reports by official agencies like Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), and independent evaluations by civil society organizations have pointed out to the poor performance of dams during construction, operation and maintenance. Despite this, the narrative that the dams “play a vital role in providing overall water security to the country” has not been validated with help of a closer look at the empirical evidence on performance of dams in the academia.</p><p>To address this, we embark on a comprehensive socio-hydrologic review of evaluation studies to understand if large dams have in fact improved water security defined broadly (beyond just the canal command area). We ask two questions (i) What types of studies have been conducted? (ii) What do they collectively say about dams improving water security?</p><p>We find that while the engineers and experts have ex-ante promised water security through dams, the ex-post studies have highlighted several pathways through which dams adversely affect water security. They essentially highlight the tradeoffs between water security of different stakeholders and bring out the ‘losers’ that go unnoticed. Growing empirical evidence shows that despite massive investments, dams are unable to deliver on their promises. We argue that this repeated under-performance suggests that the inherent ‘social-technical’ nature of irrigation systems has not been internalized in the dam design process.</p><p>In the way forward, we have discussed the need to design and implement dams as socio-technical systems, need for empirical field-based ex-post research to establish factual evidence. Further, it must feed back into ex-ante water planning. Structured processes like shared vision planning can be used to negotiate competing normative claims.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37308,"journal":{"name":"Water Security","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do dams improve water security in India? A review of post facto assessments\",\"authors\":\"Amruta Pradhan ,&nbsp;Veena Srinivasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wasec.2022.100112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Today India is the third largest dam building country in the world with over five thousand large dams. However, despite the significantly large expenditure, the actual area irrigated by canal has shown an overall decline since 1991. Today, more than 60% of India’s irrigation happens through groundwater. Evaluation reports by official agencies like Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), and independent evaluations by civil society organizations have pointed out to the poor performance of dams during construction, operation and maintenance. Despite this, the narrative that the dams “play a vital role in providing overall water security to the country” has not been validated with help of a closer look at the empirical evidence on performance of dams in the academia.</p><p>To address this, we embark on a comprehensive socio-hydrologic review of evaluation studies to understand if large dams have in fact improved water security defined broadly (beyond just the canal command area). We ask two questions (i) What types of studies have been conducted? (ii) What do they collectively say about dams improving water security?</p><p>We find that while the engineers and experts have ex-ante promised water security through dams, the ex-post studies have highlighted several pathways through which dams adversely affect water security. They essentially highlight the tradeoffs between water security of different stakeholders and bring out the ‘losers’ that go unnoticed. Growing empirical evidence shows that despite massive investments, dams are unable to deliver on their promises. We argue that this repeated under-performance suggests that the inherent ‘social-technical’ nature of irrigation systems has not been internalized in the dam design process.</p><p>In the way forward, we have discussed the need to design and implement dams as socio-technical systems, need for empirical field-based ex-post research to establish factual evidence. Further, it must feed back into ex-ante water planning. Structured processes like shared vision planning can be used to negotiate competing normative claims.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Security\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468312422000037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468312422000037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

如今,印度是世界上第三大水坝建设国,拥有5000多座大坝。然而,尽管花费很大,运河灌溉的实际面积自1991年以来总体下降。如今,印度超过60%的灌溉是通过地下水进行的。印度审计长和审计长(CAG)等官方机构的评估报告,以及民间社会组织的独立评估都指出,大坝在建设、运营和维护期间表现不佳。尽管如此,大坝“在为国家提供整体水安全方面发挥着至关重要的作用”的说法,并没有得到学术界对大坝性能的经验证据的进一步验证。为了解决这个问题,我们开始对评估研究进行全面的社会水文审查,以了解大型水坝是否确实改善了广义上的水安全(不仅仅是运河指挥区域)。我们提出两个问题:(i)进行了哪些类型的研究?(ii)他们对大坝改善水安全有何共同看法?我们发现,虽然工程师和专家事前承诺通过大坝实现水安全,但事后研究强调了大坝对水安全产生不利影响的几种途径。它们本质上强调了不同利益相关者之间的水安全权衡,并指出了被忽视的“输家”。越来越多的经验证据表明,尽管投资巨大,但大坝无法兑现承诺。我们认为,这种反复的表现不佳表明,灌溉系统固有的“社会技术”性质在大坝设计过程中没有被内化。在未来的道路上,我们讨论了将水坝设计和实施作为社会技术系统的必要性,以及为建立事实证据而进行实地实证研究的必要性。此外,它必须反馈到事前的水资源规划中。像共享愿景规划这样的结构化过程可以用来协商相互竞争的规范要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do dams improve water security in India? A review of post facto assessments

Today India is the third largest dam building country in the world with over five thousand large dams. However, despite the significantly large expenditure, the actual area irrigated by canal has shown an overall decline since 1991. Today, more than 60% of India’s irrigation happens through groundwater. Evaluation reports by official agencies like Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), and independent evaluations by civil society organizations have pointed out to the poor performance of dams during construction, operation and maintenance. Despite this, the narrative that the dams “play a vital role in providing overall water security to the country” has not been validated with help of a closer look at the empirical evidence on performance of dams in the academia.

To address this, we embark on a comprehensive socio-hydrologic review of evaluation studies to understand if large dams have in fact improved water security defined broadly (beyond just the canal command area). We ask two questions (i) What types of studies have been conducted? (ii) What do they collectively say about dams improving water security?

We find that while the engineers and experts have ex-ante promised water security through dams, the ex-post studies have highlighted several pathways through which dams adversely affect water security. They essentially highlight the tradeoffs between water security of different stakeholders and bring out the ‘losers’ that go unnoticed. Growing empirical evidence shows that despite massive investments, dams are unable to deliver on their promises. We argue that this repeated under-performance suggests that the inherent ‘social-technical’ nature of irrigation systems has not been internalized in the dam design process.

In the way forward, we have discussed the need to design and implement dams as socio-technical systems, need for empirical field-based ex-post research to establish factual evidence. Further, it must feed back into ex-ante water planning. Structured processes like shared vision planning can be used to negotiate competing normative claims.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Security
Water Security Earth and Planetary Sciences-Oceanography
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Water Security aims to publish papers that contribute to a better understanding of the economic, social, biophysical, technological, and institutional influencers of current and future global water security. At the same time the journal intends to stimulate debate, backed by science, with strong interdisciplinary connections. The goal is to publish concise and timely reviews and synthesis articles about research covering the following elements of water security: -Shortage- Flooding- Governance- Health and Sanitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信