在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆,粪便污泥衍生炭块作为替代烹饪能源的潜在用途

Petro Mwamlima , Aloyce W. Mayo , Sara Gabrielsson , Richard Kimwaga
{"title":"在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆,粪便污泥衍生炭块作为替代烹饪能源的潜在用途","authors":"Petro Mwamlima ,&nbsp;Aloyce W. Mayo ,&nbsp;Sara Gabrielsson ,&nbsp;Richard Kimwaga","doi":"10.1016/j.heha.2023.100068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coprophobia characterizes faecal sludge (FS) as an unpleasing raw or partially digested faecal waste with no recycling value. However, this so-called waste is claimed to have tremendous recycling values after being pyrolyzed. This study hypothesized that char briquettes made from FS might have the potential of replacing charcoal consumption in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Quantitative methods were used to examine the proximate, emissions and environmental benefits of faecal sludge char briquettes in comparison to wood charcoal from <em>Dalbergia melanoxylon</em> (locally known as Mpingo). Results revealed that FS collected during the dry season exhibited a higher total solids content (26%) compared to that collected during the rainy season (20%). This difference was statistically significant (p = 6.12405E-14 at α=0.05). Dewatering and further drying the FS to a minimum of 90% total solids yielded an energy value of 11-12 MJ/kg, which was lower than that of uncarbonized wood (firewood) at 19 MJ/kg. Production of FS char briquettes bonded by paper waste has a lower energy value (13 MJ/kg) than that bonded by cassava starch (14.6 MJ/kg). The average energy value of FS char briquettes is almost half that of wood charcoal (26 MJ/kg), meaning that the replacement of 1 kg of charcoal consumption would require 2 kg of FS char briquettes is required. Nevertheless, due to an ineffective collection of FS to be used in the production of char briquettes, only 8% of charcoal consumption in the city can be replaced. It is recommended to use the produced briquettes in open kitchens with ample oxygen circulation, as they emit carbon monoxide levels exceeding the allowable limits set by the Tanzania Bureau of Standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73269,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential use of faecal sludge derived char briquettes as an alternative cooking energy source in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Petro Mwamlima ,&nbsp;Aloyce W. Mayo ,&nbsp;Sara Gabrielsson ,&nbsp;Richard Kimwaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heha.2023.100068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Coprophobia characterizes faecal sludge (FS) as an unpleasing raw or partially digested faecal waste with no recycling value. However, this so-called waste is claimed to have tremendous recycling values after being pyrolyzed. This study hypothesized that char briquettes made from FS might have the potential of replacing charcoal consumption in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Quantitative methods were used to examine the proximate, emissions and environmental benefits of faecal sludge char briquettes in comparison to wood charcoal from <em>Dalbergia melanoxylon</em> (locally known as Mpingo). Results revealed that FS collected during the dry season exhibited a higher total solids content (26%) compared to that collected during the rainy season (20%). This difference was statistically significant (p = 6.12405E-14 at α=0.05). Dewatering and further drying the FS to a minimum of 90% total solids yielded an energy value of 11-12 MJ/kg, which was lower than that of uncarbonized wood (firewood) at 19 MJ/kg. Production of FS char briquettes bonded by paper waste has a lower energy value (13 MJ/kg) than that bonded by cassava starch (14.6 MJ/kg). The average energy value of FS char briquettes is almost half that of wood charcoal (26 MJ/kg), meaning that the replacement of 1 kg of charcoal consumption would require 2 kg of FS char briquettes is required. Nevertheless, due to an ineffective collection of FS to be used in the production of char briquettes, only 8% of charcoal consumption in the city can be replaced. It is recommended to use the produced briquettes in open kitchens with ample oxygen circulation, as they emit carbon monoxide levels exceeding the allowable limits set by the Tanzania Bureau of Standards.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hygiene and environmental health advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hygiene and environmental health advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049223000247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049223000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粪泥恐惧症的特点是粪便污泥是一种令人讨厌的未经处理或部分消化的粪便废物,没有回收价值。然而,这种所谓的废物在被热解后据称具有巨大的回收价值。这项研究假设,在坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆,由FS制成的炭块可能有取代木炭消费的潜力。采用定量方法,比较了粪便污泥炭型煤与黑檀(当地称为Mpingo)木炭的近因、排放和环境效益。结果表明,旱季收集的FS总固体含量(26%)高于雨季收集的FS(20%)。差异有统计学意义(p = 6.12405E-14, α=0.05)。将FS脱水并进一步干燥至至少90%的总固体,其能量值为11-12 MJ/kg,低于未碳化木材(木柴)的19 MJ/kg。造纸废弃物黏结FS型煤的能量值(13 MJ/kg)低于木薯淀粉黏结FS型煤的能量值(14.6 MJ/kg)。FS型煤的平均能量值几乎是木质木炭的一半(26兆焦耳/公斤),这意味着每消耗1公斤木炭,就需要消耗2公斤FS型煤。然而,由于无法有效收集用于生产炭型煤的FS,该市只有8%的木炭消耗量可以被替代。建议在氧气流通充足的开放式厨房中使用生产的压块,因为它们排放的一氧化碳含量超过了坦桑尼亚标准局规定的允许限值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Potential use of faecal sludge derived char briquettes as an alternative cooking energy source in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Potential use of faecal sludge derived char briquettes as an alternative cooking energy source in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Coprophobia characterizes faecal sludge (FS) as an unpleasing raw or partially digested faecal waste with no recycling value. However, this so-called waste is claimed to have tremendous recycling values after being pyrolyzed. This study hypothesized that char briquettes made from FS might have the potential of replacing charcoal consumption in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Quantitative methods were used to examine the proximate, emissions and environmental benefits of faecal sludge char briquettes in comparison to wood charcoal from Dalbergia melanoxylon (locally known as Mpingo). Results revealed that FS collected during the dry season exhibited a higher total solids content (26%) compared to that collected during the rainy season (20%). This difference was statistically significant (p = 6.12405E-14 at α=0.05). Dewatering and further drying the FS to a minimum of 90% total solids yielded an energy value of 11-12 MJ/kg, which was lower than that of uncarbonized wood (firewood) at 19 MJ/kg. Production of FS char briquettes bonded by paper waste has a lower energy value (13 MJ/kg) than that bonded by cassava starch (14.6 MJ/kg). The average energy value of FS char briquettes is almost half that of wood charcoal (26 MJ/kg), meaning that the replacement of 1 kg of charcoal consumption would require 2 kg of FS char briquettes is required. Nevertheless, due to an ineffective collection of FS to be used in the production of char briquettes, only 8% of charcoal consumption in the city can be replaced. It is recommended to use the produced briquettes in open kitchens with ample oxygen circulation, as they emit carbon monoxide levels exceeding the allowable limits set by the Tanzania Bureau of Standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hygiene and environmental health advances
Hygiene and environmental health advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信