我们不被视为陌生人;我们被视为人民的一部分

Q2 Arts and Humanities
T. Rausch
{"title":"我们不被视为陌生人;我们被视为人民的一部分","authors":"T. Rausch","doi":"10.1558/jalpp.20371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While many discourse analysts have explored the frame semantics of risk and health communication during outbreak response from media or doctor–patient perspectives, the discourse patterns of members of health organisations remain largely unexplored. This article is specifically concerned with risk construction processes during pandemics through the added value of understanding the communication patterns of African health experts, who have been found to be insufficiently included in outbreak response. I examine how members of an African health consortium express evaluative stance on outbreak response mechanisms, with a particular focus on the West African Ebola epidemic (2013–2016), and on their own work. I explore how they draw on stance to construct an organisational identity in the international field of outbreak management. Conducted as part of a 12-month ethnographic study, I focus on interviews with organisational members and draw on Appraisal theory to conduct a systematic analysis of the speakers’ expressions of stance. The article’s contributions are two-fold: it expands the study of the communicative processes in the field of emerging pathogens to the context of African health consortiums, and it establishes how an underrepresented expert group negotiates access and claims space in the debate on outbreak response.","PeriodicalId":52122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘We’re not seen as strangers; we’re seen as part of the people’\",\"authors\":\"T. Rausch\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/jalpp.20371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While many discourse analysts have explored the frame semantics of risk and health communication during outbreak response from media or doctor–patient perspectives, the discourse patterns of members of health organisations remain largely unexplored. This article is specifically concerned with risk construction processes during pandemics through the added value of understanding the communication patterns of African health experts, who have been found to be insufficiently included in outbreak response. I examine how members of an African health consortium express evaluative stance on outbreak response mechanisms, with a particular focus on the West African Ebola epidemic (2013–2016), and on their own work. I explore how they draw on stance to construct an organisational identity in the international field of outbreak management. Conducted as part of a 12-month ethnographic study, I focus on interviews with organisational members and draw on Appraisal theory to conduct a systematic analysis of the speakers’ expressions of stance. The article’s contributions are two-fold: it expands the study of the communicative processes in the field of emerging pathogens to the context of African health consortiums, and it establishes how an underrepresented expert group negotiates access and claims space in the debate on outbreak response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.20371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.20371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然许多话语分析人士从媒体或医患角度探索了疫情应对期间风险和健康沟通的框架语义,但卫生组织成员的话语模式在很大程度上仍未被探索。本文通过了解非洲卫生专家的沟通模式的附加价值,特别关注大流行期间的风险构建过程,人们发现非洲卫生专家没有充分参与疫情应对。我研究了非洲卫生联盟成员如何表达对疫情应对机制的评估立场,特别关注西非埃博拉疫情(2013-2016年)和他们自己的工作。我探索他们如何利用立场来构建一个组织身份在国际领域的爆发管理。作为一项为期12个月的民族志研究的一部分,我专注于对组织成员的采访,并利用评估理论对说话者的立场表达进行系统分析。这篇文章的贡献有两方面:它将对新出现病原体领域交流过程的研究扩展到非洲卫生联盟的背景下,并确定了一个代表性不足的专家组如何在关于疫情应对的辩论中协商获取和要求空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘We’re not seen as strangers; we’re seen as part of the people’
While many discourse analysts have explored the frame semantics of risk and health communication during outbreak response from media or doctor–patient perspectives, the discourse patterns of members of health organisations remain largely unexplored. This article is specifically concerned with risk construction processes during pandemics through the added value of understanding the communication patterns of African health experts, who have been found to be insufficiently included in outbreak response. I examine how members of an African health consortium express evaluative stance on outbreak response mechanisms, with a particular focus on the West African Ebola epidemic (2013–2016), and on their own work. I explore how they draw on stance to construct an organisational identity in the international field of outbreak management. Conducted as part of a 12-month ethnographic study, I focus on interviews with organisational members and draw on Appraisal theory to conduct a systematic analysis of the speakers’ expressions of stance. The article’s contributions are two-fold: it expands the study of the communicative processes in the field of emerging pathogens to the context of African health consortiums, and it establishes how an underrepresented expert group negotiates access and claims space in the debate on outbreak response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice
Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice was launched in 2004 (under the title Journal of Applied Linguistics) with the aim of advancing research and practice in applied linguistics as a principled and interdisciplinary endeavour. From Volume 7, the journal adopted the new title to reflect the continuation, expansion and re-specification of the field of applied linguistics as originally conceived. Moving away from a primary focus on research into language teaching/learning and second language acquisition, the education profession will remain a key site but one among many, with an active engagement of the journal moving to sites from a variety of other professional domains such as law, healthcare, counselling, journalism, business interpreting and translating, where applied linguists have major contributions to make. Accordingly, under the new title, the journal will reflexively foreground applied linguistics as professional practice. As before, each volume will contain a selection of special features such as editorials, specialist conversations, debates and dialogues on specific methodological themes, review articles, research notes and targeted special issues addressing key themes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信