基于人工智能的自动评分的优化实现:基于人工智能评分的评估设计的循证设计方法

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Kadriye Ercikan, Daniel F. McCaffrey
{"title":"基于人工智能的自动评分的优化实现:基于人工智能评分的评估设计的循证设计方法","authors":"Kadriye Ercikan,&nbsp;Daniel F. McCaffrey","doi":"10.1111/jedm.12332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial-intelligence-based automated scoring is often an afterthought and is considered after assessments have been developed, resulting in nonoptimal possibility of implementing automated scoring solutions. In this article, we provide a review of Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methodologies for scoring in educational assessments. We then propose an evidence-centered design framework for developing assessments to align conceptualization, scoring, and ultimate assessment interpretation and use with the advantages and limitations of AI-based scoring in mind. We provide recommendations for defining construct, task, and evidence models to guide task and assessment design that optimize the development and implementation of AI-based automated scoring of constructed response items and support the validity of inferences from and uses of scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":47871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Measurement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Implementation of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Automated Scoring: An Evidence Centered Design Approach for Designing Assessments for AI-based Scoring\",\"authors\":\"Kadriye Ercikan,&nbsp;Daniel F. McCaffrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jedm.12332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Artificial-intelligence-based automated scoring is often an afterthought and is considered after assessments have been developed, resulting in nonoptimal possibility of implementing automated scoring solutions. In this article, we provide a review of Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methodologies for scoring in educational assessments. We then propose an evidence-centered design framework for developing assessments to align conceptualization, scoring, and ultimate assessment interpretation and use with the advantages and limitations of AI-based scoring in mind. We provide recommendations for defining construct, task, and evidence models to guide task and assessment design that optimize the development and implementation of AI-based automated scoring of constructed response items and support the validity of inferences from and uses of scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Measurement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jedm.12332\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jedm.12332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

基于人工智能的自动评分通常是事后才考虑的,并且是在评估开发之后才考虑的,这导致了实施自动评分解决方案的非最佳可能性。在本文中,我们对基于人工智能(AI)的教育评估评分方法进行了综述。然后,我们提出了一个以证据为中心的设计框架,用于开发评估,以使概念化,评分,最终评估解释和使用与基于人工智能的评分的优点和局限性保持一致。我们提供了定义构建、任务和证据模型的建议,以指导任务和评估设计,优化基于人工智能的构建响应项目自动评分的开发和实现,并支持从得分中推断和使用的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Implementation of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Automated Scoring: An Evidence Centered Design Approach for Designing Assessments for AI-based Scoring

Artificial-intelligence-based automated scoring is often an afterthought and is considered after assessments have been developed, resulting in nonoptimal possibility of implementing automated scoring solutions. In this article, we provide a review of Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methodologies for scoring in educational assessments. We then propose an evidence-centered design framework for developing assessments to align conceptualization, scoring, and ultimate assessment interpretation and use with the advantages and limitations of AI-based scoring in mind. We provide recommendations for defining construct, task, and evidence models to guide task and assessment design that optimize the development and implementation of AI-based automated scoring of constructed response items and support the validity of inferences from and uses of scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Educational Measurement (JEM) publishes original measurement research, provides reviews of measurement publications, and reports on innovative measurement applications. The topics addressed will interest those concerned with the practice of measurement in field settings, as well as be of interest to measurement theorists. In addition to presenting new contributions to measurement theory and practice, JEM also serves as a vehicle for improving educational measurement applications in a variety of settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信