辅助生殖技术环境下剩余胚胎的命运:范围界定综述

IF 0.5 Q4 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
I. Agung Sentosa, S. Ayuandari, Rafhani Rosyidah, Agung Dewanto
{"title":"辅助生殖技术环境下剩余胚胎的命运:范围界定综述","authors":"I. Agung Sentosa, S. Ayuandari, Rafhani Rosyidah, Agung Dewanto","doi":"10.4103/2305-0500.365226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To identify the attitudes of infertile couples toward their surplus frozen embryos. Methods: This study was according to PRISMA-ScR as the guideline for scoping review. Studies that assessed the attitudes of patients or infertile couples who had surplus embryos were included. We conducted systematic searches in English studies from April 2011-April 2021 using 7 databases: PubMed, Science Direct, EBSCO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Sage Journals, and Google Scholar. Data were charted based on author, year of publication, country, purpose, data collection, key findings, and research focus/domain. Results: A total of 37 research articles were included in the analysis. Their attitudes encompassed: supporting the donation of the surplus embryos for both research and reproductive purposes, continuing to store the frozen embryos, and disposing of the surplus embryos. Conclusions: Most of the infertile patients support donating their surplus embryos for research and reproductive purposes.","PeriodicalId":8564,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction","volume":"12 1","pages":"1 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The fate of surplus embryos in the setting of assisted reproductive technology: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"I. Agung Sentosa, S. Ayuandari, Rafhani Rosyidah, Agung Dewanto\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2305-0500.365226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To identify the attitudes of infertile couples toward their surplus frozen embryos. Methods: This study was according to PRISMA-ScR as the guideline for scoping review. Studies that assessed the attitudes of patients or infertile couples who had surplus embryos were included. We conducted systematic searches in English studies from April 2011-April 2021 using 7 databases: PubMed, Science Direct, EBSCO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Sage Journals, and Google Scholar. Data were charted based on author, year of publication, country, purpose, data collection, key findings, and research focus/domain. Results: A total of 37 research articles were included in the analysis. Their attitudes encompassed: supporting the donation of the surplus embryos for both research and reproductive purposes, continuing to store the frozen embryos, and disposing of the surplus embryos. Conclusions: Most of the infertile patients support donating their surplus embryos for research and reproductive purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2305-0500.365226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2305-0500.365226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解不孕夫妇对剩余冷冻胚胎的态度。方法:本研究以PRISMA ScR为指导进行范围审查。研究评估了胚胎过剩的患者或不孕夫妇的态度。从2011年4月到2021年4月,我们使用7个数据库对英语研究进行了系统搜索:PubMed、Science Direct、EBSCO、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Sage Journals和Google Scholar。数据是根据作者、出版年份、国家、目的、数据收集、关键发现和研究重点/领域绘制的。结果:共有37篇研究文章被纳入分析。他们的态度包括:支持捐赠多余的胚胎用于研究和生殖目的,继续储存冷冻胚胎,以及处理多余的胚胎。结论:大多数不孕患者支持将剩余胚胎捐献用于研究和生殖目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The fate of surplus embryos in the setting of assisted reproductive technology: A scoping review
Objective: To identify the attitudes of infertile couples toward their surplus frozen embryos. Methods: This study was according to PRISMA-ScR as the guideline for scoping review. Studies that assessed the attitudes of patients or infertile couples who had surplus embryos were included. We conducted systematic searches in English studies from April 2011-April 2021 using 7 databases: PubMed, Science Direct, EBSCO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Sage Journals, and Google Scholar. Data were charted based on author, year of publication, country, purpose, data collection, key findings, and research focus/domain. Results: A total of 37 research articles were included in the analysis. Their attitudes encompassed: supporting the donation of the surplus embryos for both research and reproductive purposes, continuing to store the frozen embryos, and disposing of the surplus embryos. Conclusions: Most of the infertile patients support donating their surplus embryos for research and reproductive purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction
Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
588
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信