关于流星

Aviv Elor, Michael Powell, Evanjelin Mahmoodi, Nico Hawthorne, M. Teodorescu, S. Kurniawan
{"title":"关于流星","authors":"Aviv Elor, Michael Powell, Evanjelin Mahmoodi, Nico Hawthorne, M. Teodorescu, S. Kurniawan","doi":"10.1145/3396249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inactivity and a lack of engagement with exercise is a pressing health problem in the United States and beyond. Immersive Virtual Reality (iVR) is a promising medium to motivate users through engaging virtual environments. Currently, modern iVR lacks a comparative analysis between research and consumer-grade systems for exercise and health. This article examines two such iVR mediums: the Cave Automated Virtual Environment (CAVE) and the head-mounted display (HMD). Specifically, we compare the room-scale Mechdyne CAVE and HTC Vive Pro HMD with a custom in-house exercise game that was designed such that user experiences were as consistent as possible between both systems. To ensure that our findings are generalizable for users of varying abilities, we recruited 40 participants with and without cognitive disabilities with regard to the fact that iVR environments and games can differ in their cognitive challenge between users. Our results show that across all abilities, the HMD excelled in in-game performance, biofeedback response, and player engagement. We conclude with considerations in utilizing iVR systems for exergaming with users across cognitive abilities.","PeriodicalId":72043,"journal":{"name":"ACM transactions on computing for healthcare","volume":"1 1","pages":"1 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/3396249","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Shooting Stars\",\"authors\":\"Aviv Elor, Michael Powell, Evanjelin Mahmoodi, Nico Hawthorne, M. Teodorescu, S. Kurniawan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3396249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inactivity and a lack of engagement with exercise is a pressing health problem in the United States and beyond. Immersive Virtual Reality (iVR) is a promising medium to motivate users through engaging virtual environments. Currently, modern iVR lacks a comparative analysis between research and consumer-grade systems for exercise and health. This article examines two such iVR mediums: the Cave Automated Virtual Environment (CAVE) and the head-mounted display (HMD). Specifically, we compare the room-scale Mechdyne CAVE and HTC Vive Pro HMD with a custom in-house exercise game that was designed such that user experiences were as consistent as possible between both systems. To ensure that our findings are generalizable for users of varying abilities, we recruited 40 participants with and without cognitive disabilities with regard to the fact that iVR environments and games can differ in their cognitive challenge between users. Our results show that across all abilities, the HMD excelled in in-game performance, biofeedback response, and player engagement. We conclude with considerations in utilizing iVR systems for exergaming with users across cognitive abilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM transactions on computing for healthcare\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/3396249\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM transactions on computing for healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM transactions on computing for healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

在美国和其他国家,缺乏运动和缺乏锻炼是一个紧迫的健康问题。沉浸式虚拟现实(iVR)是一种很有前途的媒介,可以通过参与虚拟环境来激励用户。目前,现代iVR缺乏研究和消费级运动和健康系统之间的比较分析。本文研究了两种iVR媒介:Cave自动化虚拟环境(Cave)和头戴式显示器(HMD)。具体来说,我们将房间大小的Mechdyne CAVE和HTC Vive Pro HMD与一款定制的内部运动游戏进行了比较,这款游戏的设计使两个系统之间的用户体验尽可能一致。为了确保我们的发现适用于不同能力的用户,我们招募了40名有或没有认知障碍的参与者,考虑到iVR环境和游戏在用户之间的认知挑战可能不同。我们的研究结果显示,在所有能力中,HMD在游戏中的表现、生物反馈反应和玩家粘性方面都表现出色。我们总结了利用iVR系统与不同认知能力的用户进行游戏的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Shooting Stars
Inactivity and a lack of engagement with exercise is a pressing health problem in the United States and beyond. Immersive Virtual Reality (iVR) is a promising medium to motivate users through engaging virtual environments. Currently, modern iVR lacks a comparative analysis between research and consumer-grade systems for exercise and health. This article examines two such iVR mediums: the Cave Automated Virtual Environment (CAVE) and the head-mounted display (HMD). Specifically, we compare the room-scale Mechdyne CAVE and HTC Vive Pro HMD with a custom in-house exercise game that was designed such that user experiences were as consistent as possible between both systems. To ensure that our findings are generalizable for users of varying abilities, we recruited 40 participants with and without cognitive disabilities with regard to the fact that iVR environments and games can differ in their cognitive challenge between users. Our results show that across all abilities, the HMD excelled in in-game performance, biofeedback response, and player engagement. We conclude with considerations in utilizing iVR systems for exergaming with users across cognitive abilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信