承重软砖无加固砌体桥墩的地震易损性评价

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jayaprakash Vemuri , Tariq Anwar , KVL Subramaniam
{"title":"承重软砖无加固砌体桥墩的地震易损性评价","authors":"Jayaprakash Vemuri ,&nbsp;Tariq Anwar ,&nbsp;KVL Subramaniam","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unreinforced masonry (URM) made with soft bricks comprises a large percentage of the building stock in developing countries. However, the poor performance of URM piers during earthquakes has led to renewed interest in understanding their behavior under lateral loads. Little experimental data is available on the seismic response, analysis, and design of URMs made of soft bricks. In this study, the micro-modeling technique is used to simulate the in-plane behavior of load-bearing, soft-brick URM piers. The parameters required in the constitutive models are obtained from material tests and used to develop a calibrated numerical model of the URM piers. Piers with various aspect ratios subjected to various axial stresses are numerically modeled to obtain monotonic and cyclic responses, and their critical displacement limit states are identified. Changes in the failure modes of masonry piers with variations in the aspect ratio and axial stress are established. Load-bearing piers exhibit three distinct failure modes: bed sliding, diagonal shear cracking, and flexure, depending on the aspect ratio and axial stress. The seismic fragility of each pier failure type is examined using nonlinear time history analyses. The results show that bed-sliding piers collapse at extremely low PGA levels. Piers failing through diagonal shear cracking also fail at low PGA levels. Flexural piers can resist seismic forces up to a slightly higher PGA level and thus are the last to collapse. The results also indicate that the effect of uncertainty in ground motions is more significant than the effect of variability in the masonry pier capacities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 277-287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000317/pdfft?md5=b47b5a2d29761c404fda8d87fb891bb9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666449622000317-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic fragility assessment of load‐bearing soft‐brick unreinforced masonry piers\",\"authors\":\"Jayaprakash Vemuri ,&nbsp;Tariq Anwar ,&nbsp;KVL Subramaniam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Unreinforced masonry (URM) made with soft bricks comprises a large percentage of the building stock in developing countries. However, the poor performance of URM piers during earthquakes has led to renewed interest in understanding their behavior under lateral loads. Little experimental data is available on the seismic response, analysis, and design of URMs made of soft bricks. In this study, the micro-modeling technique is used to simulate the in-plane behavior of load-bearing, soft-brick URM piers. The parameters required in the constitutive models are obtained from material tests and used to develop a calibrated numerical model of the URM piers. Piers with various aspect ratios subjected to various axial stresses are numerically modeled to obtain monotonic and cyclic responses, and their critical displacement limit states are identified. Changes in the failure modes of masonry piers with variations in the aspect ratio and axial stress are established. Load-bearing piers exhibit three distinct failure modes: bed sliding, diagonal shear cracking, and flexure, depending on the aspect ratio and axial stress. The seismic fragility of each pier failure type is examined using nonlinear time history analyses. The results show that bed-sliding piers collapse at extremely low PGA levels. Piers failing through diagonal shear cracking also fail at low PGA levels. Flexural piers can resist seismic forces up to a slightly higher PGA level and thus are the last to collapse. The results also indicate that the effect of uncertainty in ground motions is more significant than the effect of variability in the masonry pier capacities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":62710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"安全科学与韧性(英文)\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 277-287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000317/pdfft?md5=b47b5a2d29761c404fda8d87fb891bb9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666449622000317-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"安全科学与韧性(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在发展中国家,由软砖制成的无加固砌体(URM)占建筑存量的很大比例。然而,URM桥墩在地震中的不良性能引起了人们对其在横向荷载作用下的行为的重新关注。关于软砖砌体的地震反应、分析和设计的实验数据很少。在本研究中,采用微建模技术模拟了承重软砖URM桥墩的面内行为。本构模型所需的参数是从材料试验中获得的,并用于开发URM桥墩的校准数值模型。对不同宽高比桥墩在不同轴向应力作用下的单调和循环响应进行了数值模拟,并确定了桥墩的临界位移极限状态。建立了砌体桥墩破坏模式随纵横比和轴向应力变化的变化规律。根据纵横比和轴向应力的不同,承重桥墩表现出三种不同的破坏模式:河床滑动、斜向剪切开裂和弯曲。采用非线性时程分析方法研究了各桥墩破坏类型的地震易损性。结果表明,在极低的PGA水平下,滑床墩发生垮塌。桥墩在低PGA水平下也会发生斜剪开裂破坏。弯曲桥墩可以抵抗地震力达到略高的PGA水平,因此是最后倒塌的。结果还表明,地震动不确定性的影响比桥墩承载力变异性的影响更为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seismic fragility assessment of load‐bearing soft‐brick unreinforced masonry piers

Unreinforced masonry (URM) made with soft bricks comprises a large percentage of the building stock in developing countries. However, the poor performance of URM piers during earthquakes has led to renewed interest in understanding their behavior under lateral loads. Little experimental data is available on the seismic response, analysis, and design of URMs made of soft bricks. In this study, the micro-modeling technique is used to simulate the in-plane behavior of load-bearing, soft-brick URM piers. The parameters required in the constitutive models are obtained from material tests and used to develop a calibrated numerical model of the URM piers. Piers with various aspect ratios subjected to various axial stresses are numerically modeled to obtain monotonic and cyclic responses, and their critical displacement limit states are identified. Changes in the failure modes of masonry piers with variations in the aspect ratio and axial stress are established. Load-bearing piers exhibit three distinct failure modes: bed sliding, diagonal shear cracking, and flexure, depending on the aspect ratio and axial stress. The seismic fragility of each pier failure type is examined using nonlinear time history analyses. The results show that bed-sliding piers collapse at extremely low PGA levels. Piers failing through diagonal shear cracking also fail at low PGA levels. Flexural piers can resist seismic forces up to a slightly higher PGA level and thus are the last to collapse. The results also indicate that the effect of uncertainty in ground motions is more significant than the effect of variability in the masonry pier capacities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信