后漏斗入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤

IF 0.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
J. Geers, J. Jaekers, H. Topal, André Collignon, B. Topal
{"title":"后漏斗入路腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤","authors":"J. Geers, J. Jaekers, H. Topal, André Collignon, B. Topal","doi":"10.5348/100100z04mc2022ra","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Aims: Bile duct injury (BDI) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Although the critical view of safety (CVS) concept is the most widely supported approach to prevent BDI, alternative approaches are used as well. The aim was to evaluate the incidence, severity, and management of bile duct injury in LC, using a posterior infundibular approach.\n\n Methods: This retrospective, monocentric cohort study includes patients who underwent LC for gallstone disease. Data were collected in a prospectively maintained database. Patients with BDI were identified and were analyzed in-depth.\n\n Results: Between 1999 and 2018, 8389 consecutive patients were included (M/F 3288/5101; mean age 55 (standard deviation; SD ± 17) years). Mean length of postoperative hospital stay was two days (SD ± 4). Fourteen patients died after LC and 21 patients were identified with BDI. Seventeen BDI (81%) patients were managed minimally invasive (14 endoscopic, 3 laparoscopic), and 4 patients via laparotomy (3 hepaticojejunostomy, 1 primary suture). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) after BDI repair were observed in 6 patients. There was no BDI-related mortality. Median follow-up time was 113 months (range 5–238).\n\n Conclusion: A posterior infundibular approach in LC was associated with a low incidence of BDI and no BDI-related mortality.\n","PeriodicalId":40532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a posterior infundibular approach\",\"authors\":\"J. Geers, J. Jaekers, H. Topal, André Collignon, B. Topal\",\"doi\":\"10.5348/100100z04mc2022ra\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Aims: Bile duct injury (BDI) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Although the critical view of safety (CVS) concept is the most widely supported approach to prevent BDI, alternative approaches are used as well. The aim was to evaluate the incidence, severity, and management of bile duct injury in LC, using a posterior infundibular approach.\\n\\n Methods: This retrospective, monocentric cohort study includes patients who underwent LC for gallstone disease. Data were collected in a prospectively maintained database. Patients with BDI were identified and were analyzed in-depth.\\n\\n Results: Between 1999 and 2018, 8389 consecutive patients were included (M/F 3288/5101; mean age 55 (standard deviation; SD ± 17) years). Mean length of postoperative hospital stay was two days (SD ± 4). Fourteen patients died after LC and 21 patients were identified with BDI. Seventeen BDI (81%) patients were managed minimally invasive (14 endoscopic, 3 laparoscopic), and 4 patients via laparotomy (3 hepaticojejunostomy, 1 primary suture). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) after BDI repair were observed in 6 patients. There was no BDI-related mortality. Median follow-up time was 113 months (range 5–238).\\n\\n Conclusion: A posterior infundibular approach in LC was associated with a low incidence of BDI and no BDI-related mortality.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":40532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5348/100100z04mc2022ra\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/100100z04mc2022ra","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中胆管损伤(BDI)对发病率和死亡率有重要影响。尽管安全批判观(CVS)概念是最广泛支持的预防BDI的方法,但其他方法也被使用。目的是评估LC中胆管损伤的发生率、严重程度和处理,采用后漏斗入路。方法:这项回顾性、单中心队列研究包括因胆结石疾病接受LC治疗的患者。数据收集在前瞻性维护的数据库中。确定并深入分析BDI患者。结果:在1999年至2018年期间,纳入了8389例连续患者(M/F 3288/5101;平均年龄55岁(标准差;SD±17)年)。术后平均住院时间为2天(SD±4)。LC术后死亡14例,BDI 21例。17例BDI患者(81%)采用微创治疗(内镜下14例,腹腔镜下3例),4例采用剖腹手术(肝空肠造口3例,一期缝合1例)。6例患者BDI修复后出现严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥3)。没有bdi相关的死亡率。中位随访时间为113个月(范围5-238)。结论:LC的漏斗后入路与BDI发生率低且无BDI相关死亡率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a posterior infundibular approach
Aims: Bile duct injury (BDI) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Although the critical view of safety (CVS) concept is the most widely supported approach to prevent BDI, alternative approaches are used as well. The aim was to evaluate the incidence, severity, and management of bile duct injury in LC, using a posterior infundibular approach. Methods: This retrospective, monocentric cohort study includes patients who underwent LC for gallstone disease. Data were collected in a prospectively maintained database. Patients with BDI were identified and were analyzed in-depth. Results: Between 1999 and 2018, 8389 consecutive patients were included (M/F 3288/5101; mean age 55 (standard deviation; SD ± 17) years). Mean length of postoperative hospital stay was two days (SD ± 4). Fourteen patients died after LC and 21 patients were identified with BDI. Seventeen BDI (81%) patients were managed minimally invasive (14 endoscopic, 3 laparoscopic), and 4 patients via laparotomy (3 hepaticojejunostomy, 1 primary suture). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) after BDI repair were observed in 6 patients. There was no BDI-related mortality. Median follow-up time was 113 months (range 5–238). Conclusion: A posterior infundibular approach in LC was associated with a low incidence of BDI and no BDI-related mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信