产后早期护理的评价

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Seda Karaçay Yıkar, Ebru Gözüyeşil, E. Nazik, Ebru Var
{"title":"产后早期护理的评价","authors":"Seda Karaçay Yıkar, Ebru Gözüyeşil, E. Nazik, Ebru Var","doi":"10.33808/clinexphealthsci.891578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Evaluation of the care given in the postpartum period is vital in terms of the quality of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate nursing care in the early postpartum period. \nMethods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in a postpartum clinic between December 2016 and January 2017 with 130 mothers in postpartum period, and 18 nurses and midwives working in the same postpartum clinic. Data were collected using a personal information form, and the Postpartum Nursing Care Evaluation Tool (PPNCET). The data analysis was conducted using percentages, arithmetic mean, independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis test. \nResults: The mean age of the mothers was 26.80 ± 4.90, and of the nurses and midwives was 35.83 ± 12.14. The mean PPNCET score of the mothers was 141.58 ± 32.03. The mean care subscale score of the mothers was 69.88 ± 12.06 and of the education subscale was 71.70 ± 19.97. \nThe mean PPNCET score of the nurses and midwives was 153.50 ± 23.18. The mean care subscale score of the nurses and midwives was 73.38 ± 8.84, and the mean education subscale score was 80.11 ± 14.33. \nConclusions: The mean PPNCET score of mothers and nurses and midwives were higher than the average. Higher PPNCET scores of the nurses and midwives compared to the mothers suggests that either the postpartum care given was not perceived as adequate by the mothers, or the care was not served in adequate quality. To increase postpartum care satisfaction of the mothers, involving nurses and midwives in the care process more is suggested. In line with these results, planning in-service training programs to develop the knowledge and skills of the nurses and midwives would be beneficial in increasing the quality of service","PeriodicalId":10192,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Nursing Care in the Early Postpartum Period\",\"authors\":\"Seda Karaçay Yıkar, Ebru Gözüyeşil, E. Nazik, Ebru Var\",\"doi\":\"10.33808/clinexphealthsci.891578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Evaluation of the care given in the postpartum period is vital in terms of the quality of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate nursing care in the early postpartum period. \\nMethods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in a postpartum clinic between December 2016 and January 2017 with 130 mothers in postpartum period, and 18 nurses and midwives working in the same postpartum clinic. Data were collected using a personal information form, and the Postpartum Nursing Care Evaluation Tool (PPNCET). The data analysis was conducted using percentages, arithmetic mean, independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis test. \\nResults: The mean age of the mothers was 26.80 ± 4.90, and of the nurses and midwives was 35.83 ± 12.14. The mean PPNCET score of the mothers was 141.58 ± 32.03. The mean care subscale score of the mothers was 69.88 ± 12.06 and of the education subscale was 71.70 ± 19.97. \\nThe mean PPNCET score of the nurses and midwives was 153.50 ± 23.18. The mean care subscale score of the nurses and midwives was 73.38 ± 8.84, and the mean education subscale score was 80.11 ± 14.33. \\nConclusions: The mean PPNCET score of mothers and nurses and midwives were higher than the average. Higher PPNCET scores of the nurses and midwives compared to the mothers suggests that either the postpartum care given was not perceived as adequate by the mothers, or the care was not served in adequate quality. To increase postpartum care satisfaction of the mothers, involving nurses and midwives in the care process more is suggested. In line with these results, planning in-service training programs to develop the knowledge and skills of the nurses and midwives would be beneficial in increasing the quality of service\",\"PeriodicalId\":10192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.891578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.891578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估产后护理对护理质量至关重要。本研究的目的是评估产后早期的护理。方法:这项描述性和横断面研究于2016年12月至2017年1月在一家产后诊所进行,对象为130名产后母亲,以及在同一产后诊所工作的18名护士和助产士。使用个人信息表和产后护理评估工具(PPNCET)收集数据。使用百分比、算术平均值、独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行数据分析。结果:产妇平均年龄为26.80±4.90岁,护士和助产士平均年龄为35.83±12.14岁。母亲的PPNCET平均得分为141.58±32.03。母亲的护理分量表平均得分为69.88±12.06,教育分量表平均分为71.70±19.97。护士和助产士的PPNCET平均得分为153.50±23.18。护士和助产士的护理分量表平均得分为73.38±8.84,教育分量表平均分为80.11±14.33。结论:母亲、护士和助产士的PPNCET平均得分高于平均水平。与母亲相比,护士和助产士的PPNCET得分更高,这表明要么母亲认为产后护理不够充分,要么护理质量不够。为了提高产妇的产后护理满意度,建议护士和助产士更多地参与护理过程。根据这些结果,规划在职培训计划以发展护士和助产士的知识和技能将有助于提高服务质量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Nursing Care in the Early Postpartum Period
Objective: Evaluation of the care given in the postpartum period is vital in terms of the quality of care. The aim of this study was to evaluate nursing care in the early postpartum period. Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in a postpartum clinic between December 2016 and January 2017 with 130 mothers in postpartum period, and 18 nurses and midwives working in the same postpartum clinic. Data were collected using a personal information form, and the Postpartum Nursing Care Evaluation Tool (PPNCET). The data analysis was conducted using percentages, arithmetic mean, independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The mean age of the mothers was 26.80 ± 4.90, and of the nurses and midwives was 35.83 ± 12.14. The mean PPNCET score of the mothers was 141.58 ± 32.03. The mean care subscale score of the mothers was 69.88 ± 12.06 and of the education subscale was 71.70 ± 19.97. The mean PPNCET score of the nurses and midwives was 153.50 ± 23.18. The mean care subscale score of the nurses and midwives was 73.38 ± 8.84, and the mean education subscale score was 80.11 ± 14.33. Conclusions: The mean PPNCET score of mothers and nurses and midwives were higher than the average. Higher PPNCET scores of the nurses and midwives compared to the mothers suggests that either the postpartum care given was not perceived as adequate by the mothers, or the care was not served in adequate quality. To increase postpartum care satisfaction of the mothers, involving nurses and midwives in the care process more is suggested. In line with these results, planning in-service training programs to develop the knowledge and skills of the nurses and midwives would be beneficial in increasing the quality of service
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信