佩尔·彼得森的《出去偷马:论世界文学与受益逻辑》

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 LITERATURE

CEA CRITIC Pub Date : 2021-05-27 DOI:10.1353/CEA.2021.0003

C. Dell’amico, Isabella Kasselstrand

{"title":"佩尔·彼得森的《出去偷马:论世界文学与受益逻辑》","authors":"C. Dell’amico, Isabella Kasselstrand","doi":"10.1353/CEA.2021.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Complicating the matter of expertise with the world-literature canon is that many works are written for multicultural and transnational readerships. In the past, these works might have been produced at cultural crossroads; today, many authors are broaching transnational issues and assuming broad, transnational readerships. Who, then, is the expert on these texts?","PeriodicalId":41558,"journal":{"name":"CEA CRITIC","volume":"83 1","pages":"18 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/CEA.2021.0003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Per Petterson’s Out Stealing Horses: On World Literature and the Logic of the Beneficiary\",\"authors\":\"C. Dell’amico, Isabella Kasselstrand\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/CEA.2021.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Complicating the matter of expertise with the world-literature canon is that many works are written for multicultural and transnational readerships. In the past, these works might have been produced at cultural crossroads; today, many authors are broaching transnational issues and assuming broad, transnational readerships. Who, then, is the expert on these texts?\",\"PeriodicalId\":41558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CEA CRITIC\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"18 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/CEA.2021.0003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CEA CRITIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/CEA.2021.0003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEA CRITIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/CEA.2021.0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:许多作品是为多元文化和跨国读者而写的，这使世界文学经典的专业知识问题变得复杂。在过去，这些作品可能是在文化的十字路口产生的;今天，许多作者都在探讨跨国问题，并拥有广泛的跨国读者。那么，谁是这些文本的专家呢?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Per Petterson’s Out Stealing Horses: On World Literature and the Logic of the Beneficiary

Abstract:Complicating the matter of expertise with the world-literature canon is that many works are written for multicultural and transnational readerships. In the past, these works might have been produced at cultural crossroads; today, many authors are broaching transnational issues and assuming broad, transnational readerships. Who, then, is the expert on these texts?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CEA CRITIC LITERATURE-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量