绩效工资能提高工作效率吗?医学鉴定部门提供的证据

IF 4.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Oliver Unger , Andrea Szczesny , Martin Holderried
{"title":"绩效工资能提高工作效率吗?医学鉴定部门提供的证据","authors":"Oliver Unger ,&nbsp;Andrea Szczesny ,&nbsp;Martin Holderried","doi":"10.1016/j.mar.2019.100649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using unique data from a medical typing unit (2011–2014), this paper empirically explores the influence of performance pay on employee productivity in a risk-less low incentive intensity environment. We analyze a routine task performed by lower-level employees. We analyze a setting with strong sectoral agreements and thus a clear (and comparatively high) basic wage level set by the general collective bargaining agreement. We find that despite the risk-less design and low incentive intensity of the setting, switching employees from fixed wages to partially performance-based compensation (PPBC) significantly increases the number of typed pages by 9.53%. Over a one-year period, this rate of increase translates into approximately one additional month of output at a fraction of the usual cost. We also find that these results do not disappear over time. In contrast, the observed gains split into an initial increase in productivity following the switch to PPBC (+3.25%) and additional gains while an employee remains on PPBC. Therefore, we assume that a type of learning begins once an employee switches to PPBC and that this learning is the most pronounced during the first months following the change in compensation. Furthermore, we find no evidence of potentially misplaced incentives in the selection of tasks by the employees (i.e., cherry picking) and no indications of reduced quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51429,"journal":{"name":"Management Accounting Research","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100649"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mar.2019.100649","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does performance pay increase productivity? Evidence from a medical typing unit\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Unger ,&nbsp;Andrea Szczesny ,&nbsp;Martin Holderried\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mar.2019.100649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Using unique data from a medical typing unit (2011–2014), this paper empirically explores the influence of performance pay on employee productivity in a risk-less low incentive intensity environment. We analyze a routine task performed by lower-level employees. We analyze a setting with strong sectoral agreements and thus a clear (and comparatively high) basic wage level set by the general collective bargaining agreement. We find that despite the risk-less design and low incentive intensity of the setting, switching employees from fixed wages to partially performance-based compensation (PPBC) significantly increases the number of typed pages by 9.53%. Over a one-year period, this rate of increase translates into approximately one additional month of output at a fraction of the usual cost. We also find that these results do not disappear over time. In contrast, the observed gains split into an initial increase in productivity following the switch to PPBC (+3.25%) and additional gains while an employee remains on PPBC. Therefore, we assume that a type of learning begins once an employee switches to PPBC and that this learning is the most pronounced during the first months following the change in compensation. Furthermore, we find no evidence of potentially misplaced incentives in the selection of tasks by the employees (i.e., cherry picking) and no indications of reduced quality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mar.2019.100649\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044500519300460\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044500519300460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文利用某医疗类型单位(2011-2014)的独特数据,实证探讨了无风险低激励强度环境下绩效薪酬对员工生产率的影响。我们分析一项由低级别员工执行的日常任务。我们分析了一个具有强有力的部门协议的环境,因此,一般集体谈判协议规定了一个明确的(相对较高的)基本工资水平。我们发现,尽管设置了无风险设计和低激励强度,但将员工从固定工资转换为部分绩效薪酬(PPBC)显著增加了9.53%的打字页数。在一年的时间里,这一增长速度相当于以通常成本的一小部分增加大约一个月的产出。我们还发现,这些结果不会随着时间的推移而消失。相比之下,观察到的收益分为切换到PPBC后生产力的初始增长(+3.25%)和员工继续使用PPBC时的额外收益。因此,我们假设一旦员工转到PPBC,一种类型的学习就开始了,并且这种学习在薪酬变化后的头几个月最为明显。此外,我们发现没有证据表明员工在选择任务时存在潜在的错位激励(即挑选樱桃),也没有迹象表明工作质量下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does performance pay increase productivity? Evidence from a medical typing unit

Using unique data from a medical typing unit (2011–2014), this paper empirically explores the influence of performance pay on employee productivity in a risk-less low incentive intensity environment. We analyze a routine task performed by lower-level employees. We analyze a setting with strong sectoral agreements and thus a clear (and comparatively high) basic wage level set by the general collective bargaining agreement. We find that despite the risk-less design and low incentive intensity of the setting, switching employees from fixed wages to partially performance-based compensation (PPBC) significantly increases the number of typed pages by 9.53%. Over a one-year period, this rate of increase translates into approximately one additional month of output at a fraction of the usual cost. We also find that these results do not disappear over time. In contrast, the observed gains split into an initial increase in productivity following the switch to PPBC (+3.25%) and additional gains while an employee remains on PPBC. Therefore, we assume that a type of learning begins once an employee switches to PPBC and that this learning is the most pronounced during the first months following the change in compensation. Furthermore, we find no evidence of potentially misplaced incentives in the selection of tasks by the employees (i.e., cherry picking) and no indications of reduced quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Management Accounting Research aims to serve as a vehicle for publishing original research in the field of management accounting. Its contributions include case studies, field work, and other empirical research, analytical modelling, scholarly papers, distinguished review articles, comments, and notes. It provides an international forum for the dissemination of research, with papers written by prestigious international authors discussing and analysing management accounting in many different parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信