63 Moons NSEL合并：利益相关者的Boon或Bane

IF 0.1 Q4 BUSINESS

Asian Case Research Journal Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1142/s0218927519500159

Shernaz Bodhanwala

{"title":"63 Moons NSEL合并：利益相关者的Boon或Bane","authors":"Shernaz Bodhanwala","doi":"10.1142/s0218927519500159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, had ordered the mandatory merger of 63 Moons Technologies Limited (63 Moons) with its crisis struck subsidiary company, National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL), the electronic commodity spot exchange of India. However, 63 Moons’ board and promoters did not agree with the forced merger order as they believed that they were not at major fault behind the NSEL payment crisis. The case provides an opportunity to participate in the real-world complex decision-making process which involves the forced merger of two entities that may affect the interest of various stakeholders. The case allows examination of the issues such as related party transactions, internal monitoring and control processes, organizational structure and the regulatory framework which led to the payment crisis.","PeriodicalId":40720,"journal":{"name":"Asian Case Research Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"369-398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"63 Moons-NSEL Merger: A Boon or a Bane for the Stakeholders\",\"authors\":\"Shernaz Bodhanwala\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s0218927519500159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, had ordered the mandatory merger of 63 Moons Technologies Limited (63 Moons) with its crisis struck subsidiary company, National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL), the electronic commodity spot exchange of India. However, 63 Moons’ board and promoters did not agree with the forced merger order as they believed that they were not at major fault behind the NSEL payment crisis. The case provides an opportunity to participate in the real-world complex decision-making process which involves the forced merger of two entities that may affect the interest of various stakeholders. The case allows examination of the issues such as related party transactions, internal monitoring and control processes, organizational structure and the regulatory framework which led to the payment crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Case Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"369-398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Case Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218927519500159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Case Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218927519500159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

印度政府企业事务部已下令将63 Moons Technologies Limited（63 Moons）与其遭受危机打击的子公司印度电子商品现货交易所National Spot Exchange Limited（NSEL）强制合并。然而，63 Moons的董事会和发起人不同意强制合并令，因为他们认为自己在NSEL支付危机背后没有重大过错。该案件提供了一个参与现实世界复杂决策过程的机会，该过程涉及两个实体的强制合并，可能会影响各个利益相关者的利益。该案件允许审查导致支付危机的关联方交易、内部监控流程、组织结构和监管框架等问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

63 Moons-NSEL Merger: A Boon or a Bane for the Stakeholders

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, had ordered the mandatory merger of 63 Moons Technologies Limited (63 Moons) with its crisis struck subsidiary company, National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL), the electronic commodity spot exchange of India. However, 63 Moons’ board and promoters did not agree with the forced merger order as they believed that they were not at major fault behind the NSEL payment crisis. The case provides an opportunity to participate in the real-world complex decision-making process which involves the forced merger of two entities that may affect the interest of various stakeholders. The case allows examination of the issues such as related party transactions, internal monitoring and control processes, organizational structure and the regulatory framework which led to the payment crisis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Asian Case Research Journal BUSINESS-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Asian Case Research Journal"s principal objective is to provide case instructors, whether academics, consultants, or company in-house trainers, a selection of high-quality cases on Asian companies and MNCs operating in Asia-Pacific. These cases, not having been previously published, provide a fresh and topical pool of cases for teaching purposes. The cases are either decisional — that is, requiring some business decision from the reader — or illustrative in nature, such as reasons for a firm"s success. The cases come from various business disciplines including strategic management, marketing, organizational behavior/human resources, operations management, and MIS. All cases have been double blind refereed to ensure quality.