人力资源开发领域的本土研究:来自人力资源开发研究所的思考与贡献呼吁

IF 3.8 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Rajashi Ghosh, S. Nachmias, D. McGuire
{"title":"人力资源开发领域的本土研究:来自人力资源开发研究所的思考与贡献呼吁","authors":"Rajashi Ghosh, S. Nachmias, D. McGuire","doi":"10.1080/13678868.2022.2162675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the most recent editorial published in Volume 21 and Issue 4 of Human Resource Development Review (HRDR), a group of scholars commented on the gap of and scope for Indigenous research in the field of HRD. We at Human Resource Development International (HRDI) share this interest and commitment towards being more inclusive of voices that are presenting alternative and counter narratives to the commonplace ways of theorising and examining phenomenon relevant to HRD. Given that HRD scholarship is still predominantly skewed towards highlighting research conducted in the West, it is a moral imperative for journals in the field of HRD to be intentional in inquiring why we are lacking Indigenous voices and how we can make space for those voices in an equitable manner. Indigenous research has been defined by Li, Sekiguchi, and Zhou (2016) as encompassing ‘the context-sensitive and context-specific approaches to a uniquely local phenomenon, which may have global implications’ (p.584). Thus, an emphasis on the ‘context’ is required to be at the essence of how such research is conceptualised and conducted. With this understanding, HRDI has proactively attempted to make space for contextual understanding of HRD phenomena, constructs, and practices. For instance, in 2022, HRDI has published articles that have an intentional focus on the role that context plays in shaping the constructs being studied. A few such examples are listed here:","PeriodicalId":47369,"journal":{"name":"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL","volume":"26 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous research in HRD: reflections from HRDI & call for contributions\",\"authors\":\"Rajashi Ghosh, S. Nachmias, D. McGuire\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13678868.2022.2162675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the most recent editorial published in Volume 21 and Issue 4 of Human Resource Development Review (HRDR), a group of scholars commented on the gap of and scope for Indigenous research in the field of HRD. We at Human Resource Development International (HRDI) share this interest and commitment towards being more inclusive of voices that are presenting alternative and counter narratives to the commonplace ways of theorising and examining phenomenon relevant to HRD. Given that HRD scholarship is still predominantly skewed towards highlighting research conducted in the West, it is a moral imperative for journals in the field of HRD to be intentional in inquiring why we are lacking Indigenous voices and how we can make space for those voices in an equitable manner. Indigenous research has been defined by Li, Sekiguchi, and Zhou (2016) as encompassing ‘the context-sensitive and context-specific approaches to a uniquely local phenomenon, which may have global implications’ (p.584). Thus, an emphasis on the ‘context’ is required to be at the essence of how such research is conceptualised and conducted. With this understanding, HRDI has proactively attempted to make space for contextual understanding of HRD phenomena, constructs, and practices. For instance, in 2022, HRDI has published articles that have an intentional focus on the role that context plays in shaping the constructs being studied. A few such examples are listed here:\",\"PeriodicalId\":47369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2162675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2162675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在《人力资源开发评论》(HRDR)第21卷第4期最近发表的社论中,一群学者评论了人力资源开发领域土著研究的差距和范围。我们国际人力资源开发公司(HRDI)也有同样的兴趣和承诺,即更包容那些提出不同观点的声音,这些观点不同于对人力资源开发相关现象进行理论和研究的常见方式。鉴于人力资源开发研究仍然主要倾向于强调在西方进行的研究,人力资源开发领域的期刊在道德上有必要有意识地探讨为什么我们缺乏土著的声音,以及我们如何以公平的方式为这些声音创造空间。Li、Sekiguchi和Zhou(2016)将本土研究定义为包含“对可能具有全球影响的独特本地现象的情境敏感和情境特定方法”(第584页)。因此,需要强调“背景”,以了解如何概念化和进行此类研究的本质。有了这样的认识,HRDI积极地尝试为人力资源开发现象、结构和实践的语境理解腾出空间。例如,在2022年,HRDI发表了一些文章,有意将重点放在语境在塑造所研究的构念中所起的作用上。下面列出了一些这样的例子:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indigenous research in HRD: reflections from HRDI & call for contributions
In the most recent editorial published in Volume 21 and Issue 4 of Human Resource Development Review (HRDR), a group of scholars commented on the gap of and scope for Indigenous research in the field of HRD. We at Human Resource Development International (HRDI) share this interest and commitment towards being more inclusive of voices that are presenting alternative and counter narratives to the commonplace ways of theorising and examining phenomenon relevant to HRD. Given that HRD scholarship is still predominantly skewed towards highlighting research conducted in the West, it is a moral imperative for journals in the field of HRD to be intentional in inquiring why we are lacking Indigenous voices and how we can make space for those voices in an equitable manner. Indigenous research has been defined by Li, Sekiguchi, and Zhou (2016) as encompassing ‘the context-sensitive and context-specific approaches to a uniquely local phenomenon, which may have global implications’ (p.584). Thus, an emphasis on the ‘context’ is required to be at the essence of how such research is conceptualised and conducted. With this understanding, HRDI has proactively attempted to make space for contextual understanding of HRD phenomena, constructs, and practices. For instance, in 2022, HRDI has published articles that have an intentional focus on the role that context plays in shaping the constructs being studied. A few such examples are listed here:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Human Resource Development International promotes all aspects of practice and research that explore issues of individual, group and organisational learning and performance. In adopting this perspective Human Resource Development International is committed to questioning the divide between practice and theory; between the practitioner and the academic; and between traditional and experimental methodological approaches. Human Resource Development International is committed to a wide understanding of ''organisation'' - one that extends through self-managed teams, voluntary work, or family businesses to global enterprises and bureaucracies. Human Resource Development International also commits itself to exploring the development of organisations and the life-long learning of people and their collectivity (organisation), their strategy and their policy, from all parts of the world. In this way Human Resource Development International will become a leading forum for debate and exploration of the interdisciplinary field of human resource development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信