{"title":"人力资源开发领域的本土研究:来自人力资源开发研究所的思考与贡献呼吁","authors":"Rajashi Ghosh, S. Nachmias, D. McGuire","doi":"10.1080/13678868.2022.2162675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the most recent editorial published in Volume 21 and Issue 4 of Human Resource Development Review (HRDR), a group of scholars commented on the gap of and scope for Indigenous research in the field of HRD. We at Human Resource Development International (HRDI) share this interest and commitment towards being more inclusive of voices that are presenting alternative and counter narratives to the commonplace ways of theorising and examining phenomenon relevant to HRD. Given that HRD scholarship is still predominantly skewed towards highlighting research conducted in the West, it is a moral imperative for journals in the field of HRD to be intentional in inquiring why we are lacking Indigenous voices and how we can make space for those voices in an equitable manner. Indigenous research has been defined by Li, Sekiguchi, and Zhou (2016) as encompassing ‘the context-sensitive and context-specific approaches to a uniquely local phenomenon, which may have global implications’ (p.584). Thus, an emphasis on the ‘context’ is required to be at the essence of how such research is conceptualised and conducted. With this understanding, HRDI has proactively attempted to make space for contextual understanding of HRD phenomena, constructs, and practices. For instance, in 2022, HRDI has published articles that have an intentional focus on the role that context plays in shaping the constructs being studied. A few such examples are listed here:","PeriodicalId":47369,"journal":{"name":"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL","volume":"26 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous research in HRD: reflections from HRDI & call for contributions\",\"authors\":\"Rajashi Ghosh, S. Nachmias, D. McGuire\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13678868.2022.2162675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the most recent editorial published in Volume 21 and Issue 4 of Human Resource Development Review (HRDR), a group of scholars commented on the gap of and scope for Indigenous research in the field of HRD. We at Human Resource Development International (HRDI) share this interest and commitment towards being more inclusive of voices that are presenting alternative and counter narratives to the commonplace ways of theorising and examining phenomenon relevant to HRD. Given that HRD scholarship is still predominantly skewed towards highlighting research conducted in the West, it is a moral imperative for journals in the field of HRD to be intentional in inquiring why we are lacking Indigenous voices and how we can make space for those voices in an equitable manner. Indigenous research has been defined by Li, Sekiguchi, and Zhou (2016) as encompassing ‘the context-sensitive and context-specific approaches to a uniquely local phenomenon, which may have global implications’ (p.584). Thus, an emphasis on the ‘context’ is required to be at the essence of how such research is conceptualised and conducted. With this understanding, HRDI has proactively attempted to make space for contextual understanding of HRD phenomena, constructs, and practices. For instance, in 2022, HRDI has published articles that have an intentional focus on the role that context plays in shaping the constructs being studied. A few such examples are listed here:\",\"PeriodicalId\":47369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2162675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2162675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Indigenous research in HRD: reflections from HRDI & call for contributions
In the most recent editorial published in Volume 21 and Issue 4 of Human Resource Development Review (HRDR), a group of scholars commented on the gap of and scope for Indigenous research in the field of HRD. We at Human Resource Development International (HRDI) share this interest and commitment towards being more inclusive of voices that are presenting alternative and counter narratives to the commonplace ways of theorising and examining phenomenon relevant to HRD. Given that HRD scholarship is still predominantly skewed towards highlighting research conducted in the West, it is a moral imperative for journals in the field of HRD to be intentional in inquiring why we are lacking Indigenous voices and how we can make space for those voices in an equitable manner. Indigenous research has been defined by Li, Sekiguchi, and Zhou (2016) as encompassing ‘the context-sensitive and context-specific approaches to a uniquely local phenomenon, which may have global implications’ (p.584). Thus, an emphasis on the ‘context’ is required to be at the essence of how such research is conceptualised and conducted. With this understanding, HRDI has proactively attempted to make space for contextual understanding of HRD phenomena, constructs, and practices. For instance, in 2022, HRDI has published articles that have an intentional focus on the role that context plays in shaping the constructs being studied. A few such examples are listed here:
期刊介绍:
Human Resource Development International promotes all aspects of practice and research that explore issues of individual, group and organisational learning and performance. In adopting this perspective Human Resource Development International is committed to questioning the divide between practice and theory; between the practitioner and the academic; and between traditional and experimental methodological approaches. Human Resource Development International is committed to a wide understanding of ''organisation'' - one that extends through self-managed teams, voluntary work, or family businesses to global enterprises and bureaucracies. Human Resource Development International also commits itself to exploring the development of organisations and the life-long learning of people and their collectivity (organisation), their strategy and their policy, from all parts of the world. In this way Human Resource Development International will become a leading forum for debate and exploration of the interdisciplinary field of human resource development.