被送往范地的年轻罪犯的人生历程

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Katherine Roscoe
{"title":"被送往范地的年轻罪犯的人生历程","authors":"Katherine Roscoe","doi":"10.1080/14780038.2022.2148616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"experience, finding only minor change during Georgian period – a more formalised market and a richer variety of lodgers than the cultural stereotypes suggest. Lodging, it is suggested, was ultimately part of the new consumer society of eighteenth-century London–‘an unconstrained capitalist supply-and-demand marketplace’. There is much to enjoy here: the stories of notable landlords, landladies, and lodgers are vivid and told with humour and insight. The available sources have been mined skilfully and good use has been made of contemporary prints and engravings. In some ways, though, this lively survey leaves one wanting more: the avowed exclusion by the author of common lodging houses is to be regretted. Some readers might come away with the erroneous impression that metropolitan lodgers were mostly from the middling and upper stations. In fact, lodging was a common life-cycle experience of the poor. Any discussion of cheap lodgings, might also, arguably, include the eighteenth-century workhouse movement. Their construction presumably did considerable damage to the bottom end of the lodgings market – how many paupers preferred free short-term accommodation in a workhouse? In addition to wanting to hear more about downmarket lodging, one also wondered whether it might have been worth adding a further chapter on what lodgers were not. The focus in this book is on the impact of lodging on the household and family – on the domestic life of the landlord/landlady. Arguably just as important is the somewhat disconnected nature of lodging life: such people were not full parishioners, they did not pay parish taxes, could not vote, and could not serve as parish officers – they were not housekeepers. Lodgers and lodging were part of those urban forces that challenged the sociological urban ‘community’ and diluted a sense of local belonging in towns and cities. This excellent pioneering survey, then, is far from the last word on lodging – but it is a lively and perceptive start.","PeriodicalId":45240,"journal":{"name":"Cultural & Social History","volume":"19 1","pages":"620 - 622"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life Courses of Young Convicts Transported to Van Diemen’s Land\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Roscoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14780038.2022.2148616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"experience, finding only minor change during Georgian period – a more formalised market and a richer variety of lodgers than the cultural stereotypes suggest. Lodging, it is suggested, was ultimately part of the new consumer society of eighteenth-century London–‘an unconstrained capitalist supply-and-demand marketplace’. There is much to enjoy here: the stories of notable landlords, landladies, and lodgers are vivid and told with humour and insight. The available sources have been mined skilfully and good use has been made of contemporary prints and engravings. In some ways, though, this lively survey leaves one wanting more: the avowed exclusion by the author of common lodging houses is to be regretted. Some readers might come away with the erroneous impression that metropolitan lodgers were mostly from the middling and upper stations. In fact, lodging was a common life-cycle experience of the poor. Any discussion of cheap lodgings, might also, arguably, include the eighteenth-century workhouse movement. Their construction presumably did considerable damage to the bottom end of the lodgings market – how many paupers preferred free short-term accommodation in a workhouse? In addition to wanting to hear more about downmarket lodging, one also wondered whether it might have been worth adding a further chapter on what lodgers were not. The focus in this book is on the impact of lodging on the household and family – on the domestic life of the landlord/landlady. Arguably just as important is the somewhat disconnected nature of lodging life: such people were not full parishioners, they did not pay parish taxes, could not vote, and could not serve as parish officers – they were not housekeepers. Lodgers and lodging were part of those urban forces that challenged the sociological urban ‘community’ and diluted a sense of local belonging in towns and cities. This excellent pioneering survey, then, is far from the last word on lodging – but it is a lively and perceptive start.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural & Social History\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"620 - 622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural & Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2022.2148616\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural & Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780038.2022.2148616","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体验,在格鲁吉亚时期只发现了微小的变化——一个比文化刻板印象更正式的市场和更丰富的房客种类。有人认为,住宿最终是18世纪伦敦新消费社会的一部分——一个不受约束的资本主义供求市场。这里有很多值得欣赏的地方:著名房东、女房东和房客的故事生动有趣,充满幽默和洞察力。对现有的来源进行了巧妙的挖掘,并很好地利用了当代版画和版画。然而,在某些方面,这项生动的调查让人想要更多:作者公开表示将普通宿舍排除在外,这令人遗憾。一些读者可能会产生一种错误的印象,认为大都市的房客大多来自中上层车站。事实上,住宿是穷人一生中常见的经历。任何关于廉价住宿的讨论,都可能包括18世纪的济贫院运动。他们的建设可能对住宿市场的低端造成了相当大的损害——有多少穷人更喜欢在济贫院提供免费的短期住宿?除了想了解更多关于低端住宿的信息外,人们还想知道是否值得再增加一章,说明哪些住宿者不是。本书的重点是住宿对家庭和家庭的影响——对房东/女房东的家庭生活的影响。可以说,同样重要的是住宿生活的脱节性质:这些人不是正式的教区居民,他们不缴纳教区税,不能投票,也不能担任教区官员——他们不是管家。寄宿者和寄宿者是挑战社会学城市“社区”的城市力量的一部分,削弱了城镇的地方归属感。因此,这项出色的开创性调查远不是关于住宿的最后决定,但它是一个生动而敏锐的开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Life Courses of Young Convicts Transported to Van Diemen’s Land
experience, finding only minor change during Georgian period – a more formalised market and a richer variety of lodgers than the cultural stereotypes suggest. Lodging, it is suggested, was ultimately part of the new consumer society of eighteenth-century London–‘an unconstrained capitalist supply-and-demand marketplace’. There is much to enjoy here: the stories of notable landlords, landladies, and lodgers are vivid and told with humour and insight. The available sources have been mined skilfully and good use has been made of contemporary prints and engravings. In some ways, though, this lively survey leaves one wanting more: the avowed exclusion by the author of common lodging houses is to be regretted. Some readers might come away with the erroneous impression that metropolitan lodgers were mostly from the middling and upper stations. In fact, lodging was a common life-cycle experience of the poor. Any discussion of cheap lodgings, might also, arguably, include the eighteenth-century workhouse movement. Their construction presumably did considerable damage to the bottom end of the lodgings market – how many paupers preferred free short-term accommodation in a workhouse? In addition to wanting to hear more about downmarket lodging, one also wondered whether it might have been worth adding a further chapter on what lodgers were not. The focus in this book is on the impact of lodging on the household and family – on the domestic life of the landlord/landlady. Arguably just as important is the somewhat disconnected nature of lodging life: such people were not full parishioners, they did not pay parish taxes, could not vote, and could not serve as parish officers – they were not housekeepers. Lodgers and lodging were part of those urban forces that challenged the sociological urban ‘community’ and diluted a sense of local belonging in towns and cities. This excellent pioneering survey, then, is far from the last word on lodging – but it is a lively and perceptive start.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Cultural & Social History is published on behalf of the Social History Society (SHS). Members receive the journal as part of their membership package. To join the Society, please download an application form on the Society"s website and follow the instructions provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信