治疗阿尔茨海默病的Lecanemab:新的希望还是另一个虚假的曙光?

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Mark Dashwood, T. Kuruvilla
{"title":"治疗阿尔茨海默病的Lecanemab:新的希望还是另一个虚假的曙光?","authors":"Mark Dashwood, T. Kuruvilla","doi":"10.1002/pnp.772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"wchh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com 4 I Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry I Vol. 27 Iss. 1 2023 Since the development of the ‘amyloid hypothesis1–3 there has been considerable effort in developing treatments that target the build-up of amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques in the brain thought to be responsible for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Over the past 15 years, much of this research has focussed on developing monoclonal antibodies as potential disease modifying treatments (DMTs) targeting Aβ.4 However, a number of trials of similar molecules did not meet the primary endpoint or were pulled midway after interim futility analyses,5–7 leading to questions about whether this was the right approach given the complex and multifactorial pathogenesis of AD. An exception to this was the USA’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accelerated approval for aducanumab in June 2021, which we reviewed here previously.8 Accelerated approval was designed to allow for earlier authorisation of drugs that are intended to treat serious conditions where the initial evidence showed the potential to address an unmet clinical need. There is still a requirement for phase 4 confirmatory trials, which in the case of aducanumab are ongoing. The decision to grant accelerated approval for aducanumab was controversial due to doubts regarding clinical efficacy – that it was based on post hoc analysis of data, and also safety concerns. The decision led to several members of the FDA advisory team resigning in protest.9","PeriodicalId":43913,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease: new hope or another false dawn?\",\"authors\":\"Mark Dashwood, T. Kuruvilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pnp.772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"wchh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com 4 I Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry I Vol. 27 Iss. 1 2023 Since the development of the ‘amyloid hypothesis1–3 there has been considerable effort in developing treatments that target the build-up of amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques in the brain thought to be responsible for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Over the past 15 years, much of this research has focussed on developing monoclonal antibodies as potential disease modifying treatments (DMTs) targeting Aβ.4 However, a number of trials of similar molecules did not meet the primary endpoint or were pulled midway after interim futility analyses,5–7 leading to questions about whether this was the right approach given the complex and multifactorial pathogenesis of AD. An exception to this was the USA’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accelerated approval for aducanumab in June 2021, which we reviewed here previously.8 Accelerated approval was designed to allow for earlier authorisation of drugs that are intended to treat serious conditions where the initial evidence showed the potential to address an unmet clinical need. There is still a requirement for phase 4 confirmatory trials, which in the case of aducanumab are ongoing. The decision to grant accelerated approval for aducanumab was controversial due to doubts regarding clinical efficacy – that it was based on post hoc analysis of data, and also safety concerns. The decision led to several members of the FDA advisory team resigning in protest.9\",\"PeriodicalId\":43913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pnp.772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pnp.772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自“淀粉样蛋白假说”提出以来,人们在开发针对大脑中β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)斑块积聚的治疗方法方面付出了相当大的努力。β淀粉样蛋白被认为是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的罪魁祸首。在过去的15年里,大部分研究都集中在开发针对a β 0.4的单克隆抗体作为潜在的疾病修饰治疗(DMTs)然而,许多类似分子的试验没有达到主要终点,或者在中期无效分析后中途被取消,5-7导致人们质疑,考虑到AD的复杂和多因素发病机制,这是否是正确的方法。一个例外是美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)于2021年6月加速批准aducanumab,我们之前在这里进行了审查加速批准旨在允许早期批准旨在治疗严重疾病的药物,其中初步证据显示可能解决未满足的临床需求。对于aducanumab,仍需要进行4期验证性试验。加速批准aducanumab的决定是有争议的,因为对临床疗效的怀疑——这是基于对数据的事后分析,还有安全性问题。这一决定导致FDA顾问团队的几名成员辞职以示抗议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lecanemab for Alzheimer's disease: new hope or another false dawn?
wchh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com 4 I Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry I Vol. 27 Iss. 1 2023 Since the development of the ‘amyloid hypothesis1–3 there has been considerable effort in developing treatments that target the build-up of amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques in the brain thought to be responsible for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Over the past 15 years, much of this research has focussed on developing monoclonal antibodies as potential disease modifying treatments (DMTs) targeting Aβ.4 However, a number of trials of similar molecules did not meet the primary endpoint or were pulled midway after interim futility analyses,5–7 leading to questions about whether this was the right approach given the complex and multifactorial pathogenesis of AD. An exception to this was the USA’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accelerated approval for aducanumab in June 2021, which we reviewed here previously.8 Accelerated approval was designed to allow for earlier authorisation of drugs that are intended to treat serious conditions where the initial evidence showed the potential to address an unmet clinical need. There is still a requirement for phase 4 confirmatory trials, which in the case of aducanumab are ongoing. The decision to grant accelerated approval for aducanumab was controversial due to doubts regarding clinical efficacy – that it was based on post hoc analysis of data, and also safety concerns. The decision led to several members of the FDA advisory team resigning in protest.9
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry is published nine times a year, and is a journal for specialists in secondary care, GPs with an interest in neurology and psychiatry, community psychiatric nurses and other specialist healthcare professionals. Articles cover management, news updates and opinion in all areas of neurology and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信