加拿大影响评估法案与交叉分析:过度紧张,激烈抵制,缺乏理解

IF 1.1 4区 管理学 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Susan M. Manning, Leah Levac
{"title":"加拿大影响评估法案与交叉分析:过度紧张,激烈抵制,缺乏理解","authors":"Susan M. Manning,&nbsp;Leah Levac","doi":"10.1111/capa.12458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Canada's newly adopted Impact Assessment Act requires gender-based analysis plus (GBA+)—a type of intersectionality mainstreaming—as part of assessing the impacts of resource projects. This explicit inclusion of a GBA+ requirement in legislation for the first time represents an important advance in Canada's commitments to mainstreaming, and one that offers an opportunity to examine how interested policy actors both enable and challenge mainstreaming commitments in the legislative sphere. We consider what the compound problem of invisibility and resistance in the legislative process means for ongoing efforts to advance intersectional policymaking and strengthen mainstreaming in Canada and other western democracies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","volume":"65 2","pages":"242-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/capa.12458","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Canadian Impact Assessment Act and intersectional analysis: Exaggerated tensions, fierce resistance, little understanding\",\"authors\":\"Susan M. Manning,&nbsp;Leah Levac\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/capa.12458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Canada's newly adopted Impact Assessment Act requires gender-based analysis plus (GBA+)—a type of intersectionality mainstreaming—as part of assessing the impacts of resource projects. This explicit inclusion of a GBA+ requirement in legislation for the first time represents an important advance in Canada's commitments to mainstreaming, and one that offers an opportunity to examine how interested policy actors both enable and challenge mainstreaming commitments in the legislative sphere. We consider what the compound problem of invisibility and resistance in the legislative process means for ongoing efforts to advance intersectional policymaking and strengthen mainstreaming in Canada and other western democracies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada\",\"volume\":\"65 2\",\"pages\":\"242-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/capa.12458\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.12458\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.12458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加拿大新通过的《影响评估法》要求将基于性别的分析加(GBA+)——一种交叉性主流化——作为评估资源项目影响的一部分。这是加拿大首次在立法中明确纳入“大湾区+”要求,这是加拿大在实现主流化承诺方面取得的重要进展,也为研究相关政策行为体如何在立法领域实现和挑战主流化承诺提供了机会。我们考虑立法过程中不可见和阻力的复合问题对加拿大和其他西方民主国家推进交叉决策和加强主流化的持续努力意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Canadian Impact Assessment Act and intersectional analysis: Exaggerated tensions, fierce resistance, little understanding

Canada's newly adopted Impact Assessment Act requires gender-based analysis plus (GBA+)—a type of intersectionality mainstreaming—as part of assessing the impacts of resource projects. This explicit inclusion of a GBA+ requirement in legislation for the first time represents an important advance in Canada's commitments to mainstreaming, and one that offers an opportunity to examine how interested policy actors both enable and challenge mainstreaming commitments in the legislative sphere. We consider what the compound problem of invisibility and resistance in the legislative process means for ongoing efforts to advance intersectional policymaking and strengthen mainstreaming in Canada and other western democracies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada is the refereed scholarly publication of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC). It covers executive, legislative, judicial and quasi-judicial functions at all three levels of Canadian government. Published quarterly, the journal focuses mainly on Canadian issues but also welcomes manuscripts which compare Canadian public sector institutions and practices with those in other countries or examine issues in other countries or international organizations which are of interest to the public administration community in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信