快速卡试验与酶联免疫吸附法检测某三甲医院乙型肝炎表面抗原的比较评价

Saheli Bhadra, S. Mohan, Tarana Sarwat, NG Gopeshwor, Sachin Sharma, D. Kakru
{"title":"快速卡试验与酶联免疫吸附法检测某三甲医院乙型肝炎表面抗原的比较评价","authors":"Saheli Bhadra, S. Mohan, Tarana Sarwat, NG Gopeshwor, Sachin Sharma, D. Kakru","doi":"10.20428/yjms.v17i1.2122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the leading causes of death in developing countries. The most importantmarker for HBV diagnosis is detection of Hepatitis B surface antigen in blood.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the analytical sensitivity of a rapid card test in comparison to Enzyme-LinkedImmunosorbent Assay (ELISA) which is considered a Gold Standard technique for the detection of HBsAg in blood samplesreceived for HBsAg test in serology section of Microbiology Department, Central Laboratory, Sharda Hospital.Methods: Cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Department of Microbiology, School of Medical Sciences &Research for a period of 12 months from 1st November 2020 to 31st October 2021. The two different brands by which multipleparameters were analyzed were HEPACARD and Erba Lisa SEN HBsAg.Results: A total of 13939 blood samples were received for HBsAg diagnosis. For the study purpose, from the total of 13939samples, 386 were randomly selected to be included in the study with 193 positive samples and 193 negative samples. Thesensitivity and specificity of Rapid card were 95.83% and 100% respectively. The Positive predictive value and Negativepredictive value of Rapid card were 100% and 95.65% respectively for HBsAg detection.Conclusion: It can be concluded that, an ideal rapid test is a boon in time-saving situations. Since HBsAg screening by a rapidtest is easier, cost effective, time saving can be easily performed by any trained health care worker at any time of need. Hence,HBsAg screening can be preferable done by a Rapid card test followed by a supplemental ELISA and Polymerase chain reactionfor further confirmation. Good sensitivity and specificity of Immuno-chromatography test (ICT) for early detection of HBsAgwas observed.","PeriodicalId":32479,"journal":{"name":"Yemeni Journal for Medical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Rapid Card Test And Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay For The Detection Of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen In A Tertiary Care Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Saheli Bhadra, S. Mohan, Tarana Sarwat, NG Gopeshwor, Sachin Sharma, D. Kakru\",\"doi\":\"10.20428/yjms.v17i1.2122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the leading causes of death in developing countries. The most importantmarker for HBV diagnosis is detection of Hepatitis B surface antigen in blood.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the analytical sensitivity of a rapid card test in comparison to Enzyme-LinkedImmunosorbent Assay (ELISA) which is considered a Gold Standard technique for the detection of HBsAg in blood samplesreceived for HBsAg test in serology section of Microbiology Department, Central Laboratory, Sharda Hospital.Methods: Cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Department of Microbiology, School of Medical Sciences &Research for a period of 12 months from 1st November 2020 to 31st October 2021. The two different brands by which multipleparameters were analyzed were HEPACARD and Erba Lisa SEN HBsAg.Results: A total of 13939 blood samples were received for HBsAg diagnosis. For the study purpose, from the total of 13939samples, 386 were randomly selected to be included in the study with 193 positive samples and 193 negative samples. Thesensitivity and specificity of Rapid card were 95.83% and 100% respectively. The Positive predictive value and Negativepredictive value of Rapid card were 100% and 95.65% respectively for HBsAg detection.Conclusion: It can be concluded that, an ideal rapid test is a boon in time-saving situations. Since HBsAg screening by a rapidtest is easier, cost effective, time saving can be easily performed by any trained health care worker at any time of need. Hence,HBsAg screening can be preferable done by a Rapid card test followed by a supplemental ELISA and Polymerase chain reactionfor further confirmation. Good sensitivity and specificity of Immuno-chromatography test (ICT) for early detection of HBsAgwas observed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yemeni Journal for Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yemeni Journal for Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20428/yjms.v17i1.2122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yemeni Journal for Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20428/yjms.v17i1.2122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染是发展中国家死亡的主要原因之一。HBV诊断最重要的标志是检测血液中的乙肝表面抗原。目的:本研究的目的是比较快速卡试验与酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)的分析灵敏度,ELISA被认为是检测血液样本中HBsAg的金标准技术,沙尔达医院。方法:从2020年11月1日至2021年10月31日,在医学科学与研究院微生物系进行了为期12个月的横断面观察性研究。结果:共采集13939份血液样本进行HBsAg诊断。出于研究目的,从13939份样本中随机选择386份纳入研究,其中193份为阳性样本,193份为阴性样本。快速卡的敏感性和特异性分别为95.83%和100%。快速卡对HBsAg检测的阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为95.65%。结论:可以得出结论,在节省时间的情况下,理想的快速检测是一个福音。由于快速检测HBsAg筛查更容易,成本效益高,任何受过培训的医护人员都可以在任何需要的时候轻松进行,从而节省时间。因此,HBsAg筛查可以优选通过快速卡测试,然后补充ELISA和聚合酶链式反应进行进一步确认。免疫色谱法早期检测HBsAg具有良好的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of Rapid Card Test And Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay For The Detection Of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen In A Tertiary Care Hospital
Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the leading causes of death in developing countries. The most importantmarker for HBV diagnosis is detection of Hepatitis B surface antigen in blood.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the analytical sensitivity of a rapid card test in comparison to Enzyme-LinkedImmunosorbent Assay (ELISA) which is considered a Gold Standard technique for the detection of HBsAg in blood samplesreceived for HBsAg test in serology section of Microbiology Department, Central Laboratory, Sharda Hospital.Methods: Cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Department of Microbiology, School of Medical Sciences &Research for a period of 12 months from 1st November 2020 to 31st October 2021. The two different brands by which multipleparameters were analyzed were HEPACARD and Erba Lisa SEN HBsAg.Results: A total of 13939 blood samples were received for HBsAg diagnosis. For the study purpose, from the total of 13939samples, 386 were randomly selected to be included in the study with 193 positive samples and 193 negative samples. Thesensitivity and specificity of Rapid card were 95.83% and 100% respectively. The Positive predictive value and Negativepredictive value of Rapid card were 100% and 95.65% respectively for HBsAg detection.Conclusion: It can be concluded that, an ideal rapid test is a boon in time-saving situations. Since HBsAg screening by a rapidtest is easier, cost effective, time saving can be easily performed by any trained health care worker at any time of need. Hence,HBsAg screening can be preferable done by a Rapid card test followed by a supplemental ELISA and Polymerase chain reactionfor further confirmation. Good sensitivity and specificity of Immuno-chromatography test (ICT) for early detection of HBsAgwas observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信