金刚烷胺和达法普定改善多发性硬化症患者疲劳的有效性:一项随机、双盲临床试验

IF 0.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yasaman Sadeqi, Seyed Mohammad Baghbanian, Aliyeh Bazi, Monireh Ghazaeian, Sahar Fallah
{"title":"金刚烷胺和达法普定改善多发性硬化症患者疲劳的有效性:一项随机、双盲临床试验","authors":"Yasaman Sadeqi, Seyed Mohammad Baghbanian, Aliyeh Bazi, Monireh Ghazaeian, Sahar Fallah","doi":"10.18502/cjn.v21i4.11717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Fatigue is a common complication associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of dalfampridine and amantadine on fatigue in patients with MS. <b>Methods:</b> This was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial on patients with MS. The recruited patients were adults (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed with MS; their Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was between 0.0 and 5.5, and their fatigue was confirmed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). They were randomly assigned to the amantadine (100 mg twice daily) and dalfampridine (10 mg twice daily) for eight weeks. The primary outcome was the improvement of fatigue score, and the secondary outcome was assessment of quality of life by the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and any reported side effects. <b>Results:</b> A total of 69 patients were recruited, and 54 of them were analyzed. The mean MFIS significantly improved in both groups after one and two months compared to baseline: amantadine: first month: 40.63 ± 14.35 (P = 0.040), second month: 36.56 ± 17.12 (P = 0.010); dalfampridine: first month: 38.29 ± 15.23 (P = 0.001), second month: 34.26 ± 18.30 (P = 0.001). However, the amount of changes from baseline was not significantly different (amantadine, P = 0.090; dalfampridine, P = 0.130). The amount of changes in quality of life showed no significant improvement (P = 0.210). <b>Conclusion:</b> The results showed that dalfampridine was not different with amantadine in improving fatigue in patients with MS; besides, it showed an acceptable safety profile. Therefore, it can be considered as a possible beneficial therapeutic agent in MS fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":40077,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Neurology","volume":"21 1","pages":"211-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of amantadine and dalfampridine in improving fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yasaman Sadeqi, Seyed Mohammad Baghbanian, Aliyeh Bazi, Monireh Ghazaeian, Sahar Fallah\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/cjn.v21i4.11717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Fatigue is a common complication associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of dalfampridine and amantadine on fatigue in patients with MS. <b>Methods:</b> This was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial on patients with MS. The recruited patients were adults (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed with MS; their Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was between 0.0 and 5.5, and their fatigue was confirmed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). They were randomly assigned to the amantadine (100 mg twice daily) and dalfampridine (10 mg twice daily) for eight weeks. The primary outcome was the improvement of fatigue score, and the secondary outcome was assessment of quality of life by the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and any reported side effects. <b>Results:</b> A total of 69 patients were recruited, and 54 of them were analyzed. The mean MFIS significantly improved in both groups after one and two months compared to baseline: amantadine: first month: 40.63 ± 14.35 (P = 0.040), second month: 36.56 ± 17.12 (P = 0.010); dalfampridine: first month: 38.29 ± 15.23 (P = 0.001), second month: 34.26 ± 18.30 (P = 0.001). However, the amount of changes from baseline was not significantly different (amantadine, P = 0.090; dalfampridine, P = 0.130). The amount of changes in quality of life showed no significant improvement (P = 0.210). <b>Conclusion:</b> The results showed that dalfampridine was not different with amantadine in improving fatigue in patients with MS; besides, it showed an acceptable safety profile. Therefore, it can be considered as a possible beneficial therapeutic agent in MS fatigue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"211-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10189202/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v21i4.11717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v21i4.11717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疲劳是多发性硬化症的常见并发症。本研究的目的是评估达尔法姆吡啶和金刚烷胺对MS患者疲劳的影响。方法:这是一项针对MS患者的随机、双盲临床试验。招募的患者为诊断为MS的成人(≥18岁);他们的扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)在0.0到5.5之间,并且他们的疲劳通过改进的疲劳影响量表(MFIS)得到证实。他们被随机分配给金刚烷胺(100 mg,每日两次)和达法普定(10 mg,每日二次),为期八周。主要结果是疲劳评分的改善,次要结果是通过短期健康调查(SF-36)评估生活质量和任何报告的副作用。结果:共招募了69名患者,并对其中54名患者进行了分析。与基线相比,两组的平均MFIS在一个月和两个月后均显著改善:金刚烷胺:第一个月:40.63±14.35(P=0.040),第二个月:36.56±17.12(P=0.010);dalfampridine:第一个月为38.29±15.23(P=0.001),与基线相比变化量无显著性差异(金刚烷胺,P=0.090;达法普定,P=0.130),生活质量变化量无明显改善(P=0.210);此外,它显示出可接受的安全状况。因此,它可以被认为是MS疲劳的一种可能的有益治疗剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effectiveness of amantadine and dalfampridine in improving fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.

Background: Fatigue is a common complication associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of dalfampridine and amantadine on fatigue in patients with MS. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial on patients with MS. The recruited patients were adults (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed with MS; their Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was between 0.0 and 5.5, and their fatigue was confirmed by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). They were randomly assigned to the amantadine (100 mg twice daily) and dalfampridine (10 mg twice daily) for eight weeks. The primary outcome was the improvement of fatigue score, and the secondary outcome was assessment of quality of life by the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and any reported side effects. Results: A total of 69 patients were recruited, and 54 of them were analyzed. The mean MFIS significantly improved in both groups after one and two months compared to baseline: amantadine: first month: 40.63 ± 14.35 (P = 0.040), second month: 36.56 ± 17.12 (P = 0.010); dalfampridine: first month: 38.29 ± 15.23 (P = 0.001), second month: 34.26 ± 18.30 (P = 0.001). However, the amount of changes from baseline was not significantly different (amantadine, P = 0.090; dalfampridine, P = 0.130). The amount of changes in quality of life showed no significant improvement (P = 0.210). Conclusion: The results showed that dalfampridine was not different with amantadine in improving fatigue in patients with MS; besides, it showed an acceptable safety profile. Therefore, it can be considered as a possible beneficial therapeutic agent in MS fatigue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Journal of Neurology
Current Journal of Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信