偏头痛患者广泛性焦虑障碍的快速筛查

IF 0.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Fatemeh Veisy, Hojjatollah Farahani, Mansoureh Togha, Banafsheh Gharaee, Leila Janani, Asma Aghebati
{"title":"偏头痛患者广泛性焦虑障碍的快速筛查","authors":"Fatemeh Veisy, Hojjatollah Farahani, Mansoureh Togha, Banafsheh Gharaee, Leila Janani, Asma Aghebati","doi":"10.18502/cjn.v20i2.6746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) often remains undiagnosed in patients with migraine, while comorbidity of GAD with migraine is associated with increased dysfunction and risk of chronic migraine. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7-item (GAD-7) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 2-item (GAD-2) are the commonly employed screening measures for generalized anxiety symptoms in different patient groups. The present study aimed to evaluate psychometric properties of the Persian version of GAD-7 and GAD-2 in migraine. <b>Methods:</b> In this cross-sectional study, patients were diagnosed with migraine headaches according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3<sup>rd</sup> edition (ICHD-3); then they participated in the psychiatric diagnostic interview, and filled out GAD-7, GAD-2, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQv2.1). The psychometric properties of GAD-7 and GAD-2 were examined using SPSS and LISREL. <b>Results:</b> Final samples were 186 patients with migraine that 83 patients received a diagnosis of GAD. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the one-factor model of GAD-7 fit the data well. Internal consistency, test-retest, and Guttman split-half reliability of GAD-7 and GAD-2 were good. Significant correlation results, average variance extracted (AVE), and composite reliability (CR) supported the construct validity of the GAD-7. A score of ≥ 10 in GAD-7 and ≥ 3 in GAD-2 achieved satisfactory sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) (GAD-7: 92%, 90%, 88%, and 93%, respectively; GAD-2: 79%, 88%, 71%, and 91%, respectively). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings supported GAD-7 and GAD-2 for assessing GAD in patients with migraine. It seems that GAD-7 and GAD-2 accurately diagnosed GAD in this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":40077,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743176/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid screening for generalized anxiety disorder in patients with migraine.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Veisy, Hojjatollah Farahani, Mansoureh Togha, Banafsheh Gharaee, Leila Janani, Asma Aghebati\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/cjn.v20i2.6746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) often remains undiagnosed in patients with migraine, while comorbidity of GAD with migraine is associated with increased dysfunction and risk of chronic migraine. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7-item (GAD-7) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 2-item (GAD-2) are the commonly employed screening measures for generalized anxiety symptoms in different patient groups. The present study aimed to evaluate psychometric properties of the Persian version of GAD-7 and GAD-2 in migraine. <b>Methods:</b> In this cross-sectional study, patients were diagnosed with migraine headaches according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3<sup>rd</sup> edition (ICHD-3); then they participated in the psychiatric diagnostic interview, and filled out GAD-7, GAD-2, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQv2.1). The psychometric properties of GAD-7 and GAD-2 were examined using SPSS and LISREL. <b>Results:</b> Final samples were 186 patients with migraine that 83 patients received a diagnosis of GAD. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the one-factor model of GAD-7 fit the data well. Internal consistency, test-retest, and Guttman split-half reliability of GAD-7 and GAD-2 were good. Significant correlation results, average variance extracted (AVE), and composite reliability (CR) supported the construct validity of the GAD-7. A score of ≥ 10 in GAD-7 and ≥ 3 in GAD-2 achieved satisfactory sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) (GAD-7: 92%, 90%, 88%, and 93%, respectively; GAD-2: 79%, 88%, 71%, and 91%, respectively). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings supported GAD-7 and GAD-2 for assessing GAD in patients with migraine. It seems that GAD-7 and GAD-2 accurately diagnosed GAD in this group of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v20i2.6746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v20i2.6746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)通常在偏头痛患者中未被诊断,而广泛性焦虑障碍与偏头痛的共病与功能障碍增加和慢性偏头痛的风险相关。广泛性焦虑障碍量表7项(GAD-7)和广泛性焦虑障碍量表2项(GAD-2)是不同患者群体中常用的广泛性焦虑症状筛查指标。本研究旨在评估偏头痛患者的波斯版GAD-7和GAD-2的心理测量特性。方法:在本横断面研究中,根据国际头痛疾病分类第3版(ICHD-3)诊断为偏头痛的患者;然后参加精神病学诊断访谈,填写GAD-7、GAD-2、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)、头痛影响测试-6 (HIT-6)和偏头痛特异性生活质量问卷2.1版(MSQv2.1)。采用SPSS和LISREL对GAD-7和GAD-2的心理测量特性进行检验。结果:最终样本为186例偏头痛患者,其中83例被诊断为广泛性焦虑症。验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,GAD-7的单因素模型与数据拟合良好。GAD-7和GAD-2的内部一致性、重测信度和Guttman分半信度均较好。显著相关结果、平均方差提取(AVE)和复合信度(CR)支持GAD-7的结构效度。GAD-7≥10分和GAD-2≥3分的患者获得满意的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV) (GAD-7分别为92%、90%、88%和93%;GAD-2:分别为79%、88%、71%和91%)。结论:我们的研究结果支持GAD-7和GAD-2对偏头痛患者GAD的评估。似乎GAD-7和GAD-2能准确诊断本组患者的广泛性焦虑症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rapid screening for generalized anxiety disorder in patients with migraine.

Background: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) often remains undiagnosed in patients with migraine, while comorbidity of GAD with migraine is associated with increased dysfunction and risk of chronic migraine. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7-item (GAD-7) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 2-item (GAD-2) are the commonly employed screening measures for generalized anxiety symptoms in different patient groups. The present study aimed to evaluate psychometric properties of the Persian version of GAD-7 and GAD-2 in migraine. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients were diagnosed with migraine headaches according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3); then they participated in the psychiatric diagnostic interview, and filled out GAD-7, GAD-2, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQv2.1). The psychometric properties of GAD-7 and GAD-2 were examined using SPSS and LISREL. Results: Final samples were 186 patients with migraine that 83 patients received a diagnosis of GAD. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the one-factor model of GAD-7 fit the data well. Internal consistency, test-retest, and Guttman split-half reliability of GAD-7 and GAD-2 were good. Significant correlation results, average variance extracted (AVE), and composite reliability (CR) supported the construct validity of the GAD-7. A score of ≥ 10 in GAD-7 and ≥ 3 in GAD-2 achieved satisfactory sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) (GAD-7: 92%, 90%, 88%, and 93%, respectively; GAD-2: 79%, 88%, 71%, and 91%, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings supported GAD-7 and GAD-2 for assessing GAD in patients with migraine. It seems that GAD-7 and GAD-2 accurately diagnosed GAD in this group of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Journal of Neurology
Current Journal of Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信