组织学校进行协作学习:学校领导与教师参与协作

IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Patrick
{"title":"组织学校进行协作学习:学校领导与教师参与协作","authors":"S. Patrick","doi":"10.1177/0013161X221107628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Collaborative workgroups can be particularly fruitful sites for teachers to learn and improve. Prior research has illustrated how teachers' engagement in collaboration differs across school contexts. However, this research offers little guidance for leaders hoping to encourage collaborative learning among teachers in their school. Research Methods: Using survey and administrative data from teachers across Tennessee, this study examines the extent to which teachers in a large statewide sample (N = 9889) report engaging in collaborative learning opportunities and how these opportunities are distributed across and within schools. Using a series of multilevel models, I examine whether organizational conditions of schools influenced by school leaders are associated with the teacher-reported frequency and helpfulness of collaborative learning opportunities. Findings: I find significant variation in frequency across context (e.g., school level, geographic context, district size) and find that collaborative planning time consistently predicts how often teachers collaborate. Once accounting for frequency, teachers rate their collaboration as more helpful in schools with higher ratings of the professional climate/leadership and lower ratings of administrative oversight over collaboration. These relationships vary somewhat across contexts, with stronger negative relationships between oversight and helpfulness in schools with weak professional climates and large schools. Implications: Leaders should consider how to structure their schedules to allow for regular collaboration during the school day but should be cautious in mandating how teachers spend large portions of this collaborative time without shared decision-making with teachers.","PeriodicalId":48091,"journal":{"name":"Educational Administration Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizing Schools for Collaborative Learning: School Leadership and Teachers’ Engagement in Collaboration\",\"authors\":\"S. Patrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0013161X221107628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Collaborative workgroups can be particularly fruitful sites for teachers to learn and improve. Prior research has illustrated how teachers' engagement in collaboration differs across school contexts. However, this research offers little guidance for leaders hoping to encourage collaborative learning among teachers in their school. Research Methods: Using survey and administrative data from teachers across Tennessee, this study examines the extent to which teachers in a large statewide sample (N = 9889) report engaging in collaborative learning opportunities and how these opportunities are distributed across and within schools. Using a series of multilevel models, I examine whether organizational conditions of schools influenced by school leaders are associated with the teacher-reported frequency and helpfulness of collaborative learning opportunities. Findings: I find significant variation in frequency across context (e.g., school level, geographic context, district size) and find that collaborative planning time consistently predicts how often teachers collaborate. Once accounting for frequency, teachers rate their collaboration as more helpful in schools with higher ratings of the professional climate/leadership and lower ratings of administrative oversight over collaboration. These relationships vary somewhat across contexts, with stronger negative relationships between oversight and helpfulness in schools with weak professional climates and large schools. Implications: Leaders should consider how to structure their schedules to allow for regular collaboration during the school day but should be cautious in mandating how teachers spend large portions of this collaborative time without shared decision-making with teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Administration Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Administration Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X221107628\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Administration Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X221107628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:协作工作小组是教师学习和提高的特别有效的场所。先前的研究已经说明了教师在合作中的参与在不同的学校环境中是如何不同的。然而,这项研究对希望鼓励学校教师合作学习的领导者提供的指导很少。研究方法:利用来自田纳西州教师的调查和管理数据,本研究考察了全州范围内的大样本(N = 9889)中教师参与合作学习机会的程度,以及这些机会在学校之间和学校内部的分布情况。使用一系列多层次模型,我检验了受学校领导影响的学校的组织条件是否与教师报告的合作学习机会的频率和帮助有关。研究结果:我发现在不同的背景下(例如,学校水平、地理环境、学区规模),教师合作的频率有显著差异,并且发现协作规划时间一致地预测了教师合作的频率。一旦考虑到频率,教师认为他们的合作在专业氛围/领导能力评分较高,而对合作的行政监督评分较低的学校更有帮助。这些关系在不同的背景下有所不同,在专业氛围较弱的学校和规模较大的学校,监督和帮助之间的负相关关系更强。启示:领导者应该考虑如何安排他们的日程安排,以允许在校期间定期合作,但应该谨慎地规定教师如何在没有与教师共同决策的情况下度过大部分合作时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizing Schools for Collaborative Learning: School Leadership and Teachers’ Engagement in Collaboration
Purpose: Collaborative workgroups can be particularly fruitful sites for teachers to learn and improve. Prior research has illustrated how teachers' engagement in collaboration differs across school contexts. However, this research offers little guidance for leaders hoping to encourage collaborative learning among teachers in their school. Research Methods: Using survey and administrative data from teachers across Tennessee, this study examines the extent to which teachers in a large statewide sample (N = 9889) report engaging in collaborative learning opportunities and how these opportunities are distributed across and within schools. Using a series of multilevel models, I examine whether organizational conditions of schools influenced by school leaders are associated with the teacher-reported frequency and helpfulness of collaborative learning opportunities. Findings: I find significant variation in frequency across context (e.g., school level, geographic context, district size) and find that collaborative planning time consistently predicts how often teachers collaborate. Once accounting for frequency, teachers rate their collaboration as more helpful in schools with higher ratings of the professional climate/leadership and lower ratings of administrative oversight over collaboration. These relationships vary somewhat across contexts, with stronger negative relationships between oversight and helpfulness in schools with weak professional climates and large schools. Implications: Leaders should consider how to structure their schedules to allow for regular collaboration during the school day but should be cautious in mandating how teachers spend large portions of this collaborative time without shared decision-making with teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Administration Quarterly
Educational Administration Quarterly EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Educational Administration Quarterly presents prominent empirical and conceptual articles focused on timely and critical leadership and policy issues of educational organizations. As an editorial team, we embrace traditional and emergent research paradigms, methods, and issues. We particularly promote the publication of rigorous and relevant scholarly work that enhances linkages among and utility for educational policy, practice, and research arenas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信