几内亚湾油田海上挤压活动的全场优化

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM
V. Azari, O. Vazquez, S. Baraka-Lokmane, E. Mackay, Stuart Brice
{"title":"几内亚湾油田海上挤压活动的全场优化","authors":"V. Azari, O. Vazquez, S. Baraka-Lokmane, E. Mackay, Stuart Brice","doi":"10.2118/204384-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Scale inhibitor (SI) squeeze treatments are one of the most common techniques to prevent downhole scale formation. In this paper, we present the optimization of treatment design for multiple wells included in offshore campaigns. Two offshore fields with 8 and 12 production wells in west Africa were considered that are separately treated via yearly squeeze campaigns. The wells included in each campaign are treated in a single trip of the supply vessel. Based on the storage capacity of the vessel, the available volume of SI onboard should be optimally allocated to each of the wells (having different properties and water production rates), so that they are all protected from scaling for 1 year until the next campaign is carried out. A hybrid optimization methodology was applied to optimize the squeeze campaign design.\n The gradient descent (GD) algorithm was first applied to derive the squeeze “isolifetime proxies” related to each well. Each proxy includes all the possible squeeze designs that result in 365 days of squeeze lifetime in the well. Using these proxies, any combination of wells’ squeeze designs could be nominated as the campaign design, because that would result in treating all wells until the next campaign. The multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) technique was implemented to optimize the campaign design by simultaneously minimizing the total SI volume and the total injection time for the whole campaign. Minimizing the total pumping time would consequently minimize the deferred oil volume and the total cost of squeezes in the field.\n Finally, the Pareto Front was identified for each field, showing the most optimum campaign designs. The Pareto Front was shown to be a valuable tool for the operator to make a trade-off between the size of the vessel and the injection time; that is, to use a bigger vessel to transport more inhibitor to the wells or to use a smaller one but for a longer time to inject more water during the squeeze treatments in the field. A cost analysis was performed to identify the most optimum deployment plan providing the most optimum inhibitor allocation strategy, including the optimum inhibitor volume and the optimum injection time for each campaign.","PeriodicalId":22071,"journal":{"name":"Spe Production & Operations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full-Field Optimization of Offshore Squeeze Campaigns in Total Gulf of Guinea Fields\",\"authors\":\"V. Azari, O. Vazquez, S. Baraka-Lokmane, E. Mackay, Stuart Brice\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/204384-PA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Scale inhibitor (SI) squeeze treatments are one of the most common techniques to prevent downhole scale formation. In this paper, we present the optimization of treatment design for multiple wells included in offshore campaigns. Two offshore fields with 8 and 12 production wells in west Africa were considered that are separately treated via yearly squeeze campaigns. The wells included in each campaign are treated in a single trip of the supply vessel. Based on the storage capacity of the vessel, the available volume of SI onboard should be optimally allocated to each of the wells (having different properties and water production rates), so that they are all protected from scaling for 1 year until the next campaign is carried out. A hybrid optimization methodology was applied to optimize the squeeze campaign design.\\n The gradient descent (GD) algorithm was first applied to derive the squeeze “isolifetime proxies” related to each well. Each proxy includes all the possible squeeze designs that result in 365 days of squeeze lifetime in the well. Using these proxies, any combination of wells’ squeeze designs could be nominated as the campaign design, because that would result in treating all wells until the next campaign. The multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) technique was implemented to optimize the campaign design by simultaneously minimizing the total SI volume and the total injection time for the whole campaign. Minimizing the total pumping time would consequently minimize the deferred oil volume and the total cost of squeezes in the field.\\n Finally, the Pareto Front was identified for each field, showing the most optimum campaign designs. The Pareto Front was shown to be a valuable tool for the operator to make a trade-off between the size of the vessel and the injection time; that is, to use a bigger vessel to transport more inhibitor to the wells or to use a smaller one but for a longer time to inject more water during the squeeze treatments in the field. A cost analysis was performed to identify the most optimum deployment plan providing the most optimum inhibitor allocation strategy, including the optimum inhibitor volume and the optimum injection time for each campaign.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spe Production & Operations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spe Production & Operations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/204384-PA\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spe Production & Operations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204384-PA","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

阻垢剂(SI)挤压处理是防止井下结垢最常见的技术之一。在本文中,我们介绍了海上作业中多口井的处理设计优化。考虑在西非的两个海上油田,分别有8口和12口生产井,通过每年的挤压活动进行单独处理。每个活动中包括的井在供应船的一次起下钻中进行处理。根据船舶的储存能力,船上可用的SI体积应最佳分配给每口井(具有不同的性质和产水率),以便在下一次活动之前的一年内保护它们不结垢。采用混合优化方法对挤压活动设计进行了优化。梯度下降(GD)算法首先用于推导与每口井相关的挤压“等寿命代理”。每个代理都包括所有可能的挤压设计,从而产生365 井内的挤压寿命天数。使用这些代理,任何油井挤压设计的组合都可以被提名为活动设计,因为这将导致在下一次活动之前处理所有油井。实现了多目标粒子群优化(MOPSO)技术,通过同时最小化整个战役的总SI体积和总注射时间来优化战役设计。因此,最大限度地减少总泵送时间将最大限度地降低延迟的油量和现场挤压的总成本。最后,确定了每个领域的Pareto Front,显示了最优化的战役设计。Pareto Front被证明是操作员在血管大小和注射时间之间进行权衡的一个有价值的工具;也就是说,在现场的挤压处理过程中,使用更大的容器将更多的抑制剂输送到井中,或者使用更小但时间更长的容器注入更多的水。进行成本分析,以确定提供最佳抑制剂分配策略的最佳部署计划,包括每个活动的最佳抑制剂体积和最佳注入时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Full-Field Optimization of Offshore Squeeze Campaigns in Total Gulf of Guinea Fields
Scale inhibitor (SI) squeeze treatments are one of the most common techniques to prevent downhole scale formation. In this paper, we present the optimization of treatment design for multiple wells included in offshore campaigns. Two offshore fields with 8 and 12 production wells in west Africa were considered that are separately treated via yearly squeeze campaigns. The wells included in each campaign are treated in a single trip of the supply vessel. Based on the storage capacity of the vessel, the available volume of SI onboard should be optimally allocated to each of the wells (having different properties and water production rates), so that they are all protected from scaling for 1 year until the next campaign is carried out. A hybrid optimization methodology was applied to optimize the squeeze campaign design. The gradient descent (GD) algorithm was first applied to derive the squeeze “isolifetime proxies” related to each well. Each proxy includes all the possible squeeze designs that result in 365 days of squeeze lifetime in the well. Using these proxies, any combination of wells’ squeeze designs could be nominated as the campaign design, because that would result in treating all wells until the next campaign. The multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) technique was implemented to optimize the campaign design by simultaneously minimizing the total SI volume and the total injection time for the whole campaign. Minimizing the total pumping time would consequently minimize the deferred oil volume and the total cost of squeezes in the field. Finally, the Pareto Front was identified for each field, showing the most optimum campaign designs. The Pareto Front was shown to be a valuable tool for the operator to make a trade-off between the size of the vessel and the injection time; that is, to use a bigger vessel to transport more inhibitor to the wells or to use a smaller one but for a longer time to inject more water during the squeeze treatments in the field. A cost analysis was performed to identify the most optimum deployment plan providing the most optimum inhibitor allocation strategy, including the optimum inhibitor volume and the optimum injection time for each campaign.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spe Production & Operations
Spe Production & Operations 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: SPE Production & Operations includes papers on production operations, artificial lift, downhole equipment, formation damage control, multiphase flow, workovers, stimulation, facility design and operations, water treatment, project management, construction methods and equipment, and related PFC systems and emerging technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信