社会情感理论视角下中美报纸话语情感的对比研究——以《香港国家安全法》报道为例

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Z. Peng, Jianbo Hou
{"title":"社会情感理论视角下中美报纸话语情感的对比研究——以《香港国家安全法》报道为例","authors":"Z. Peng, Jianbo Hou","doi":"10.1177/17504813231158526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, there is an emotional turn in news researches, however, there are not many theories dedicated to the studies of emotions in news discourse. Therefore, by employing corpus analysis, this paper proposes Socio-emotional Theory, and contrasts the emotions in the news discourse on Hong Kong National Security Law between China’s and American newspapers. The results show that as for the themes of emotional discourse, China’s newspapers emphasize national security, social stability, anti-interference in China’s internal affairs, the positive roles of the law, the destructive nature of Hong Kong separatists, and their unreasonable resistance to the law; while American newspapers highlight their worry and fear about the law. Secondly, in terms of the distribution of emotional semantic categories, China’s newspapers talk more about confidence and happiness; however, American newspapers display more fear, sadness, worry, anger, and disappointment. As for ideologies, China’s newspapers show support for the law with less worry, while American newspapers display their opposition to the law with worry and anger, and these differences in ideologies actually reflect the conflict between China’s Democratic Centralism and western Populism. This study can provide enlightenment for the construction of a harmonious international discourse system, expand the ontological components and interpretation boundaries of discourse analysis theories, and promote the researches on emotions of news discourse.","PeriodicalId":46726,"journal":{"name":"Discourse & Communication","volume":"17 1","pages":"441 - 461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A contrastive study of discoursal emotions between China’s and American newspapers from the perspective of Socio-emotional Theory: The case of the reports on Hong Kong National Security Law\",\"authors\":\"Z. Peng, Jianbo Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17504813231158526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At present, there is an emotional turn in news researches, however, there are not many theories dedicated to the studies of emotions in news discourse. Therefore, by employing corpus analysis, this paper proposes Socio-emotional Theory, and contrasts the emotions in the news discourse on Hong Kong National Security Law between China’s and American newspapers. The results show that as for the themes of emotional discourse, China’s newspapers emphasize national security, social stability, anti-interference in China’s internal affairs, the positive roles of the law, the destructive nature of Hong Kong separatists, and their unreasonable resistance to the law; while American newspapers highlight their worry and fear about the law. Secondly, in terms of the distribution of emotional semantic categories, China’s newspapers talk more about confidence and happiness; however, American newspapers display more fear, sadness, worry, anger, and disappointment. As for ideologies, China’s newspapers show support for the law with less worry, while American newspapers display their opposition to the law with worry and anger, and these differences in ideologies actually reflect the conflict between China’s Democratic Centralism and western Populism. This study can provide enlightenment for the construction of a harmonious international discourse system, expand the ontological components and interpretation boundaries of discourse analysis theories, and promote the researches on emotions of news discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse & Communication\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"441 - 461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse & Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813231158526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813231158526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,新闻研究出现了情感转向,但专门研究新闻话语中情感的理论并不多。因此,本文运用语料库分析的方法,提出了社会情感理论,并对中美报刊在香港国家安全法新闻话语中的情感进行了对比。结果表明,在情感话语的主题上,中国报纸强调国家安全、社会稳定、干涉中国内政、法律的积极作用、香港分裂分子的破坏性以及他们对法律的不合理抵制;而美国报纸则强调了他们对法律的担忧和恐惧。其次,在情感语义类别的分布上,中国报纸更多地谈论自信和幸福;然而,美国的报纸显示出更多的恐惧、悲伤、担忧、愤怒和失望。在意识形态方面,中国的报纸对法律的支持不那么担心,而美国的报纸则对法律的反对充满担忧和愤怒,而这些意识形态的差异实际上反映了中国民主集中制与西方民粹主义之间的冲突。本研究可为构建和谐的国际话语体系提供启示,拓展话语分析理论的本体论构成和解释边界,促进新闻话语情感研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A contrastive study of discoursal emotions between China’s and American newspapers from the perspective of Socio-emotional Theory: The case of the reports on Hong Kong National Security Law
At present, there is an emotional turn in news researches, however, there are not many theories dedicated to the studies of emotions in news discourse. Therefore, by employing corpus analysis, this paper proposes Socio-emotional Theory, and contrasts the emotions in the news discourse on Hong Kong National Security Law between China’s and American newspapers. The results show that as for the themes of emotional discourse, China’s newspapers emphasize national security, social stability, anti-interference in China’s internal affairs, the positive roles of the law, the destructive nature of Hong Kong separatists, and their unreasonable resistance to the law; while American newspapers highlight their worry and fear about the law. Secondly, in terms of the distribution of emotional semantic categories, China’s newspapers talk more about confidence and happiness; however, American newspapers display more fear, sadness, worry, anger, and disappointment. As for ideologies, China’s newspapers show support for the law with less worry, while American newspapers display their opposition to the law with worry and anger, and these differences in ideologies actually reflect the conflict between China’s Democratic Centralism and western Populism. This study can provide enlightenment for the construction of a harmonious international discourse system, expand the ontological components and interpretation boundaries of discourse analysis theories, and promote the researches on emotions of news discourse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Discourse & Communication
Discourse & Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Discourse & Communication is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles that pay specific attention to the qualitative, discourse analytical approach to issues in communication research. Besides the classical social scientific methods in communication research, such as content analysis and frame analysis, a more explicit study of the structures of discourse (text, talk, images or multimedia messages) allows unprecedented empirical insights into the many phenomena of communication. Since contemporary discourse study is not limited to the account of "texts" or "conversation" alone, but has extended its field to the study of the cognitive, interactional, social, cultural.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信