作为心理过程的教与学

IF 4.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Victoria L. Cross
{"title":"作为心理过程的教与学","authors":"Victoria L. Cross","doi":"10.1159/000518406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engeness (this issue, DOI 10.1159/000) begins this article with the statement that “learning as a psychological process has been downplayed in the design of MOOCs.” I hope that Engeness is wrong about this and that this paper is not the first or the only guide for massive open online course (MOOC) designers to account for the psychological aspects of human learning. The principles of instructional design and pedagogy draw heavily on our understanding of learning as an entire suite of psychological processes. Many of the individuals who teach, whether in MOOCs, in other online environments, or in person, have extensive understanding of a range of pedagogical or instructional design principles and are working with instructional designers to encourage deep and meaningful learning by utilizing the best of our understanding of learning and memory as psychological processes. Along with most industries during the worldwide pandemic, higher education needed to rapidly move to remote delivery. Remote instruction requires a more planned and structured approach; the adjustments and improvisations that an instructor can make live in the classroom do not easily translate into remote delivery. The instructional designers on campuses became suddenly more popular and in demand. Let us take this historic moment, when the opportunities and affordances of remote instruction are on the minds of many instructors, as an opportunity to review and revisit the instructional design and pedagogy that underpin our teaching and learning. Whether this is a reminder of familiar promising practices or a foray into uncharted territory, our courses and our students will benefit from our concerted effort to ensure that the psychological processes of teaching and learning remain clearly in our minds and in our instructional design.","PeriodicalId":47837,"journal":{"name":"Human Development","volume":"65 1","pages":"234 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching and Learning as Psychological Processes\",\"authors\":\"Victoria L. Cross\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000518406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Engeness (this issue, DOI 10.1159/000) begins this article with the statement that “learning as a psychological process has been downplayed in the design of MOOCs.” I hope that Engeness is wrong about this and that this paper is not the first or the only guide for massive open online course (MOOC) designers to account for the psychological aspects of human learning. The principles of instructional design and pedagogy draw heavily on our understanding of learning as an entire suite of psychological processes. Many of the individuals who teach, whether in MOOCs, in other online environments, or in person, have extensive understanding of a range of pedagogical or instructional design principles and are working with instructional designers to encourage deep and meaningful learning by utilizing the best of our understanding of learning and memory as psychological processes. Along with most industries during the worldwide pandemic, higher education needed to rapidly move to remote delivery. Remote instruction requires a more planned and structured approach; the adjustments and improvisations that an instructor can make live in the classroom do not easily translate into remote delivery. The instructional designers on campuses became suddenly more popular and in demand. Let us take this historic moment, when the opportunities and affordances of remote instruction are on the minds of many instructors, as an opportunity to review and revisit the instructional design and pedagogy that underpin our teaching and learning. Whether this is a reminder of familiar promising practices or a foray into uncharted territory, our courses and our students will benefit from our concerted effort to ensure that the psychological processes of teaching and learning remain clearly in our minds and in our instructional design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Development\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"234 - 238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000518406\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000518406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Engeness(本期,DOI 10.1159/000)以“在MOOC的设计中,学习作为一个心理过程被淡化了”的说法开始了这篇文章。我希望Engeness在这方面是错误的,这篇论文不是大规模开放在线课程(MOOC)设计者解释人类学习心理方面的第一篇或唯一指南。教学设计和教育学的原则在很大程度上依赖于我们对学习作为一整套心理过程的理解。许多教师,无论是在慕课、其他在线环境中还是亲自授课,都对一系列教学或教学设计原则有着广泛的理解,并与教学设计师合作,通过利用我们对学习和记忆作为心理过程的最佳理解,鼓励深入而有意义的学习。与全球疫情期间的大多数行业一样,高等教育需要迅速转向远程教学。远程教学需要一种更有计划、更有结构的方法;教师在课堂上所能做出的调整和即兴创作并不容易转化为远程授课。校园里的教学设计师突然变得更加受欢迎和受欢迎。让我们抓住这一历史性时刻,当许多教师都在考虑远程教学的机会和可供性时,我们有机会回顾和重新审视支撑我们教学的教学设计和教学法。无论这是对熟悉的有希望的实践的提醒,还是对未知领域的探索,我们的课程和学生都将受益于我们的共同努力,以确保教学的心理过程清晰地留在我们的脑海和教学设计中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching and Learning as Psychological Processes
Engeness (this issue, DOI 10.1159/000) begins this article with the statement that “learning as a psychological process has been downplayed in the design of MOOCs.” I hope that Engeness is wrong about this and that this paper is not the first or the only guide for massive open online course (MOOC) designers to account for the psychological aspects of human learning. The principles of instructional design and pedagogy draw heavily on our understanding of learning as an entire suite of psychological processes. Many of the individuals who teach, whether in MOOCs, in other online environments, or in person, have extensive understanding of a range of pedagogical or instructional design principles and are working with instructional designers to encourage deep and meaningful learning by utilizing the best of our understanding of learning and memory as psychological processes. Along with most industries during the worldwide pandemic, higher education needed to rapidly move to remote delivery. Remote instruction requires a more planned and structured approach; the adjustments and improvisations that an instructor can make live in the classroom do not easily translate into remote delivery. The instructional designers on campuses became suddenly more popular and in demand. Let us take this historic moment, when the opportunities and affordances of remote instruction are on the minds of many instructors, as an opportunity to review and revisit the instructional design and pedagogy that underpin our teaching and learning. Whether this is a reminder of familiar promising practices or a foray into uncharted territory, our courses and our students will benefit from our concerted effort to ensure that the psychological processes of teaching and learning remain clearly in our minds and in our instructional design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Development
Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Distinguished by its international recognition since 1958, "Human Development" publishes in-depth conceptual articles, commentaries, and essay book reviews that advance our understanding of developmental phenomena. Contributions serve to raise theoretical issues, flesh out interesting and potentially powerful ideas, and differentiate key constructs. Contributions are welcomed from varied disciplines, including anthropology, biology, education, history, philosophy, psychology, and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信